-
Medelsohn, L.D.: Chemistry journals : the transition from paper to electronic with lessons for other disciplines (2003)
0.02
0.021857034 = product of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03741107 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19.10.2003 17:17:22
- Language
- e
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009)
0.02
0.021857034 = product of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03741107 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:59:25
- Language
- e
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.02
0.021857034 = product of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.04371407 = sum of:
0.006302999 = weight(_text_:e in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006302999 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.03741107 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03741107 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
- Language
- e
-
Snowhill, L.: E-books and their future in academic libraries (2001)
0.00
0.004863883 = product of:
0.009727766 = sum of:
0.009727766 = product of:
0.019455532 = sum of:
0.019455532 = weight(_text_:e in 1218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019455532 = score(doc=1218,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.29411736 = fieldWeight in 1218, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The University of California's California Digital Library (CDL) formed an Ebook Task Force in August 2000 to evaluate academic libraries' experiences with electronic books (e-books), investigate the e-book market, and develop operating guidelines, principles and potential strategies for further exploration of the use of e-books at the University of California (UC). This article, based on the findings and recommendations of the Task Force Report, briefly summarizes task force findings, and outlines issues and recommendations for making e-books viable over the long term in the academic environment, based on the long-term goals of building strong research collections and providing high level services and collections to its users.
- Language
- e
- Object
- E-books
-
Kling, R.; Spector, L.B.; Fortuna, J.: ¬The Real Stakes of Virtual Publishing : The Transformation of E-Biomed Into PubMed Central (2004)
0.00
0.004548798 = product of:
0.009097596 = sum of:
0.009097596 = product of:
0.018195191 = sum of:
0.018195191 = weight(_text_:e in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018195191 = score(doc=2096,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2750643 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In May 1999, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Harold Varmus proposed an electronic repository for biomedical research literature server called "E-biomed." E-biomed reflected the visions of scholarly electronic publishing advocates: It would be fully searchable, be free to readers, and contain full-text versions of both preprint and postpublication biomedical research articles. However, within 4 months, the E-biomed proposal was radically transformed: The preprint section was eliminated, delays were instituted between article publication and posting to the archive, and the narre was changed to "PubMed Central." This case study examines the remarkable transformation of the E-biomed proposal to PubMed Central by analyzing comments about the proposal that were posted to an online E-biomed forum created by the NIH, and discussions that took place in other face-to-face forums where E-biomed deliberations took place. We find that the transformation of the E-biomed proposal into PubMed Central was the result of highly visible and highly influential position statements made by scientific societies against the proposal. The literature about scholarly electronic publishing usually emphasizes a binary conflict between (trade) publishers and scholars/scientists. We conclude that: (1) scientific societies and the individual scientists they represent do not always have identical interests in regard to scientific e-publishing; (2) stakeholder politics and personal interests reign supreme in e-publishing debates, even in a supposedly status-free online forum; and (3) multiple communication forums must be considered in examinations of e-publishing deliberations.
- Language
- e
-
Pinfield, S.: How do physicists use an e-print archive? : implications for institutional e-print services (2001)
0.00
0.0041524656 = product of:
0.008304931 = sum of:
0.008304931 = product of:
0.016609862 = sum of:
0.016609862 = weight(_text_:e in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016609862 = score(doc=1226,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.25109822 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been suggested that institutional e-print services will become an important way of achieving the wide availability of e-prints across a broad range of subject disciplines. However, as yet there are few exemplars of this sort of service. This paper describes how physicists make use of an established centralized subject-based e-prints service, arXiv (formerly known as the Los Alamos XXX service), and discusses the possible implications of this use for institutional multidisciplinary e-print archives. A number of key points are identified, including technical issues (such as file formats and user interface design), management issues (such as submission procedures and administrative staff support), economic issues (such as installation and support costs), quality issues (such as peer review and quality control criteria), policy issues (such as digital preservation and collection development standards), academic issues (such as scholarly communication cultures and publishing trends), and legal issues (such as copyright and intellectual property rights). These are discussed with reference to the project to set up a pilot institutional e-print service at the University of Nottingham, UK. This project is being used as a pragmatic way of investigating the issues surrounding institutional e-print services, particularly in seeing how flexible the e-prints model actually is and how easily it can adapt itself to disciplines other than physics.
- Language
- e
-
Sukovic, S.: References to e-texts in academic publications (2009)
0.00
0.0041524656 = product of:
0.008304931 = sum of:
0.008304931 = product of:
0.016609862 = sum of:
0.016609862 = weight(_text_:e in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016609862 = score(doc=3615,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.25109822 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore roles of electronic texts (e-texts) in research enquiry in literary and historical studies, and to deepen the understanding of the nature of scholars' engagement with e-texts as primary materials. The study includes an investigation of references to e-texts and discussions about researchers' citation practices in interviews. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative methodology was used to explore scholars' interactions with e-texts in 30 research projects. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used to examine citations and any other acknowledgments of e-texts in participants' prepublications and published works. In-depth semi-structured interviews provided data for findings about researchers' citation practices. Findings - Formal acknowledgments of e-texts do not represent the depth and breadth of researchers' interactions with e-texts. Assessments of the relevance and trustworthiness of e-texts, as well as considerations of disciplinary cultures, had some impact on researchers' citation practices. Research limitations/implications - The study was based on in-depth data-gathering from a small group of participants. It does not have any statistical significance and the findings cannot be generalized, but comparisons with other scholars in literary and historical studies are possible. The study indicated a need for further investigation of changing academic practices in general and citation practices in particular. Practical implications - The findings have implications for the development of standards and institutional support for research in the humanities. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into the phenomenon of a very small number of citations of electronic sources in publications in the humanities, and considers issues related to citations from the perspective of changing academic cultures.
