Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Brodersen, M.; Germann, N.; Schwens, U.: Informationsveranstaltung zum Thema Netzpublikationen : Gemeinsamer Workshop der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek und des Arbeitskreises Elektronisches Publizieren (AKEP) (2007) 0.01 
    0.01316634 = product of:
  0.03949902 = sum of:
    0.0063814623 = weight(_text_:e in 3977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063814623 = score(doc=3977,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3977, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3977)
    0.033117555 = weight(_text_:u in 3977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033117555 = score(doc=3977,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.107882105 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.30697915 = fieldWeight in 3977, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3977)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Am 27. November 2007 veranstalteten die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) und der AKEP des Verlegerausschusses des Börsenvereins des Deutschen Buchhandels eine Informationsveranstaltung und einen sich daran anschließenden Expertenworkshop zum Thema Netzpublikationen. Zunächst stand die Vermittlung von Fakten, u. a. zu Ablieferungsverfahren, rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen und zur Pflichtablieferungsverordnung im Vordergrund. Im weiteren Verlauf des Tages wurde mit Fachleuten der Verlage, insbesondere aus dem Bereich Elektronisches Publizieren, über die Praxis innnerhalb der Verlage und die Auswirkungen der digitalen Pflichtexemplare diskutiert. Zu Veranstaltungsbeginn wurde bereits durch Matthias Ulmer (Ulmer Verlag, Verlegerausschuss im Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels) deutlich, dass sich die Verlage Klarheit hinsichtlich des Ablieferungsverfahrens der elektronischen Pflichtexemplare wünschen, um diese in ihre Pläne zu E-Books im Jahr 2008 einbeziehen zu können. Das Ziel des Workshops bestand im Wesentlichen darin, einen Konsens bezüglich der gemeinsam getragenen Absprachen zu erzielen, die später einem erweiterten Kreis zugänglich gemacht werden sollen. Dies ist ein anspruchsvolles Ziel!
    Language
    e
  2. Hars, A.: From publishing to knowledge networks : reinventing online knowledge infrastructures (2003) 0.01 
    0.012187033 = product of:
  0.036561098 = sum of:
    0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0037603125 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
    0.032800786 = weight(_text_:k in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032800786 = score(doc=1634,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Classification
    BCA (FH K)
    GHBS
    BCA (FH K)
    Language
    e
  3. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Boyce, P.; Grayson, M.; Paulson, K.-L.: Relying an electronic journals : reading patterns of astronomers (2005) 0.01 
    0.011404618 = product of:
  0.034213852 = sum of:
    0.0063814623 = weight(_text_:e in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063814623 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
    0.027832389 = weight(_text_:k in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027832389 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Surveys of the members of the American Astronomical Society identify how astronomers use journals and what features and formats they prefer. While every work field is distinct, the patterns of use by astronomers may provide a glimpse of what to expect of journal patterns and use by other scientists. Astronomers, like other scientists, continue to invest a large amount of their time in reading articles and place a high level of importance an journal articles. They use a wide variety of formats and means to get access to materials that are essential to their work in teaching, service, and research. They select access means that are convenient-whether those means be print, electronic, or both. The availability of a mature electronic journals system from their primary professional society has surely influenced their early adoption of e-journals.
    Language
    e
  4. Internet publishing and beyond : the economics of digital information and intellectual property ; a publication of the Harvard Information Infrastructure Project in collab. with the School of Information Management and Systems at the Univ. of California at Berkeley (2000) 0.01 
    0.010861676 = product of:
  0.03258503 = sum of:
    0.0052644373 = weight(_text_:e in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052644373 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
    0.02732059 = weight(_text_:u in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02732059 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.107882105 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Editor
    Kahin, B. u. H.R. Varian
    Language
    e
  5. Susol, J.: Access to information in electronic age : situation in Slovakia (2000) 0.01 
    0.009310008 = product of:
  0.027930023 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
    0.023417648 = weight(_text_:u in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023417648 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.107882105 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Language
    e
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  6. Saltzis, K.; Dickinson, R.: Inside the changing newsroom : journalists' responses to media convergence (2008) 0.01 
    0.008984657 = product of:
  0.02695397 = sum of:
    0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0037603125 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
    0.023193657 = weight(_text_:k in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023193657 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11761237 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Language
    e
  7. Mizzaro, S.: Quality control in scholarly publishing : a new proposal (2003) 0.00 
    0.0045070197 = product of:
  0.0135210585 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
    0.009008683 = product of:
      0.027026048 = sum of:
        0.027026048 = weight(_text_:29 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027026048 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    28. 9.2003 11:29:47
    Language
    e
  8. Vaughan, K.T.L.: impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use : Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age (2003) 0.00 
    0.0045070197 = product of:
  0.0135210585 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
    0.009008683 = product of:
      0.027026048 = sum of:
        0.027026048 = weight(_text_:29 in 1873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027026048 = score(doc=1873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1873)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    19.10.2003 17:29:16
    Language
    e
  9. Kerscher, G.: DAISY Consortium : information technology for the world's blind and print-disabled population - past, present, and into the future (2001) 0.00 
    0.0045070197 = product of:
  0.0135210585 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 4810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=4810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4810)
    0.009008683 = product of:
      0.027026048 = sum of:
        0.027026048 = weight(_text_:29 in 4810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027026048 = score(doc=4810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    8. 1.2006 18:36:29
    Language
    e
  10. Medelsohn, L.D.: Chemistry journals : the transition from paper to electronic with lessons for other disciplines (2003) 0.00 
    0.004480006 = product of:
  0.0134400185 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
    0.008927643 = product of:
      0.02678293 = sum of:
        0.02678293 = weight(_text_:22 in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02678293 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    19.10.2003 17:17:22
    Language
    e
  11. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.00 
    0.004480006 = product of:
  0.0134400185 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
    0.008927643 = product of:
      0.02678293 = sum of:
        0.02678293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02678293 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25
    Language
    e
  12. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.00 
    0.004480006 = product of:
  0.0134400185 = sum of:
    0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045123748 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
    0.008927643 = product of:
      0.02678293 = sum of:
        0.02678293 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02678293 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
    Language
    e
  13. Isaac, K.A.: Future of the book : will the printed book survive the digital age? (2006) 0.00 
    0.0037558496 = product of:
  0.011267548 = sum of:
    0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0037603125 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
    0.007507236 = product of:
      0.022521708 = sum of:
        0.022521708 = weight(_text_:29 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022521708 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 18:00:05
    Language
    e
  14. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00 
    0.0025650244 = product of:
  0.007695073 = sum of:
    0.0031907312 = weight(_text_:e in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031907312 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.06737672 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
    0.0045043416 = product of:
      0.013513024 = sum of:
        0.013513024 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013513024 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11589616 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
    Language
    e
  15. Snowhill, L.: E-books and their future in academic libraries (2001) 0.00 
    0.0023213988 = product of:
  0.013928393 = sum of:
    0.013928393 = weight(_text_:e in 1218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013928393 = score(doc=1218,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.29411736 = fieldWeight in 1218, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1218)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The University of California's California Digital Library (CDL) formed an Ebook Task Force in August 2000 to evaluate academic libraries' experiences with electronic books (e-books), investigate the e-book market, and develop operating guidelines, principles and potential strategies for further exploration of the use of e-books at the University of California (UC). This article, based on the findings and recommendations of the Task Force Report, briefly summarizes task force findings, and outlines issues and recommendations for making e-books viable over the long term in the academic environment, based on the long-term goals of building strong research collections and providing high level services and collections to its users.
    Language
    e
    Object
    E-books
  16. Kling, R.; Spector, L.B.; Fortuna, J.: ¬The Real Stakes of Virtual Publishing : The Transformation of E-Biomed Into PubMed Central (2004) 0.00 
    0.0021710177 = product of:
  0.013026105 = sum of:
    0.013026105 = weight(_text_:e in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013026105 = score(doc=2096,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2750643 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In May 1999, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Harold Varmus proposed an electronic repository for biomedical research literature server called "E-biomed." E-biomed reflected the visions of scholarly electronic publishing advocates: It would be fully searchable, be free to readers, and contain full-text versions of both preprint and postpublication biomedical research articles. However, within 4 months, the E-biomed proposal was radically transformed: The preprint section was eliminated, delays were instituted between article publication and posting to the archive, and the narre was changed to "PubMed Central." This case study examines the remarkable transformation of the E-biomed proposal to PubMed Central by analyzing comments about the proposal that were posted to an online E-biomed forum created by the NIH, and discussions that took place in other face-to-face forums where E-biomed deliberations took place. We find that the transformation of the E-biomed proposal into PubMed Central was the result of highly visible and highly influential position statements made by scientific societies against the proposal. The literature about scholarly electronic publishing usually emphasizes a binary conflict between (trade) publishers and scholars/scientists. We conclude that: (1) scientific societies and the individual scientists they represent do not always have identical interests in regard to scientific e-publishing; (2) stakeholder politics and personal interests reign supreme in e-publishing debates, even in a supposedly status-free online forum; and (3) multiple communication forums must be considered in examinations of e-publishing deliberations.
    Language
    e
  17. Pinfield, S.: How do physicists use an e-print archive? : implications for institutional e-print services (2001) 0.00 
    0.001981859 = product of:
  0.011891154 = sum of:
    0.011891154 = weight(_text_:e in 1226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011891154 = score(doc=1226,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.25109822 = fieldWeight in 1226, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1226)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    It has been suggested that institutional e-print services will become an important way of achieving the wide availability of e-prints across a broad range of subject disciplines. However, as yet there are few exemplars of this sort of service. This paper describes how physicists make use of an established centralized subject-based e-prints service, arXiv (formerly known as the Los Alamos XXX service), and discusses the possible implications of this use for institutional multidisciplinary e-print archives. A number of key points are identified, including technical issues (such as file formats and user interface design), management issues (such as submission procedures and administrative staff support), economic issues (such as installation and support costs), quality issues (such as peer review and quality control criteria), policy issues (such as digital preservation and collection development standards), academic issues (such as scholarly communication cultures and publishing trends), and legal issues (such as copyright and intellectual property rights). These are discussed with reference to the project to set up a pilot institutional e-print service at the University of Nottingham, UK. This project is being used as a pragmatic way of investigating the issues surrounding institutional e-print services, particularly in seeing how flexible the e-prints model actually is and how easily it can adapt itself to disciplines other than physics.
    Language
    e
  18. Sukovic, S.: References to e-texts in academic publications (2009) 0.00 
    0.001981859 = product of:
  0.011891154 = sum of:
    0.011891154 = weight(_text_:e in 3615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011891154 = score(doc=3615,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.25109822 = fieldWeight in 3615, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3615)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore roles of electronic texts (e-texts) in research enquiry in literary and historical studies, and to deepen the understanding of the nature of scholars' engagement with e-texts as primary materials. The study includes an investigation of references to e-texts and discussions about researchers' citation practices in interviews. Design/methodology/approach - Qualitative methodology was used to explore scholars' interactions with e-texts in 30 research projects. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used to examine citations and any other acknowledgments of e-texts in participants' prepublications and published works. In-depth semi-structured interviews provided data for findings about researchers' citation practices. Findings - Formal acknowledgments of e-texts do not represent the depth and breadth of researchers' interactions with e-texts. Assessments of the relevance and trustworthiness of e-texts, as well as considerations of disciplinary cultures, had some impact on researchers' citation practices. Research limitations/implications - The study was based on in-depth data-gathering from a small group of participants. It does not have any statistical significance and the findings cannot be generalized, but comparisons with other scholars in literary and historical studies are possible. The study indicated a need for further investigation of changing academic practices in general and citation practices in particular. Practical implications - The findings have implications for the development of standards and institutional support for research in the humanities. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into the phenomenon of a very small number of citations of electronic sources in publications in the humanities, and considers issues related to citations from the perspective of changing academic cultures.
    Language
    e
  19. Ewing, J.: Predicting the future of scholarly publishing (2002) 0.00 
    0.0017548124 = product of:
  0.010528875 = sum of:
    0.010528875 = weight(_text_:e in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010528875 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Language
    e
  20. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Huntington, P.: What do faculty and students really think about e-books? (2007) 0.00 
    0.0015351413 = product of:
  0.009210847 = sum of:
    0.009210847 = weight(_text_:e in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009210847 = score(doc=824,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03294669 = queryNorm
        0.19449982 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this article is to report on a large-scale survey that was carried out to assess academic users' awareness, perceptions and existing levels of use of e-books. The survey also seeks to find out about the purposes to which electronic books were put, and to obtain an understanding of the most effective library marketing and communication channels. Design/methodology/approach - An e-mail invitation to participate in the survey was distributed to all UCL staff and students (approximately 27,000) in November 2006, and 1,818 completions were received, an effective response rate of at least 6.7 per cent. Statistical analyses were carried out on the data using Software Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Findings - The survey findings point to various ways in which user uptake and acceptance of e-books may be encouraged. Book discovery behaviour, a key issue for publishers and librarians in both print and electronic environments, emerges as a critical focus for service delivery and enhancement. Originality/value - The survey is part of an action research project, CIBER's SuperBook, that will further investigate the issues raised in this initial benchmarking survey using deep log analysis and qualitative methods. The paper partly fills the gap in the literature on e-books which has mainly focused on usage and not the users.
    Language
    e

Authors

Types

  • a 60
  • el 6
  • m 5
  • b 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications