-
Bertha, E.: Nutzung von elektronischen Publikationen (1995)
0.03
0.03208051 = product of:
0.06416102 = sum of:
0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060400415 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
0.003760605 = product of:
0.011281814 = sum of:
0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011281814 = score(doc=622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Type
- a
-
Schumacher, M.: Content is King : Content Management in Fachverlagen per Online-Software (2007)
0.02
0.022294924 = product of:
0.044589847 = sum of:
0.042709544 = weight(_text_:von in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042709544 = score(doc=1749,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.3334936 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Wissenschaftliche Fachverlage benötigen in einem wandlungs- und wettbewerbsintensiven Marktumfeld effiziente Content Management-Strategien. Tausende von jährlich weltweit neu erscheinenden Fachbüchern und derzeit rund 24.000 nach wissenschaftlichen Kriterien publizierte Zeitschriften mit rund 2,5 Millionen Fachbeiträgen unterstreichen den Bedarf an verlagsweiten Verwaltungslösungen. Online genutzte Manuskriptverwaltungslösungen wie Editorial Manager von Aries sind Teil dieser Content-Management-Strategien. Zunehmend gibt es in diesem Verlagssegment auch Bestrebungen, die Internet-basierte Softwareunterstützung über den nachgelagerten Herstellungs- und Verwertungsprozess auszudehnen.
- Type
- a
-
Riehm, U.; Böhle, K.; Wingert, B.; Gabel-Becker, I.; Loeben, M.: Autoren, Verlage, Nutzer : Elektronisches Publizieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1989)
0.02
0.020050319 = product of:
0.040100638 = sum of:
0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03775026 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
0.002350378 = product of:
0.007051134 = sum of:
0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007051134 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Die Ergebnisse des Projekts Elektronisches Publizieren (PEP) werden übersichtsartig dargestellt. Das Projekt umfaßte 1985-1988 eine Begleit- und Wirkungsuntersuchung zum Elektronischen Publizieren von Volltexten
- Type
- a
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.02
0.019223286 = product of:
0.07689314 = sum of:
0.07689314 = product of:
0.11533971 = sum of:
0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011281814 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.10405789 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10405789 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
- Type
- a
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.02
0.019223286 = product of:
0.07689314 = sum of:
0.07689314 = product of:
0.11533971 = sum of:
0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011281814 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.10405789 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10405789 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
- Type
- a
-
Schöning-Walter, C.: Persistant Identifier für Netzpublikationen (2007)
0.02
0.016933937 = product of:
0.033867873 = sum of:
0.032692686 = weight(_text_:von in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032692686 = score(doc=2409,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25527787 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
0.001175189 = product of:
0.003525567 = sum of:
0.003525567 = weight(_text_:a in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003525567 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Gegenwärtig werden große Mengen ursprünglich analog vorliegender Publikationen digitalisiert, um den Benutzerzugriff über Datennetze zu vereinfachen. Gleichzeitig wachsen Menge und Heterogenität der originär in digitaler Form erscheinenden Veröffentlichungen weiter an. Mehr und mehr Zeitschriften, Hochschulschriften, Lehr- und Lernmaterialien, aber auch Bücher, werden online publiziert. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten stehen teilweise überhaupt nicht mehr in gedruckter Form, sondern nur noch elektronisch zur Verfügung. Viele Autoren und wissenschaftliche Institutionen übernehmen mittlerweile selbst die Veröffentlichung und Verbreitung ihrer Publikationen. Und auch die Erscheinungsformen von Publikationen verändern sich und lösen sich teilweise sogar auf. Für alle am Publikationsprozess beteiligten Institutionen ergeben sich durch diese Veränderungen von Publikationsstrukturen und -formen neue Herausforderungen. So gewinnt für die Bibliotheken die Sammlung, Erschließung und Bereitstellung von Netzpublikationen sowie deren Langzeitarchivierung eine zunehmend stärkere Bedeutung. Als Netzpublikationen gelten alle Darstellungen in Schrift, Bild und Ton, die in öffentlichen Netzen zugänglich gemacht werden. Elektronische Zeitschriften, E-Books, Hochschulprüfungsarbeiten, Forschungsberichte, Kongressschriften und Lehrmaterialien gehören genauso dazu wie Digitalisate alter Drucke, Musikdateien oder Webseiten. Für die Information und Kommunikation in Wissenschaft und Forschung haben Netzpublikationen längst eine herausragende Bedeutung. Damit digitale Objekte zitierfähig sind, müssen sie jedoch auf Dauer - inhaltlich unverändert! - als Referenzen zur Verfügung stehen und trotz aller voraussichtlichen technischen und organisatorischen Veränderungen auch in der Zukunft noch zuverlässig auffindbar sein.
- Type
- a
-
Zahedi, Z.; Costas, R.; Wouters, P.: Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications (2017)
0.01
0.014029406 = product of:
0.056117624 = sum of:
0.056117624 = product of:
0.084176436 = sum of:
0.00863584 = weight(_text_:a in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00863584 = score(doc=3837,freq=12.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.075540595 = weight(_text_:z in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075540595 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This study presents a large-scale analysis of the distribution and presence of Mendeley readership scores over time and across disciplines. We study whether Mendeley readership scores (RS) can identify highly cited publications more effectively than journal citation scores (JCS). Web of Science (WoS) publications with digital object identifiers (DOIs) published during the period 2004-2013 and across five major scientific fields were analyzed. The main result of this study shows that RS are more effective (in terms of precision/recall values) than JCS to identify highly cited publications across all fields of science and publication years. The findings also show that 86.5% of all the publications are covered by Mendeley and have at least one reader. Also, the share of publications with Mendeley RS is increasing from 84% in 2004 to 89% in 2009, and decreasing from 88% in 2010 to 82% in 2013. However, it is noted that publications from 2010 onwards exhibit on average a higher density of readership versus citation scores. This indicates that compared to citation scores, RS are more prevalent for recent publications and hence they could work as an early indicator of research impact. These findings highlight the potential and value of Mendeley as a tool for scientometric purposes and particularly as a relevant tool to identify highly cited publications.
- Type
- a
-
Ming, W.; Zhao, Z.: Rethinking the open access citation advantage : evidence from the "reverse-flipping" journals (2022)
0.01
0.014029406 = product of:
0.056117624 = sum of:
0.056117624 = product of:
0.084176436 = sum of:
0.00863584 = weight(_text_:a in 750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00863584 = score(doc=750,freq=12.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 750, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=750)
0.075540595 = weight(_text_:z in 750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075540595 = score(doc=750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=750)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Although the open access citation advantage (OACA) has been discussed extensively, scholars lack a clear understanding of the mechanisms through which switching from subscription-based model to open access (OA) model affects the citation impact of a scholarly journal. Many journals have switched from subscription to OA, yet they later also flipped their preswitching articles (i.e., those under subscription model) to OA, thus leaving no subscription article to be compared with their postswitching OA counterparts. To detect the switching effect, our study instead focused on 60 journals that "reverse flipped" from OA to subscription. We use a difference-in-difference (DiD) analytical framework to analyze two propositions related to OACA, based on the bibliographic and citation data of pre- and postswitching publications in these journals. Our findings indicate that reverse flipping is unlikely to affect the journals' impact through changing the visibility of their articles. Instead, it could lead to a systematical shift in the submissions to the journals and thus considerably affect their impact. Our findings have important theoretical and practical implications for subsequent studies, funding agencies, and scholarly journals considering a reverse flip.
- Type
- a
-
Fang, Z.; Dudek, J.; Costas, R.: ¬The stability of Twitter metrics : a study on unavailable Twitter mentions of scientific publications (2020)
0.01
0.013607843 = product of:
0.05443137 = sum of:
0.05443137 = product of:
0.08164705 = sum of:
0.006106462 = weight(_text_:a in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006106462 = score(doc=35,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.075540595 = weight(_text_:z in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075540595 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2562021 = queryWeight, product of:
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29484767 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This study investigated the stability of Twitter counts of scientific publications over time. For this, we conducted an analysis of the availability statuses of over 2.6 million Twitter mentions received by the 1,154 most tweeted scientific publications recorded by Altmetric.com up to October 2017. The results show that of the Twitter mentions for these highly tweeted publications, about 14.3% had become unavailable by April 2019. Deletion of tweets by users is the main reason for unavailability, followed by suspension and protection of Twitter user accounts. This study proposes two measures for describing the Twitter dissemination structures of publications: Degree of Originality (i.e., the proportion of original tweets received by an article) and Degree of Concentration (i.e., the degree to which retweets concentrate on a single original tweet). Twitter metrics of publications with relatively low Degree of Originality and relatively high Degree of Concentration were observed to be at greater risk of becoming unstable due to the potential disappearance of their Twitter mentions. In light of these results, we emphasize the importance of paying attention to the potential risk of unstable Twitter counts, and the significance of identifying the different Twitter dissemination structures when studying the Twitter metrics of scientific publications.
- Type
- a
-
Doering, P.F.: ¬The hidden dangers of electronic publishing (1995)
0.01
0.012501333 = product of:
0.05000533 = sum of:
0.05000533 = product of:
0.075008 = sum of:
0.0099718105 = weight(_text_:a in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0099718105 = score(doc=4551,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
0.065036185 = weight(_text_:22 in 4551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065036185 = score(doc=4551,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4551, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4551)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Considers dangers posed by the growth of electronic publishing. These fall into 3 groups: dangers to reputation, dangers to intellectual property, and dangers to organizational integrity. Discusses these danger areas and suggests a number of defences
- Date
- 22. 7.1996 21:39:19
- Type
- a
-
Brodersen, M.; Germann, N.; Schwens, U.: Informationsveranstaltung zum Thema Netzpublikationen : Gemeinsamer Workshop der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und des Arbeitskreises Elektronisches Publizieren (AKEP) (2007)
0.01
0.012322258 = product of:
0.024644516 = sum of:
0.022650154 = weight(_text_:von in 3977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022650154 = score(doc=3977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 3977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3977)
0.001994362 = product of:
0.005983086 = sum of:
0.005983086 = weight(_text_:a in 3977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005983086 = score(doc=3977,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3977, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3977)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Am 27. November 2007 veranstalteten die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) und der AKEP des Verlegerausschusses des Börsenvereins des Deutschen Buchhandels eine Informationsveranstaltung und einen sich daran anschließenden Expertenworkshop zum Thema Netzpublikationen. Zunächst stand die Vermittlung von Fakten, u. a. zu Ablieferungsverfahren, rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen und zur Pflichtablieferungsverordnung im Vordergrund. Im weiteren Verlauf des Tages wurde mit Fachleuten der Verlage, insbesondere aus dem Bereich Elektronisches Publizieren, über die Praxis innnerhalb der Verlage und die Auswirkungen der digitalen Pflichtexemplare diskutiert. Zu Veranstaltungsbeginn wurde bereits durch Matthias Ulmer (Ulmer Verlag, Verlegerausschuss im Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels) deutlich, dass sich die Verlage Klarheit hinsichtlich des Ablieferungsverfahrens der elektronischen Pflichtexemplare wünschen, um diese in ihre Pläne zu E-Books im Jahr 2008 einbeziehen zu können. Das Ziel des Workshops bestand im Wesentlichen darin, einen Konsens bezüglich der gemeinsam getragenen Absprachen zu erzielen, die später einem erweiterten Kreis zugänglich gemacht werden sollen. Dies ist ein anspruchsvolles Ziel!
- Type
- a
-
Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995)
0.01
0.012014553 = product of:
0.04805821 = sum of:
0.04805821 = product of:
0.07208732 = sum of:
0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007051134 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.065036185 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065036185 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
- Type
- a
-
Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998)
0.01
0.010299881 = product of:
0.041199524 = sum of:
0.041199524 = product of:
0.061799284 = sum of:
0.009770338 = weight(_text_:a in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009770338 = score(doc=3620,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999)
0.01
0.010299881 = product of:
0.041199524 = sum of:
0.041199524 = product of:
0.061799284 = sum of:
0.009770338 = weight(_text_:a in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009770338 = score(doc=3674,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Recent years have seen a proliferation of electronic journals across academic disciplines. Electronic journals offer many advantages to multiple constituencies, however, their acceptance by faculty and university promotion and tenure committees is unclear. This research examines perceptions of faculty and promotion and tenure committee members regarding the perceived prestige and legitimacy of electronic journals as an outlet for scholarly communication
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 14:43:47
- Type
- a
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.01
0.010001066 = product of:
0.040004265 = sum of:
0.040004265 = product of:
0.060006395 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=7245,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
- Type
- a
-
Weibel, S.: ¬An architecture for scholarly publishing on the World Wide Web (1995)
0.01
0.010001066 = product of:
0.040004265 = sum of:
0.040004265 = product of:
0.060006395 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=4555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- OCLC distributes several scholarly journals under its Electronic Journals Online programme, acting, in effect, as an 'electronic printer' for scholarly publishers. It is prototyping a WWW accessible version of these journals. Describes the problems encountered, detail some of the short term solutions, and highlight changes to existing standards that will enhance the use of the WWW for scholarly electronic publishing
- Date
- 23. 7.1996 10:22:20
- Type
- a
-
Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996)
0.01
0.010001066 = product of:
0.040004265 = sum of:
0.040004265 = product of:
0.060006395 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=7481,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In print publications, content elements are representable in visual form, but in digital presentation function may be shown through hypertext. Good design must be a tool to illuminate content, not an arbitrary add on. Sets out elements of good digital design. Consideration of the purpose of the publication, the use of the publication, the audience, and the market will help to identify appropriate design choices
- Source
- Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
- Type
- a
-
Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998)
0.01
0.010001066 = product of:
0.040004265 = sum of:
0.040004265 = product of:
0.060006395 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=3035,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 16:56:06
- Type
- a
-
Alexander, M.: Digitising books, manuscripts and scholarly materials : preparation, handling, scanning, recognition, compression, storage formats (1998)
0.01
0.009611643 = product of:
0.03844657 = sum of:
0.03844657 = product of:
0.057669856 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
0.052028947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052028947 = score(doc=3686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3686)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:00:52
- Type
- a
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.01
0.009232819 = product of:
0.036931276 = sum of:
0.036931276 = product of:
0.055396914 = sum of:
0.009871588 = weight(_text_:a in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009871588 = score(doc=582,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.045525327 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045525327 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
- Type
- a