- Language
- e
-
Ewing, J.: Predicting the future of scholarly publishing (2002)
0.00
0.0036767495 = product of:
0.007353499 = sum of:
0.007353499 = product of:
0.014706998 = sum of:
0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014706998 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Huntington, P.: What do faculty and students really think about e-books? (2007)
0.00
0.0032164857 = product of:
0.0064329715 = sum of:
0.0064329715 = product of:
0.012865943 = sum of:
0.012865943 = weight(_text_:e in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012865943 = score(doc=824,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19449982 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this article is to report on a large-scale survey that was carried out to assess academic users' awareness, perceptions and existing levels of use of e-books. The survey also seeks to find out about the purposes to which electronic books were put, and to obtain an understanding of the most effective library marketing and communication channels. Design/methodology/approach - An e-mail invitation to participate in the survey was distributed to all UCL staff and students (approximately 27,000) in November 2006, and 1,818 completions were received, an effective response rate of at least 6.7 per cent. Statistical analyses were carried out on the data using Software Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Findings - The survey findings point to various ways in which user uptake and acceptance of e-books may be encouraged. Book discovery behaviour, a key issue for publishers and librarians in both print and electronic environments, emerges as a critical focus for service delivery and enhancement. Originality/value - The survey is part of an action research project, CIBER's SuperBook, that will further investigate the issues raised in this initial benchmarking survey using deep log analysis and qualitative methods. The paper partly fills the gap in the literature on e-books which has mainly focused on usage and not the users.
- Language
- e
-
Wusteman, J.: XML and e-journals : the state of play (2003)
0.00
0.0031841588 = product of:
0.0063683176 = sum of:
0.0063683176 = product of:
0.012736635 = sum of:
0.012736635 = weight(_text_:e in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012736635 = score(doc=4781,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19254501 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Within the library world, there is a growing interest in the use of XML in journals, not least because of its implications for e-journal archiving. But what is actually happening in the commercial journals market? How far have XML and its related standards permeated the production of real commercial journals and how do publishers and other providers of journals see this area developing? This paper looks at the activities and future plans of a selection of publishers and aggregators in the STM journals market, although many of the comments relate to the entire journals arena.
- Language
- e
-
Shafer, K.E.: Manipulating Tagged text (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Sotudeh, H.; Horri, A.: ¬The citation performance of open access journals : a disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models (2007)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 4479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=4479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Weibel, S.L.: Scholarly Publishing on the World Wide Web (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Shafer, K.E.: Translating Mathematical Markup for Electronic Journals (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1030)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Watson, B.C.: Converting ACM Authors' Articles to SGML (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1031,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Hickey, T.B.: Guidon Web Applying Java to Scholarly Electronic Journals (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Hickey, T.B.; Terrall, T.L.: STORD - Structured Text on Relational Databases (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Miller, E.J.: ¬An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework (2001)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Díaz, P.: Usability of hypermedia educational e-books (2003)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=1198,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- To arrive at relevant and reliable conclusions concerning the usability of a hypermedia educational e-book, developers have to apply a well-defined evaluation procedure as well as a set of clear, concrete and measurable quality criteria. Evaluating an educational tool involves not only testing the user interface but also the didactic method, the instructional materials and the interaction mechanisms to prove whether or not they help users reach their goals for learning. This article presents a number of evaluation criteria for hypermedia educational e-books and describes how they are embedded into an evaluation procedure. This work is chiefly aimed at helping education developers evaluate their systems, as well as to provide them with guidance for addressing educational requirements during the design process. In recent years, more and more educational e-books are being created, whether by academics trying to keep pace with the advanced requirements of the virtual university or by publishers seeking to meet the increasing demand for educational resources that can be accessed anywhere and anytime, and that include multimedia information, hypertext links and powerful search and annotating mechanisms. To develop a useful educational e-book many things have to be considered, such as the reading patterns of users, accessibility for different types of users and computer platforms, copyright and legal issues, development of new business models and so on. Addressing usability is very important since e-books are interactive systems and, consequently, have to be designed with the needs of their users in mind. Evaluating usability involves analyzing whether systems are effective, efficient and secure for use; easy to learn and remember; and have a good utility. Any interactive system, as e-books are, has to be assessed to determine if it is really usable as well as useful. Such an evaluation is not only concerned with assessing the user interface but is also aimed at analyzing whether the system can be used in an efficient way to meet the needs of its users - who in the case of educational e-books are learners and teachers. Evaluation provides the opportunity to gather valuable information about design decisions. However, to be successful the evaluation has to be carefully planned and prepared so developers collect appropriate and reliable data from which to draw relevant conclusions.
- Language
- e
-
Watson, B.C.: Arbitrary SGML Viewers and Their Role in Online Text Delivery Systems (2001)
0.00
0.0026262498 = product of:
0.0052524996 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = product of:
0.010504999 = sum of:
0.010504999 = weight(_text_:e in 1037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010504999 = score(doc=1037,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1037, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1037)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
