Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.04 
    0.038114388 = product of:
  0.09528597 = sum of:
    0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038640905 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  2. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.03 
    0.033350088 = product of:
  0.083375216 = sum of:
    0.03381079 = weight(_text_:it in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03381079 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.22368698 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  3. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02 
    0.016993519 = product of:
  0.08496759 = sum of:
    0.08496759 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496759 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  4. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02 
    0.016021643 = product of:
  0.08010821 = sum of:
    0.08010821 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08010821 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  5. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01 
    0.014018938 = product of:
  0.07009469 = sum of:
    0.07009469 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07009469 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  6. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  7. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  8. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
  9. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=2996,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
  10. Format integration and its effect on the USMARC bibliographic format (1992) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 8045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=8045,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 8045, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8045)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Shows the bibliographic format as it currently exists, as well as the format integration work remaining to be done. Additionally, appendices bring together the elements to be added, extended to other forms of material, and made obsolete, as well as name changes. Also presents an overview of format integration. Addenda are being issued with the publication to keep it up to date
  11. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=8865,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
  12. Chang, R.; Raatjes, R.: Understanding MARC : another look (1990) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 3542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=3542,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 3542, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3542)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    MARC (Machine Readable Cataloguing) format has been widely used and discussed in the library profession. However, there appear to have a wide spread misunderstanding of its real structure and attributes. Discusses the need for use to understand it a little more. Presents the general misconceptions about MARC, the structure of MARC format. In this library automation age, MARC is a key element in library services, and it deserves another look.
  13. Coetzee, H.S.: Development of SAMARC : South African format for the exchange of machine readable bibliographic descriptions (1997) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=889,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The first edition of 'SAMARC: South African format for the exchange of machine readable descriptions' was published in 1982. Since then a number of important developments in various fields made it essential that the format be updated and revised. A draft second edition was made available in 1993 and the SAMARC manual was published in 1995 by the State Library. In Apr 1997 it was however decided by the South African library community to change to USMARC
  14. Markup and metadata (1998) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=1835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the range of applications of the XML meta language, which allows users to design their own markup language and share it with others. Instead of being confined to HTML, where 'one size fits all', industries, academic disciplines and professional organizations can use XML syntax to create a common set of tags which standardize the presentation of information. The linking abilities of XML are more powerful than HTML, so that it will support bidirectional and multiway links, as well as those to a span of text rather than to a single point
  15. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  17. Graham, C.; Johnston, J.: Format integration and serials cataloging (1997) 0.01 
    0.009660226 = product of:
  0.04830113 = sum of:
    0.04830113 = weight(_text_:it in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04830113 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.31955284 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Outlines some goals which format integration has achieved, and also some new problems which it brings. Cataloguers therefore have a great deal to consider in formulating policies
  18. Greenberg, J.: Subject control of ephemera : MARC format options (1996) 0.01 
    0.009563136 = product of:
  0.04781568 = sum of:
    0.04781568 = weight(_text_:it in 543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04781568 = score(doc=543,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.31634116 = fieldWeight in 543, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=543)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Provides an overview of the MARC format and the structure of the bibliographic MARC record. Discusses the MARC-AMC and MARC-VM formats as options for controlling ephemera, lists popular controlled vocabulary tools for subject control over ephemera material and examines subject analysis methodologies. Considers the specific MARC field options for the subject control of ephemera and provides 3 worked examples. Concludes that, while it can be argued that the MARC format does not provide an ideal control system for ephemera, it does offer an excellent means of controlling ephemera in the online environment and permits ephemera to be intellectually linked with related materials of all formats
  19. Witt, M.; Leresche, F.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : cataloguing practice in France (1995) 0.01 
    0.0077281813 = product of:
  0.038640905 = sum of:
    0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038640905 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the French reaction. Covers the entities considered for cataloguing; elements for identifying a document; access points; and authority records. Considers whether it is possible to reduce redundancies among the elements contained in bibliographic records caused by overlapping between the ISBD description, the access points and the coded information; and whether OPACs can be developed to present clearly to users various entities from the most general level to the most specific level
  20. Mueller, C.J.; Whittaker, M.A.: What is this thing called MARC(S)? (1990) 0.01 
    0.0077281813 = product of:
  0.038640905 = sum of:
    0.038640905 = weight(_text_:it in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038640905 = score(doc=3588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.25564227 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue devoted to serials and reference services. Familiarity with the basic elements of the MARC format and their effect on the display and retrieval of bibliographic data is an essential element of public service in those libraries with MARC-based on-line catalogues. Describes the components of a MARC record. To successfully retrieve the information sought from an on-line catalogue, the catalogue user must know whether it is in an indexed field and, if so, must be familiar with the search strategies required by the system.

Authors

Types

  • a 27
  • ? 1
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes