Search (241 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Schöning-Walter, C.: Persistant Identifier für Netzpublikationen (2007) 0.06
    0.055152345 = product of:
      0.09192057 = sum of:
        0.008020778 = weight(_text_:information in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008020778 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
        0.049517054 = weight(_text_:und in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049517054 = score(doc=2409,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.47420087 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
        0.03438274 = product of:
          0.06876548 = sum of:
            0.06876548 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06876548 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24217154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.28395358 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenwärtig werden große Mengen ursprünglich analog vorliegender Publikationen digitalisiert, um den Benutzerzugriff über Datennetze zu vereinfachen. Gleichzeitig wachsen Menge und Heterogenität der originär in digitaler Form erscheinenden Veröffentlichungen weiter an. Mehr und mehr Zeitschriften, Hochschulschriften, Lehr- und Lernmaterialien, aber auch Bücher, werden online publiziert. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten stehen teilweise überhaupt nicht mehr in gedruckter Form, sondern nur noch elektronisch zur Verfügung. Viele Autoren und wissenschaftliche Institutionen übernehmen mittlerweile selbst die Veröffentlichung und Verbreitung ihrer Publikationen. Und auch die Erscheinungsformen von Publikationen verändern sich und lösen sich teilweise sogar auf. Für alle am Publikationsprozess beteiligten Institutionen ergeben sich durch diese Veränderungen von Publikationsstrukturen und -formen neue Herausforderungen. So gewinnt für die Bibliotheken die Sammlung, Erschließung und Bereitstellung von Netzpublikationen sowie deren Langzeitarchivierung eine zunehmend stärkere Bedeutung. Als Netzpublikationen gelten alle Darstellungen in Schrift, Bild und Ton, die in öffentlichen Netzen zugänglich gemacht werden. Elektronische Zeitschriften, E-Books, Hochschulprüfungsarbeiten, Forschungsberichte, Kongressschriften und Lehrmaterialien gehören genauso dazu wie Digitalisate alter Drucke, Musikdateien oder Webseiten. Für die Information und Kommunikation in Wissenschaft und Forschung haben Netzpublikationen längst eine herausragende Bedeutung. Damit digitale Objekte zitierfähig sind, müssen sie jedoch auf Dauer - inhaltlich unverändert! - als Referenzen zur Verfügung stehen und trotz aller voraussichtlichen technischen und organisatorischen Veränderungen auch in der Zukunft noch zuverlässig auffindbar sein.
  2. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.04
    0.036791705 = product of:
      0.09197926 = sum of:
        0.040912796 = weight(_text_:und in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040912796 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
        0.051066462 = product of:
          0.102132924 = sum of:
            0.102132924 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102132924 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  3. Grötschel, M.; Lügger, J.: Aufbau elektronischer Informations- und Kommunikationsstrukturen (1995) 0.02
    0.02330275 = product of:
      0.058256876 = sum of:
        0.02245818 = weight(_text_:information in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02245818 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
        0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035798695 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  4. Luksch, P.: Multimediale Informationsversorgung durch elektronisches Publizieren in Wissenschaft und Technik (1995) 0.02
    0.02330275 = product of:
      0.058256876 = sum of:
        0.02245818 = weight(_text_:information in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02245818 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
        0.035798695 = weight(_text_:und in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035798695 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  5. Schumacher, M.: Content is King : Content Management in Fachverlagen per Online-Software (2007) 0.02
    0.021498417 = product of:
      0.05374604 = sum of:
        0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012833246 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.040912796 = weight(_text_:und in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040912796 = score(doc=1749,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Fachverlage benötigen in einem wandlungs- und wettbewerbsintensiven Marktumfeld effiziente Content Management-Strategien. Tausende von jährlich weltweit neu erscheinenden Fachbüchern und derzeit rund 24.000 nach wissenschaftlichen Kriterien publizierte Zeitschriften mit rund 2,5 Millionen Fachbeiträgen unterstreichen den Bedarf an verlagsweiten Verwaltungslösungen. Online genutzte Manuskriptverwaltungslösungen wie Editorial Manager von Aries sind Teil dieser Content-Management-Strategien. Zunehmend gibt es in diesem Verlagssegment auch Bestrebungen, die Internet-basierte Softwareunterstützung über den nachgelagerten Herstellungs- und Verwertungsprozess auszudehnen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.4, S.222-224
  6. Doering, P.F.: ¬The hidden dangers of electronic publishing (1995) 0.02
    0.019183239 = product of:
      0.0479581 = sum of:
        0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016041556 = score(doc=4551,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
        0.03191654 = product of:
          0.06383308 = sum of:
            0.06383308 = weight(_text_:22 in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06383308 = score(doc=4551,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 21:39:19
    Source
    Information services and use. 15(1995) no.4, S.385-396
  7. Medelsohn, L.D.: Chemistry journals : the transition from paper to electronic with lessons for other disciplines (2003) 0.02
    0.016268773 = product of:
      0.04067193 = sum of:
        0.021522008 = weight(_text_:information in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021522008 = score(doc=1871,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
        0.019149924 = product of:
          0.038299847 = sum of:
            0.038299847 = weight(_text_:22 in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038299847 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Chemical information sciences-ranging from subjectspecific bibliometrics to sophisticated theoretical systems for modeling structures and reactions-have historically led in developing new technologies. Hundreds of papers are published or presented at conferences annually in this discipline. One of the more significant conferences at which important research has historically been presented is the Tri-Society Symposium an Chemical Information, an event jointly sponsored by the American Chemical Society, the American Society for Information Science and Technology, and the Special Libraries Association and held every four years. Eight years ago, the theme of this conference was the chemist's workstation; papers were presented an developments enabling chemists to access and process a variety of different types of chemical information from their desktop or laboratory bench. Several of these papers were subsequently published as a Perspectives issue.
