Search (139 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Boßmeyer, C.: UNIMARC und MAB : Strukturunterschiede und Kompatibilitätsfragen (1995) 0.05
    0.05176259 = product of:
      0.25881293 = sum of:
        0.03244254 = weight(_text_:und in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03244254 = score(doc=2368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
        0.03788411 = product of:
          0.07576822 = sum of:
            0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07576822 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07576822 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
        0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07576822 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
        0.03244254 = weight(_text_:und in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03244254 = score(doc=2368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 42(1995) H.5, S.465-480
  2. Gradmann, S.: MAB2, UNIMARC, USMARC : strategische Überlegungen zur Formatdiskussion (1995) 0.04
    0.04081985 = product of:
      0.20409924 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=2369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
        0.033148594 = product of:
          0.06629719 = sum of:
            0.06629719 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06629719 = score(doc=2369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06629719 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06629719 = score(doc=2369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
        0.06629719 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06629719 = score(doc=2369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=2369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
        0.0055775414 = weight(_text_:s in 2369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055775414 = score(doc=2369,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 2369, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2369)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 42(1995) H.5, S.481-489
  3. Katic, T.: Retrospective cataloguing of Croatian older books in UNIMARC (1997) 0.01
    0.005135417 = product of:
      0.05135417 = sum of:
        0.041212514 = weight(_text_:buch in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041212514 = score(doc=1644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10028592 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
        0.007887987 = weight(_text_:in in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007887987 = score(doc=1644,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the background to proposals made by the National and University Library of Zagreb, Croatia, based on experiences in automating the cataloguing of its rare and older books, which led to the incorporation of new fields in the 1996 update of the UNIMARC manual: bilbiographic format and the UNIMARC guideline no.3: older monographs (antiquarian). Explains these additions as they apply to ideal or perfect copy and copy in hand, bound items in artificial collections and access points which gather bibliographic items by various characteristics
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 26(1997) no.4, S.82-84
    Theme
    Altes Buch
  4. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.00
    0.002760662 = product of:
      0.02760662 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
        0.00478075 = weight(_text_:s in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00478075 = score(doc=6077,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
        0.017534448 = product of:
          0.035068896 = sum of:
            0.035068896 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035068896 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library review 48(1999) nos.3/4, S.204-205 (K.V. Trickey)
    Pages
    281 S
  5. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.00
    0.002231292 = product of:
      0.022312919 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
        0.016531637 = product of:
          0.033063274 = sum of:
            0.033063274 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033063274 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  6. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.00
    0.00217834 = product of:
      0.021783398 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=5100,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
        0.014465182 = product of:
          0.028930364 = sum of:
            0.028930364 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028930364 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Pages
    S.79-80
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  7. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.00
    0.001971958 = product of:
      0.019719578 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=57,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.010648641 = product of:
          0.03194592 = sum of:
            0.03194592 = weight(_text_:l in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03194592 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0037795147 = weight(_text_:s in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037795147 = score(doc=57,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16116315 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
    Footnote
    Rez. in: RQ 36(1996) no.2, S.313-314 (L. Chase); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 27(1998) no.1, S.27 (C. Oliver)
    Pages
    235 S
    Type
    s
  8. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.00
    0.0019102376 = product of:
      0.019102376 = sum of:
        0.006901989 = weight(_text_:in in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006901989 = score(doc=6523,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  9. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.00
    0.0018990219 = product of:
      0.018990219 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=8779,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.0034155329 = weight(_text_:s in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034155329 = score(doc=8779,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14564252 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
    Pages
    VIII,84 S
    Type
    s
  10. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.00
    0.0018932101 = product of:
      0.0189321 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses how archivists use the MARC AMC format to exchange information about archival materials. The paper explains the modifications that MARC AMC introduced to the MARC bibliographic formats; gives examples of a record in generic USMARC AMC, RLIN AMC, and OCLC AMC; and considers the possible impact of format integration. The paper concludes with some thoughts about the changes that MARC AMC is causing in the archival profession.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) nos.3/4, S.117-143
  11. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.00
    0.0017470915 = product of:
      0.017470915 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The British Library have conformed their decision to go ahead with the harmonization programme between the US and UKMARC formats, and although the final date for the changeover is still not yet, they expect the whole process to be over in 2 years, with one further year after that when they will support UKMARC. Describes the progress made so far, and problems that remain to be solved
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  12. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.00
    0.0017470915 = product of:
      0.017470915 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  13. USMARC format for authority data : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.00
    0.0017282102 = product of:
      0.017282102 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=2713,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Includes changes to all examples throughout the publication, as approved by MARBI in January 1993. Makes obsolete the second indicator position (non-filing characters) in all of the heading fields except the 130, which is uniform titles. Also new to this edition: definition of 18X heading fields for general, geographic and chronological subdivision headings, plus related 48X and 58X fields... 7XX fields for heading-linking entries... and the control field 003, named the 'control number identifier.' Also eliminates the national-level requirement codes at the field level
    Pages
    650 S
    Type
    l
  14. Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990) 0.00
    0.0015820917 = product of:
      0.015820917 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=6081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    A practical manual describing standard procedures in cataloguing using AACR2 1988 revision and LoC cataloguing data
    Pages
    96 S
  15. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.00
    0.0015287049 = product of:
      0.015287049 = sum of:
        0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030866629 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  16. USMARC format for bibliographic data : including guidelines for content designation (1994) 0.00
    0.0011396578 = product of:
      0.017094865 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=8041,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=8041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Here is the standard for representing and exchanging bibliographic data in machine-readable form in the United States. This comprehensive publication defines the structure of the MARC bibliographic record in full detail. Also defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in USMARC bibliographic records. Includes specifications for a National Level Bibliographic record (both full and minimal). The remaining future format integration changes are specified
    Type
    l
  17. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.00
    0.0010144832 = product of:
      0.015217247 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
        0.011689632 = product of:
          0.023379264 = sum of:
            0.023379264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023379264 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  18. USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991) 0.00
    9.972005E-4 = product of:
      0.014958006 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=4372,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
        0.008784681 = product of:
          0.026354041 = sum of:
            0.026354041 = weight(_text_:l in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026354041 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
    Type
    l
  19. Ede, S.: LandMARC decision (1997) 0.00
    8.1759685E-4 = product of:
      0.012263952 = sum of:
        0.007483202 = weight(_text_:in in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007483202 = score(doc=93,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
        0.00478075 = weight(_text_:s in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00478075 = score(doc=93,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Provides an update of developments in the process of harmonization of the MARC formats used in the USA, Canada and the USA. Sets out the aims of the MARC Harmonization Coordinating Committee
    Source
    Select newsletter. 1997, no.20, S.3
  20. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1991) 0.00
    7.8339124E-4 = product of:
      0.011750868 = sum of:
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
        0.0055775414 = weight(_text_:s in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055775414 = score(doc=899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 53(1992) S.86-88 (E.A. Franco)
    Pages
    331 S

Authors

Types

  • a 113
  • m 15
  • s 6
  • l 3
  • r 3
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications