-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.03
0.025499877 = product of:
0.050999753 = sum of:
0.050999753 = sum of:
0.007353499 = weight(_text_:e in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007353499 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.043646254 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043646254 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
- Language
- e
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Language
- e
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
- Language
- e
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.02
0.018214198 = product of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.036428396 = sum of:
0.0052524996 = weight(_text_:e in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052524996 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.031175895 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031175895 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.02
0.015441621 = product of:
0.030883241 = sum of:
0.030883241 = sum of:
0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005942525 = score(doc=3608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.024940716 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024940716 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
- Language
- e
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.02
0.015441621 = product of:
0.030883241 = sum of:
0.030883241 = sum of:
0.005942525 = weight(_text_:e in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005942525 = score(doc=4631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.024940716 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024940716 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.01
0.0145713575 = product of:
0.029142715 = sum of:
0.029142715 = sum of:
0.0042019994 = weight(_text_:e in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042019994 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.024940716 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024940716 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1611569 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
D'Ambra, J.; Wilson, C.S.; Akter, S.: Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics (2013)
0.00
0.0043551424 = product of:
0.008710285 = sum of:
0.008710285 = product of:
0.01742057 = sum of:
0.01742057 = weight(_text_:e in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01742057 = score(doc=529,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.263354 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Increasingly, e-books are becoming alternatives to print books in academic libraries, thus providing opportunities to assess how well the use of e-books meets the requirements of academics. This study uses the task-technology fit (TTF) model to explore the interrelationships of e-books, the affordances offered by smart readers, the information needs of academics, and the "fit" of technology to tasks as well as performance. We propose that the adoption of e-books will be dependent on how academics perceive the fit of this new medium to the tasks they undertake as well as what added-value functionality is delivered by the information technology that delivers the content. The study used content analysis and an online survey, administered to the faculty in Medicine, Science and Engineering at the University of New South Wales, to identify the attributes of a TTF construct of e-books in academic settings. Using exploratory factor analysis, preliminary findings confirmed annotation, navigation, and output as the core dimensions of the TTF construct. The results of confirmatory factor analysis using partial least squares path modeling supported the overall TTF model in reflecting significant positive impact of task, technology, and individual characteristics on TTF for e-books in academic settings; it also confirmed significant positive impact of TTF on individuals' performance and use, and impact of using e-books on individual performance. Our research makes two contributions: the development of an e-book TTF construct and the testing of that construct in a model validating the efficacy of the TTF framework in measuring perceived fit of e-books to academic tasks.
- Language
- e
-
Zhang, Y.; Kudva, S.: E-books versus print books : readers' choices and preferences across contexts (2014)
0.00
0.0043551424 = product of:
0.008710285 = sum of:
0.008710285 = product of:
0.01742057 = sum of:
0.01742057 = weight(_text_:e in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01742057 = score(doc=1335,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.263354 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- With electronic book (e-book) sales and readership rising, are e-books positioned to replace print books? This study examines the preference for e-books and print books in the contexts of reading purpose, reading situation, and contextual variables such as age, gender, education level, race/ethnicity, income, community type, and Internet use. In addition, this study aims to identify factors that contribute to e-book adoption. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 2,986 people in the United States from the Reading Habits Survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project (http://pewinternet.org/Shared-Content/Data-Sets/2011/December-2011--Reading-Habits.aspx). While the results of this study support the notion that e-books have firmly established a place in people's lives, due to their convenience of access, e-books are not yet positioned to replace print books. Both print books and e-books have unique attributes and serve irreplaceable functions to meet people's reading needs, which may vary by individual demographic, contextual, and situational factors. At this point, the leading significant predictors of e-book adoption are the number of books read, the individual's income, the occurrence and frequency of reading for research topics of interest, and the individual's Internet use, followed by other variables such as race/ethnicity, reading for work/school, age, and education.
- Language
- e
- Object
- E-Book
-
Erkal, E.: Allegations linking Sci-Hub with Russian intelligence (2019)
0.00
0.0037140779 = product of:
0.0074281557 = sum of:
0.0074281557 = product of:
0.0148563115 = sum of:
0.0148563115 = weight(_text_:e in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0148563115 = score(doc=4625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.22458905 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Academic publishing : No peeking (2014)
0.00
0.0036767495 = product of:
0.007353499 = sum of:
0.007353499 = product of:
0.014706998 = sum of:
0.014706998 = weight(_text_:e in 805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014706998 = score(doc=805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=805)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Martin, K.; Quan-Haase, A.: Are e-books replacing print books? : tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching (2013)
0.00
0.0032164857 = product of:
0.0064329715 = sum of:
0.0064329715 = product of:
0.012865943 = sum of:
0.012865943 = weight(_text_:e in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012865943 = score(doc=748,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19449982 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article aims to understand the adoption of e-books by academic historians for the purpose of teaching and research. This includes an investigation into their knowledge about and perceived characteristics of this evolving research tool. The study relied on Rogers's model of the innovation-decision process to guide the development of an interview guide. Ten semistructured interviews were conducted with history faculty between October 2010 and December 2011. A grounded theory approach was employed to code and analyze the data. Findings about tradition, cost, teaching innovations, and the historical research process provide the background for designing learning opportunities for the professional development of historians and the academic librarians who work with them. While historians are open to experimenting with e-books, they are also concerned about the loss of serendipity in digital environments, the lack of availability of key resources, and the need for technological transparency. The findings show that Rogers's knowledge and persuasion stages are cyclical in nature, with scholars moving back and forth between these two stages. Participants interviewed were already weighing the five characteristics of the persuasion stage without having much knowledge about e-books. The study findings have implications for our understanding of the diffusion of innovations in academia: both print and digital collections are being used in parallel without one replacing the other.
- Language
- e
-
Fallaw, C.; Dunham, E.; Wickes, E.; Strong, D.; Stein, A.; Zhang, Q.; Rimkus, K.; ill Ingram, B.; Imker, H.J.: Overly honest data repository development (2016)
0.00
0.0031841588 = product of:
0.0063683176 = sum of:
0.0063683176 = product of:
0.012736635 = sum of:
0.012736635 = weight(_text_:e in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012736635 = score(doc=3371,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19254501 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Dobránszki, J.: Do open access data files represent an academic Risk? (2015)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 2253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=2253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 2253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Kliegl, R.: ¬A vision of scientific communication (2016)
0.00
0.0031514994 = product of:
0.006302999 = sum of:
0.006302999 = product of:
0.012605998 = sum of:
0.012605998 = weight(_text_:e in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012605998 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Rodrigues, R.S.; Abadal, E.: Scientific journals in Brazil and Spain : alternative publishing models (2014)
0.00
0.0022284468 = product of:
0.0044568935 = sum of:
0.0044568935 = product of:
0.008913787 = sum of:
0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008913787 = score(doc=1504,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Salminen, A.; Jauhiainen, E.; Nurmeksela, R.: ¬A life cycle model of XML documents (2014)
0.00
0.0022284468 = product of:
0.0044568935 = sum of:
0.0044568935 = product of:
0.008913787 = sum of:
0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 1553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008913787 = score(doc=1553,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1553, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1553)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Hu, B.; Dong, X.; Zhang, C.; Bowman, T.D.; Ding, Y.; Milojevic, S.; Ni, C.; Yan, E.; Larivière, V.: ¬A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications (2015)
0.00
0.0022284468 = product of:
0.0044568935 = sum of:
0.0044568935 = product of:
0.008913787 = sum of:
0.008913787 = weight(_text_:e in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008913787 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015)
0.00
0.0021009997 = product of:
0.0042019994 = sum of:
0.0042019994 = product of:
0.008403999 = sum of:
0.008403999 = weight(_text_:e in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008403999 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06614887 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.04602077 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
