Search (79 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01 
    0.014018938 = product of:
  0.07009469 = sum of:
    0.07009469 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07009469 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  2. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  3. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  4. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  5. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  6. Jacobs, J.W.; Summers, E.; Ankersen, E.: Cyril: expanding the horizons of MARC21 (2004) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.8-17
  7. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
  8. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.01 
    0.011329013 = product of:
  0.05664506 = sum of:
    0.05664506 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05664506 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
  9. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=2996,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
  10. Format integration and its effect on the USMARC bibliographic format (1992) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 8045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=8045,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 8045, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8045)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Shows the bibliographic format as it currently exists, as well as the format integration work remaining to be done. Additionally, appendices bring together the elements to be added, extended to other forms of material, and made obsolete, as well as name changes. Also presents an overview of format integration. Addenda are being issued with the publication to keep it up to date
  11. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=8865,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
  12. Chang, R.; Raatjes, R.: Understanding MARC : another look (1990) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 3542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=3542,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 3542, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3542)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    MARC (Machine Readable Cataloguing) format has been widely used and discussed in the library profession. However, there appear to have a wide spread misunderstanding of its real structure and attributes. Discusses the need for use to understand it a little more. Presents the general misconceptions about MARC, the structure of MARC format. In this library automation age, MARC is a key element in library services, and it deserves another look.
  13. Coetzee, H.S.: Development of SAMARC : South African format for the exchange of machine readable bibliographic descriptions (1997) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=889,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The first edition of 'SAMARC: South African format for the exchange of machine readable descriptions' was published in 1982. Since then a number of important developments in various fields made it essential that the format be updated and revised. A draft second edition was made available in 1993 and the SAMARC manual was published in 1995 by the State Library. In Apr 1997 it was however decided by the South African library community to change to USMARC
  14. Markup and metadata (1998) 0.01 
    0.010929298 = product of:
  0.05464649 = sum of:
    0.05464649 = weight(_text_:it in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05464649 = score(doc=1835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.36153275 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the range of applications of the XML meta language, which allows users to design their own markup language and share it with others. Instead of being confined to HTML, where 'one size fits all', industries, academic disciplines and professional organizations can use XML syntax to create a common set of tags which standardize the presentation of information. The linking abilities of XML are more powerful than HTML, so that it will support bidirectional and multiway links, as well as those to a span of text rather than to a single point
  15. Stephens, O.: Introduction to OpenRefine (2014) 0.01 
    0.010039202 = product of:
  0.050196007 = sum of:
    0.050196007 = weight(_text_:it in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050196007 = score(doc=2884,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15115225 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.33208904 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.892262 = idf(docFreq=6664, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    OpenRefine is described as a tool for working with 'messy' data - but what does this mean? It is probably easiest to describe the kinds of data OpenRefine is good at working with and the sorts of problems it can help you solve. OpenRefine is most useful where you have data in a simple tabular format but with internal inconsistencies either in data formats, or where data appears, or in terminology used. It can help you: Get an overview of a data set Resolve inconsistencies in a data set Help you split data up into more granular parts Match local data up to other data sets Enhance a data set with data from other sources Some common scenarios might be: 1. Where you want to know how many times a particular value appears in a column in your data. 2. Where you want to know how values are distributed across your whole data set. 3. Where you have a list of dates which are formatted in different ways, and want to change all the dates in the list to a single common date format.
  16. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  17. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  18. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  19. Smith, J.K.; Cunningham, R.L.; Sarapata, S.P.: MARC to ENC MARC : bringing the collection forward (2004) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=2844,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2844, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2844)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.28-39
  20. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.01 
    0.009912886 = product of:
  0.04956443 = sum of:
    0.04956443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04956443 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18300882 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052260913 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 67
  • el 5
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes