Search (275 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Luksch, P.: Multimediale Informationsversorgung durch elektronisches Publizieren in Wissenschaft und Technik (1995) 0.01
    0.010021609 = product of:
      0.090194486 = sum of:
        0.083924696 = weight(_text_:technik in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083924696 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109023005 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.976667 = idf(docFreq=828, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.76978886 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.976667 = idf(docFreq=828, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
        0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 2570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062697898 = score(doc=2570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2570)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
  2. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.01
    0.007863529 = product of:
      0.07077176 = sum of:
        0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007165474 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
        0.063606285 = product of:
          0.09540942 = sum of:
            0.047920246 = weight(_text_:29 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047920246 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
            0.047489174 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047489174 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2000 12:41:29
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  3. Singleton, A.K.J.: Electronic journals for everyone? (1993) 0.01
    0.0076319403 = product of:
      0.06868746 = sum of:
        0.06510472 = product of:
          0.13020945 = sum of:
            0.13020945 = weight(_text_:elektrotechnik in 7371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13020945 = score(doc=7371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17964433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.724818 = fieldWeight in 7371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.200379 = idf(docFreq=32, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7371)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 7371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003582737 = score(doc=7371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 7371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7371)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    From incomplete networks, questions of quality control and copyright, to unified pricing policies, the route to fully electronic scientific communication has many pitfalls. However, change is inevitable, and a quick tour of the models currently being investigated is provided. These include researchers' own electronic publishing ventures. OCLC/AAAS electronic journal 'Current clinical trials', 'IEE's Electronics letters', American Chemical Society (ACS) projects with and without graphics, Elsevier's TULIP (The University Licensing Programme) project to supply 42 materials science journals in electronic form, and the Institute of Physics Publishing future developments including the SuperJournal demonstration project on the SuperJanet network
    Field
    Elektrotechnik
  4. Odlyzko, A.M.: Tragic loss or good riddance? : The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals (1995) 0.00
    0.0038624357 = product of:
      0.03476192 = sum of:
        0.007756854 = weight(_text_:in in 64) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007756854 = score(doc=64,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 64, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=64)
        0.027005067 = weight(_text_:der in 64) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027005067 = score(doc=64,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.55185866 = fieldWeight in 64, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=64)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Beitrag zur Zukunft der Zeitschriften auf dem Gebiet der Mathematik und der elektronischen Fachinformation in der Mathematik
    Footnote
    Auch in: Notices of the AMS und in langer Form (tragic.loss.long.ps) über ftp vom Rechner ftp.att.com aus dem Verzeichnis /pub/att/math.odlyzko
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 1995, H.1, S.19-24
  5. Brodersen, M.; Germann, N.; Schwens, U.: Informationsveranstaltung zum Thema Netzpublikationen : Gemeinsamer Workshop der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und des Arbeitskreises Elektronisches Publizieren (AKEP) (2007) 0.00
    0.0024287498 = product of:
      0.021858748 = sum of:
        0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 3977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026870528 = score(doc=3977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 3977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3977)
        0.019171696 = weight(_text_:der in 3977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019171696 = score(doc=3977,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.3917808 = fieldWeight in 3977, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3977)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Am 27. November 2007 veranstalteten die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) und der AKEP des Verlegerausschusses des Börsenvereins des Deutschen Buchhandels eine Informationsveranstaltung und einen sich daran anschließenden Expertenworkshop zum Thema Netzpublikationen. Zunächst stand die Vermittlung von Fakten, u. a. zu Ablieferungsverfahren, rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen und zur Pflichtablieferungsverordnung im Vordergrund. Im weiteren Verlauf des Tages wurde mit Fachleuten der Verlage, insbesondere aus dem Bereich Elektronisches Publizieren, über die Praxis innnerhalb der Verlage und die Auswirkungen der digitalen Pflichtexemplare diskutiert. Zu Veranstaltungsbeginn wurde bereits durch Matthias Ulmer (Ulmer Verlag, Verlegerausschuss im Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels) deutlich, dass sich die Verlage Klarheit hinsichtlich des Ablieferungsverfahrens der elektronischen Pflichtexemplare wünschen, um diese in ihre Pläne zu E-Books im Jahr 2008 einbeziehen zu können. Das Ziel des Workshops bestand im Wesentlichen darin, einen Konsens bezüglich der gemeinsam getragenen Absprachen zu erzielen, die später einem erweiterten Kreis zugänglich gemacht werden sollen. Dies ist ein anspruchsvolles Ziel!
  6. Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021) 0.00
    0.0021783223 = product of:
      0.0196049 = sum of:
        0.0059412974 = weight(_text_:in in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059412974 = score(doc=250,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.19937998 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.013663604 = weight(_text_:der in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013663604 = score(doc=250,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Es handelt sich um eine bibliometrische Untersuchung der Entwicklung der Open-Access-Verfügbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenartikel in Deutschland, die im Zeitraum 2010-18 erschienen und im Web of Science indexiert sind. Ein besonderes Augenmerk der Analyse lag auf der Frage, ob und inwiefern sich die Open-Access-Profile der Universitäten und außeruniversitären Wissenschaftseinrichtungen in Deutschland voneinander unterscheiden.
    Content
    This study investigates the development of open access (OA) to journal articles from authors affiliated with German universities and non-university research institutions in the period 2010-2018. Beyond determining the overall share of openly available articles, a systematic classification of distinct categories of OA publishing allowed us to identify different patterns of adoption of OA. Taking into account the particularities of the German research landscape, variations in terms of productivity, OA uptake and approaches to OA are examined at the meso-level and possible explanations are discussed. The development of the OA uptake is analysed for the different research sectors in Germany (universities, non-university research institutes of the Helmholtz Association, Fraunhofer Society, Max Planck Society, Leibniz Association, and government research agencies). Combining several data sources (incl. Web of Science, Unpaywall, an authority file of standardised German affiliation information, the ISSN-Gold-OA 3.0 list, and OpenDOAR), the study confirms the growth of the OA share mirroring the international trend reported in related studies. We found that 45% of all considered articles during the observed period were openly available at the time of analysis. Our findings show that subject-specific repositories are the most prevalent type of OA. However, the percentages for publication in fully OA journals and OA via institutional repositories show similarly steep increases. Enabling data-driven decision-making regarding the implementation of OA in Germany at the institutional level, the results of this study furthermore can serve as a baseline to assess the impact recent transformative agreements with major publishers will likely have on scholarly communication.
    Footnote
    Den Aufsatz begleitet ein interaktives Datensupplement, mit dem sich die OA-Anteile auf Ebene der Einrichtung vergleichen lassen. https://subugoe.github.io/oauni/articles/supplement.html. Die Arbeit entstand in Zusammenarbeit der BMBF-Projekte OAUNI und OASE der Förderlinie "Quantitative Wissenschaftsforschung". https://www.wihoforschung.de/de/quantitative-wissenschaftsforschung-1573.php.
  7. Brown, D.: Electronic publishing in science (1996) 0.00
    0.0019711377 = product of:
      0.017740238 = sum of:
        0.007756854 = weight(_text_:in in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007756854 = score(doc=4990,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
        0.009983385 = product of:
          0.029950155 = sum of:
            0.029950155 = weight(_text_:29 in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029950155 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a joint Unesco/ICSU conference held in Paris, 19-23 Feb 1996, entitled 'Electronic publishing in science'. Focuses on technical and legal issues, giving the viewpoints of library and information professionals on the one hand, scientists on the other
    Date
    6. 9.1996 19:29:56
  8. Riehm, U.; Böhle, K.; Wingert, B.; Gabel-Becker, I.; Loeben, M.: Autoren, Verlage, Nutzer : Elektronisches Publizieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1989) 0.00
    0.0018394949 = product of:
      0.016555455 = sum of:
        0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044784215 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
        0.0120770335 = weight(_text_:der in 5914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0120770335 = score(doc=5914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 5914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5914)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
  9. Olivieri, R.: Academic publishing in transition : the academic publishers response (1995) 0.00
    0.0018030024 = product of:
      0.016227022 = sum of:
        0.0063334443 = weight(_text_:in in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063334443 = score(doc=4988,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
        0.0098935785 = product of:
          0.029680735 = sum of:
            0.029680735 = weight(_text_:22 in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029680735 = score(doc=4988,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the changing forces of demand, supply and technical change in the field of academic publishing. Covers electronic publishing; the UnCover document delivery service from B.H. Blackwell; the work of Blackwell Science and Blackwell Publishers and electronic pilot studies
    Source
    IATUL proceedings (new series). 4(1995), S.15-22
  10. Shen, W.; Stempfhuber, M.: Embedding discussion in online publications (2013) 0.00
    0.0017911666 = product of:
      0.016120499 = sum of:
        0.0064588715 = weight(_text_:in in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064588715 = score(doc=940,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.2167489 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.009661627 = weight(_text_:der in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009661627 = score(doc=940,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Grey Literature and Open Access publications have the potential to become the basis of new types of scientific publications, in which scientific discourse and collaboration can play a central role in the dissemination of knowledge, due to their machine-readable format and electronic availability. With advances in cyber science and e-(Social) Science, an increasing number of scientific publications are required to be shared with different group members or even within communities in virtual reading environments. However, the most often used format for publishing articles on the web is still the Adobe PDF format, which limits the extent to which readers of an article can interact with online content and within their browser environment. This not only separates the formal communication - the article itself - from the informal communication about a publication - the discussion about the article - but also fails to link the different threads of communications which might appear in parallel at different locations in the scientific community as a whole. Analysis of around 30 web sites where different ways for presenting formal and informal communications were conducted shows in the identification of several prototypes of media combinations which were then evaluated against human factor aspects (distance between related information, arrangement of related information etc). Based on this evaluation we concluded that at the time of analysis, no model exist for directly integrating formal and informal communication to a single media, allowing readers of publications to directly discuss within the publication, e.g. to extend the publication with their input directly at the paragraph they wanted to comment. Therefore, a new publishing medium is necessary to fulfil the gap between the formal and informal communication, facilitating and engaging academic readers' active participating in the online scientific discourse. We have developed an online discussion service, which allows interactive features for annotation directly available at the point in the publication to which the comment refers to. Besides the exchange of ideas and the stimulation of discourse across portals and communities we approach at the same time to create a new basis for research in scientific discourse, networking and collaboration. This is supported by linking from the individual article to other publications or information items in digital libraries.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.12
    Source
    Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation: Proceedings der 12. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Bonn, 19. bis 21. Oktober 2009. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly
  11. Leskien, H.: ¬The impact of electronic publishing on library services (1996) 0.00
    0.0017630123 = product of:
      0.01586711 = sum of:
        0.0062054833 = weight(_text_:in in 4841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062054833 = score(doc=4841,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 4841, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4841)
        0.009661627 = weight(_text_:der in 4841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009661627 = score(doc=4841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 4841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4841)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    In June 95, the library committee of the DFG published an official statement on the impact of electronic publishing on the services of scholarly libraries. The committee aimed to provide guidelines for librarians and the German Research Society. Describes the characteristics of electronic publiahing, covering long-term availability, the balance between purchase and access; indexing in a state of flux and the role of libraries as publishing houses
    Series
    Veröffentlichungen der Universitätsbibliothek Essen; 20
    Source
    Electronic documents and information: from preservation to access; Festschrift in honor of Patricia Battin. 18th International Symposium, 23.-26.10.1995. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
  12. Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996) 0.00
    0.001675593 = product of:
      0.0150803365 = sum of:
        0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007165474 = score(doc=7481,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
        0.007914863 = product of:
          0.023744587 = sum of:
            0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023744587 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    In print publications, content elements are representable in visual form, but in digital presentation function may be shown through hypertext. Good design must be a tool to illuminate content, not an arbitrary add on. Sets out elements of good digital design. Consideration of the purpose of the publication, the use of the publication, the audience, and the market will help to identify appropriate design choices
    Source
    Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
  13. Susol, J.: Access to information in electronic age : situation in Slovakia (2000) 0.00
    0.0016495949 = product of:
      0.014846354 = sum of:
        0.007600134 = weight(_text_:in in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007600134 = score(doc=5495,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
        0.00724622 = weight(_text_:der in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00724622 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic publishing brings about some substantial shifts in technological as well as socio-political patterns that were in place during the era of paper publications. The tension between producer and consumer side of the information cycle is the most significant feature of this change. Authors and publishers try to maximise their revenues from the marketing of information and backed by the possibilities of technology they force major changes in legislation governing the area of (public) information access. In this environment, the society's interest in a wide-spread accessibility of electronic data must be balanced by substantial financial investments - a solution that only the rich economies of the world can feel comfortable with
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  14. Schöning-Walter, C.: Persistant Identifier für Netzpublikationen (2007) 0.00
    0.0015582973 = product of:
      0.014024676 = sum of:
        0.0054849237 = weight(_text_:in in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054849237 = score(doc=2409,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
        0.008539752 = weight(_text_:der in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008539752 = score(doc=2409,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17451303 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenwärtig werden große Mengen ursprünglich analog vorliegender Publikationen digitalisiert, um den Benutzerzugriff über Datennetze zu vereinfachen. Gleichzeitig wachsen Menge und Heterogenität der originär in digitaler Form erscheinenden Veröffentlichungen weiter an. Mehr und mehr Zeitschriften, Hochschulschriften, Lehr- und Lernmaterialien, aber auch Bücher, werden online publiziert. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten stehen teilweise überhaupt nicht mehr in gedruckter Form, sondern nur noch elektronisch zur Verfügung. Viele Autoren und wissenschaftliche Institutionen übernehmen mittlerweile selbst die Veröffentlichung und Verbreitung ihrer Publikationen. Und auch die Erscheinungsformen von Publikationen verändern sich und lösen sich teilweise sogar auf. Für alle am Publikationsprozess beteiligten Institutionen ergeben sich durch diese Veränderungen von Publikationsstrukturen und -formen neue Herausforderungen. So gewinnt für die Bibliotheken die Sammlung, Erschließung und Bereitstellung von Netzpublikationen sowie deren Langzeitarchivierung eine zunehmend stärkere Bedeutung. Als Netzpublikationen gelten alle Darstellungen in Schrift, Bild und Ton, die in öffentlichen Netzen zugänglich gemacht werden. Elektronische Zeitschriften, E-Books, Hochschulprüfungsarbeiten, Forschungsberichte, Kongressschriften und Lehrmaterialien gehören genauso dazu wie Digitalisate alter Drucke, Musikdateien oder Webseiten. Für die Information und Kommunikation in Wissenschaft und Forschung haben Netzpublikationen längst eine herausragende Bedeutung. Damit digitale Objekte zitierfähig sind, müssen sie jedoch auf Dauer - inhaltlich unverändert! - als Referenzen zur Verfügung stehen und trotz aller voraussichtlichen technischen und organisatorischen Veränderungen auch in der Zukunft noch zuverlässig auffindbar sein.
  15. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Corporate online/CD-ROM publishing : the desing and tactical issues (1996) 0.00
    0.0014731288 = product of:
      0.013258159 = sum of:
        0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062697898 = score(doc=4553,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
        0.006988369 = product of:
          0.020965107 = sum of:
            0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020965107 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Although existing document imaging software effectively serves small business needs whenit comes to publishing documents from multiple sources in various formats on CD-ROM and the WWW, the same cannot be said when it comes to large scale corporate publishing. Sets out the requirements of corporate in house document publishing, which typically include: avoiding hand crafting documents for different media, having the flexibility not to be hostage to changing word processors, vendor alliances, operating systems, or output media; reducing exception handling as volumes of published documents increase; and incorporating support for upcoming changes in HTML, if WWW publishing is planned. Focuses on the importance of SGML and DTD in this process
    Date
    23. 7.1996 9:29:36
  16. Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993) 0.00
    0.0014661439 = product of:
      0.013195295 = sum of:
        0.0062697898 = weight(_text_:in in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062697898 = score(doc=582,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.0069255047 = product of:
          0.020776514 = sum of:
            0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020776514 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
    Source
    Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
  17. Dixon, R.: SGML and HTML (1996) 0.00
    0.0014503849 = product of:
      0.013053464 = sum of:
        0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050667557 = score(doc=7483,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
        0.007986708 = product of:
          0.023960123 = sum of:
            0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023960123 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Organization take differing views of how documents should be described, resulting in different stages for electronic document publishing. The SGML anf HTML electronic publishing standards are complementary and can be aimed at separate applications. Identifies suitable applications. With the use of these standards electronic document publishing and document management are merging. Highlights issues associated with this merger and trends in how these approaches can be applied
    Source
    Information management and technology. 29(1996) no.6, S.251-254
  18. Prinsley, M.: Internationally harmonised copyright of electronic publishing : conspicuous by its absence (1997) 0.00
    0.0014503849 = product of:
      0.013053464 = sum of:
        0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050667557 = score(doc=1708,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
        0.007986708 = product of:
          0.023960123 = sum of:
            0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023960123 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the international harmonisation of copyright law. Outlines the geo/political background. Gives a history of attempts by the European Union to control digital copyright and treaties agreed by the World Intellectual Property Organization in 1996 to deal with material in digital formats. Outlines copyright infringement, types of databases and their varying copyright protection
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  19. Mizzaro, S.: Quality control in scholarly publishing : a new proposal (2003) 0.00
    0.0013968822 = product of:
      0.01257194 = sum of:
        0.0065819086 = weight(_text_:in in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0065819086 = score(doc=1810,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
        0.005990031 = product of:
          0.017970093 = sum of:
            0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017970093 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet has fostered a faster, more interactive and effective model of scholarly publishing. However, as the quantity of information available is constantly increasing, its quality is threatened, since the traditional quality control mechanism of peer review is often not used (e.g., in online repositories of preprints, and by people publishing whatever they want an their Web pages). This paper describes a new kind of electronic scholarly journal, in which the standard submission-reviewpublication process is replaced by a more sophisticated approach, based an judgments expressed by the readers: in this way, each reader is, potentially, a peer reviewer. New ingredients, not found in similar approaches, are that each reader's judgment is weighted an the basis of the reader's skills as a reviewer, and that readers are encouraged to express correct judgments by a feedback mechanism that estimates their own quality. The new electronic scholarly journal is described in both intuitive and formal ways. Its effectiveness is tested by several laboratory experiments that simulate what might happen if the system were deployed and used.
    Date
    28. 9.2003 11:29:47
  20. Vaughan, K.T.L.: impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use : Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age (2003) 0.00
    0.0013331628 = product of:
      0.011998464 = sum of:
        0.006008433 = weight(_text_:in in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006008433 = score(doc=1873,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021906832 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
        0.005990031 = product of:
          0.017970093 = sum of:
            0.017970093 = weight(_text_:29 in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017970093 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021906832 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Little data are available that can help librarians solve issues surrounding print versus online journals management, including ascertaining when print journals are no longer needed. This study examines the short-term effects of online availability an the use of print chemistry journals. The Duke University Chemistry Library gained access to Elsevier titles via ScienceDirect in February 2000. By comparing reshelving data for the print journals from 1999, 2000, and 2001, this study identif!es the shortterm changes in journals use that can be attributed to the introduction of ScienceDirect. In the first two years after ScienceDirect was introduced, use of print journals nearly halved. The diminished use of the print collection has important implications for collection management in sci-tech libraries.
    Date
    19.10.2003 17:29:16

Years

Types