    Date
    19.10.2003 17:17:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.12, S.1136-1137
  8. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.02
    0.015346591 = product of:
      0.038366478 = sum of:
        0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012833246 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
        0.025533231 = product of:
          0.051066462 = sum of:
            0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051066462 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.6, S.507-516
  9. Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999) 0.02
    0.015346591 = product of:
      0.038366478 = sum of:
        0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012833246 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
        0.025533231 = product of:
          0.051066462 = sum of:
            0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051066462 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:43:47
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.6, S.537-543
  10. Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998) 0.02
    0.015346591 = product of:
      0.038366478 = sum of:
        0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012833246 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
        0.025533231 = product of:
          0.051066462 = sum of:
            0.051066462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051066462 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:00:52
    Source
    Information management and technology. 31(1998) no.2, S.77-81
  11. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.02
    0.015288765 = product of:
      0.03822191 = sum of:
        0.015880331 = weight(_text_:information in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015880331 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.022341577 = product of:
          0.044683155 = sum of:
            0.044683155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044683155 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
  12. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.01
    0.013104655 = product of:
      0.032761637 = sum of:
        0.0136117125 = weight(_text_:information in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0136117125 = score(doc=2757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
        0.019149924 = product of:
          0.038299847 = sum of:
            0.038299847 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038299847 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses on the process of scientific and scholarly communication. Data on open access publications on the Internet not only provides a supplement to the traditional citation indexes but also enables analysis of the microprocesses and daily practices that constitute scientific communication. This article focuses on a stage in the life cycle of scientific and scholarly information that precedes the publication of formal research articles in the scientific and scholarly literature. Binomial logistic regression models are used to analyse precise mechanisms at work in the transformation of a working paper (WP) into a journal article (JA) in the field of economics. The study unveils a fine-grained process of adapting WPs to their new context as JAs by deleting and adding literature references, which perhaps can be best captured by the term sculpting.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.728-739
  13. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.01
    0.011509943 = product of:
      0.028774858 = sum of:
        0.009624934 = weight(_text_:information in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009624934 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
        0.019149924 = product of:
          0.038299847 = sum of:
            0.038299847 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038299847 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  14. Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021) 0.01
    0.010749209 = product of:
      0.02687302 = sum of:
        0.006416623 = weight(_text_:information in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006416623 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.020456398 = weight(_text_:und in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020456398 = score(doc=250,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Es handelt sich um eine bibliometrische Untersuchung der Entwicklung der Open-Access-Verfügbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenartikel in Deutschland, die im Zeitraum 2010-18 erschienen und im Web of Science indexiert sind. Ein besonderes Augenmerk der Analyse lag auf der Frage, ob und inwiefern sich die Open-Access-Profile der Universitäten und außeruniversitären Wissenschaftseinrichtungen in Deutschland voneinander unterscheiden.
    Content
    This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
    Footnote
    Den Aufsatz begleitet ein interaktives Datensupplement, mit dem sich die OA-Anteile auf Ebene der Einrichtung vergleichen lassen. https://subugoe.github.io/oauni/articles/supplement.html. Die Arbeit entstand in Zusammenarbeit der BMBF-Projekte OAUNI und OASE der Förderlinie "Quantitative Wissenschaftsforschung". https://www.wihoforschung.de/de/quantitative-wissenschaftsforschung-1573.php.
  15. Elektronische Publikationen im Literatur- und Informationsangebot wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (1995) 0.01
    0.010629456 = product of:
      0.05314728 = sum of:
        0.05314728 = weight(_text_:und in 2367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05314728 = score(doc=2367,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10442211 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 2367, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2367)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Enthält auch Aussagen zur Formal- und Inhaltserschließung (S.457-458)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 42(1995) H.5, S.445-463
  16. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.01
    0.010213292 = product of:
      0.051066462 = sum of:
        0.051066462 = product of:
          0.102132924 = sum of:
            0.102132924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102132924 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  17. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01
    0.0095916195 = product of:
      0.02397905 = sum of:
        0.008020778 = weight(_text_:information in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008020778 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
        0.01595827 = product of:
          0.03191654 = sum of:
            0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03191654 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1614-1628
  18. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01
    0.0095916195 = product of:
      0.02397905 = sum of:
        0.008020778 = weight(_text_:information in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008020778 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
        0.01595827 = product of:
          0.03191654 = sum of:
            0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03191654 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635
  19. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01
    0.0095916195 = product of:
      0.02397905 = sum of:
        0.008020778 = weight(_text_:information in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008020778 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
        0.01595827 = product of:
          0.03191654 = sum of:
            0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03191654 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.412-431
  20. Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017) 0.01
    0.0095916195 = product of:
      0.02397905 = sum of:
        0.008020778 = weight(_text_:information in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008020778 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047114085 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
        0.01595827 = product of:
          0.03191654 = sum of:
            0.03191654 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03191654 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1649855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047114085 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.674-687

Years