-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.06
0.06445197 = product of:
0.12890394 = sum of:
0.12890394 = sum of:
0.049044564 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049044564 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.079859376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079859376 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.05
0.046162233 = product of:
0.092324466 = sum of:
0.092324466 = sum of:
0.042913996 = weight(_text_:web in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042913996 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.049410466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049410466 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009)
0.04
0.039567623 = product of:
0.07913525 = sum of:
0.07913525 = sum of:
0.03678342 = weight(_text_:web in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03678342 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.042351827 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042351827 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:38
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = product of:
0.11293821 = sum of:
0.11293821 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11293821 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.024705233 = product of:
0.049410466 = sum of:
0.049410466 = product of:
0.09882093 = sum of:
0.09882093 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09882093 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.024705233 = product of:
0.049410466 = sum of:
0.049410466 = product of:
0.09882093 = sum of:
0.09882093 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09882093 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.02
0.021175914 = product of:
0.042351827 = sum of:
0.042351827 = product of:
0.084703654 = sum of:
0.084703654 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084703654 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.019964844 = product of:
0.039929688 = sum of:
0.039929688 = product of:
0.079859376 = sum of:
0.079859376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079859376 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Miller, D.R.: XML: Libraries' strategic opportunity (2001)
0.02
0.018770961 = product of:
0.037541922 = sum of:
0.037541922 = product of:
0.075083844 = sum of:
0.075083844 = weight(_text_:web in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075083844 = score(doc=1467,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- XML (eXtensible Markup Language) is fast gaining favor as the universal format for data and document exchange -- in effect becoming the lingua franca of the Information Age. Currently, "library information" is at a particular disadvantage on the rapidly evolving World Wide Web. Why? Despite libraries'explorations of web catalogs, scanning projects, digital data repositories, and creation of web pages galore, there remains a digital divide. The core of libraries' data troves are stored in proprietary formats of integrated library systems (ILS) and in the complex and arcane MARC formats -- both restricted chiefly to the province of technical services and systems librarians. Even they are hard-pressed to extract and integrate this wealth of data with resources from outside this rarefied environment. Segregation of library information underlies many difficulties: producing standard bibliographic citations from MARC data, automatically creating new materials lists (including new web resources) on a particular topic, exchanging data with our vendors, and even migrating from one ILS to another. Why do we continue to hobble our potential by embracing these self-imposed limitations? Most ILSs began in libraries, which soon recognized the pitfalls of do-it-yourself solutions. Thus, we wisely anticipated the necessity for standards. However, with the advent of the web, we soon found "our" collections and a flood of new resources appearing in digital format on opposite sides of the divide. If we do not act quickly to integrate library resources with mainstream web resources, we are in grave danger of becoming marginalized
-
Holt, B.: Presentation of UNIMARC on the Web : new fields, including the one for electronic resources (1999)
0.02
0.01839171 = product of:
0.03678342 = sum of:
0.03678342 = product of:
0.07356684 = sum of:
0.07356684 = weight(_text_:web in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07356684 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Qin, J.: Representation and organization of information in the Web space : from MARC to XML (2000)
0.02
0.01839171 = product of:
0.03678342 = sum of:
0.03678342 = product of:
0.07356684 = sum of:
0.07356684 = weight(_text_:web in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07356684 = score(doc=3918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.02
0.017469238 = product of:
0.034938477 = sum of:
0.034938477 = product of:
0.069876954 = sum of:
0.069876954 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069876954 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Michard, A.; Pham Dac, D.: Description of collections and encyclopedias on the Web using XML (1998)
0.02
0.017339872 = product of:
0.034679744 = sum of:
0.034679744 = product of:
0.06935949 = sum of:
0.06935949 = weight(_text_:web in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06935949 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web
-
Scholz, M.: Wie können Daten im Web mit JSON nachgenutzt werden? (2023)
0.02
0.017339872 = product of:
0.034679744 = sum of:
0.034679744 = product of:
0.06935949 = sum of:
0.06935949 = weight(_text_:web in 5345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06935949 = score(doc=5345,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5345, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Martin Scholz ist Informatiker an der Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg. Als Leiter der dortigen Gruppe Digitale Entwicklung und Datenmanagement beschäftigt er sich viel mit Webtechniken und Datentransformation. Er setzt sich mit der aktuellen ABI-Techik-Frage auseinander: Wie können Daten im Web mit JSON nachgenutzt werden?
-
Manguinhas, H.; Freire, N.; Machado, J.; Borbinha, J.: Supporting multilingual bibliographic resource discovery with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2012)
0.02
0.017135466 = product of:
0.03427093 = sum of:
0.03427093 = product of:
0.06854186 = sum of:
0.06854186 = weight(_text_:web in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06854186 = score(doc=133,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper describes an experiment exploring the hypothesis that innovative application of the Functional Require-ments for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) principles can complement traditional bibliographic resource discovery systems in order to improve the user experience. A specialized service was implemented that, when given a plain list of results from a regular online catalogue, was able to process, enrich and present that list in a more relevant way for the user. This service pre-processes the records of a traditional online catalogue in order to build a semantic structure following the FRBR model. The service also explores web search features that have been revolutionizing the way users conceptualize resource discovery, such as relevance ranking and metasearching. This work was developed in the context of the TELPlus project. We processed nearly one hundred thousand bibliographic and authority records, in multiple languages, and originating from twelve European na-tional libraries. This paper describes the architecture of the service and the main challenges faced, especially concerning the extraction and linking of the relevant FRBR entities from the bibliographic metadata produced by the libraries. The service was evaluated by end users, who filled out a questionnaire after using a traditional online catalogue and the new service, both with the same bibliographic collection. The analysis of the results supports the hypothesis that FRBR can be implemented for re-source discovery in a non-intrusive way, reusing the data of any existing traditional bibliographic system.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: Vgl.: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/supporting-multilingual-bibliographic-resource-discovery-functional-requirements-bibliograph http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj145_2.pdf.
- Source
- Semantic Web journal. 3(2012) no.1, S.3-21
-
Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001)
0.02
0.015172388 = product of:
0.030344777 = sum of:
0.030344777 = product of:
0.060689554 = sum of:
0.060689554 = weight(_text_:web in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060689554 = score(doc=5896,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
-
Johnson, B.C.: XML and MARC : which is "right"? (2001)
0.02
0.015172388 = product of:
0.030344777 = sum of:
0.030344777 = product of:
0.060689554 = sum of:
0.060689554 = weight(_text_:web in 5423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060689554 = score(doc=5423,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17002425 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5423, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5423)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article explores recent discussions about appropriate mark-up conventions for library information intended for use on the World Wide Web. In particular, the question of whether the MARC 21 format will continue to be useful and whether the time is right for a full-fledged conversion effort to XML is explored. The author concludes that the MARC format will be relevant well into the future, and its use will not hamper access to bibliographic information via the web. Early XML exploratory efforts carried out at the Stanford University's Lane Medical Library are reported on. Although these efforts are a promising start, much more consultation and investigation is needed to arrive at broadly acceptable standards for XML library information encoding and retrieval.
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.014117276 = product of:
0.028234553 = sum of:
0.028234553 = product of:
0.056469105 = sum of:
0.056469105 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056469105 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18244034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052098576 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
