-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.03
0.025414936 = product of:
0.050829872 = sum of:
0.050829872 = product of:
0.101659745 = sum of:
0.101659745 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101659745 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06252774 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010)
0.02
0.016263526 = product of:
0.032527052 = sum of:
0.032527052 = product of:
0.09758115 = sum of:
0.09758115 = weight(_text_:objects in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09758115 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33233938 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06252774 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Social tagging systems, known as "folksonomies," represent an important part of web resource discovery as they enable free and unrestricted browsing through information space. Folksonomies consisting of subject designators (tags) assigned by users, however, have one important drawback: they do not express semantic relationships, either hierarchical or associative, between tags. As a consequence, the use of tags to browse information resources requires moving from one resource to another, based on coincidence and not on the pre-established meaningful or logical connections that may exist between related resources. We suggest that the semantic structure of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) may be used in complementing and supporting tag-based browsing. In this work, two specific questions were investigated: 1) Are terms used as tags in folksonomies included in the UDC?; and, 2) Which facets of UDC match the characteristics of documents or information objects that are tagged in folksonomies? A collection of the most popular tags from Amazon, LibraryThing, Delicious, and 43Things was investigated. The universal nature of UDC was examined through the universality of topics and facets covering diverse human interests which are at the same time interconnected and form a rich and intricate semantic structure. The results suggest that UDC-supported folksonomies could be implemented in resource discovery, in particular in library portals and catalogues.
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009)
0.02
0.015406529 = product of:
0.030813059 = sum of:
0.030813059 = product of:
0.061626118 = sum of:
0.061626118 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061626118 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2952815 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.06252774 = queryNorm
0.20870294 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.014975895 = product of:
0.02995179 = sum of:
0.02995179 = product of:
0.05990358 = sum of:
0.05990358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05990358 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06252774 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.01
0.012707468 = product of:
0.025414936 = sum of:
0.025414936 = product of:
0.050829872 = sum of:
0.050829872 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050829872 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06252774 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.010589557 = product of:
0.021179114 = sum of:
0.021179114 = product of:
0.042358227 = sum of:
0.042358227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042358227 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21896149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06252774 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
