Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloguing in Thai libraries (2000) 0.00 
    0.0029719393 = product of:
  0.03566327 = sum of:
    0.014641492 = product of:
      0.043924473 = sum of:
        0.043924473 = weight(_text_:p in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043924473 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.021021776 = product of:
      0.04204355 = sum of:
        0.04204355 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04204355 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35
  2. McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003) 0.00 
    0.0024286918 = product of:
  0.019429535 = sum of:
    0.005960879 = weight(_text_:und in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005960879 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
    0.0075077773 = product of:
      0.015015555 = sum of:
        0.015015555 = weight(_text_:29 in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015015555 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.005960879 = weight(_text_:und in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005960879 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
  0.125 = coord(3/24)
    Date
    17. 8.2003 19:29:15
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.4, S.182-187
  3. Dunsire, G.: Integrating Dublin Core / RDF records with MARC21 via the OCLC Connexion service at the Centre for Digital Library Research (2003) 0.00 
    0.0011921758 = product of:
  0.0143061085 = sum of:
    0.0071530542 = weight(_text_:und in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071530542 = score(doc=1497,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
    0.0071530542 = weight(_text_:und in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0071530542 = score(doc=1497,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.4, S.188-192
  4. Schottlaender, B.E.C.: Why metadata? Why now? Why me? (2003) 0.00 
    7.078401E-4 = product of:
  0.016988162 = sum of:
    0.016988162 = product of:
      0.033976324 = sum of:
        0.033976324 = weight(_text_:29 in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033976324 = score(doc=5513,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:34:29
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.19-29
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.00 
    7.0147257E-4 = product of:
  0.016835341 = sum of:
    0.016835341 = product of:
      0.033670682 = sum of:
        0.033670682 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033670682 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  6. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.00 
    4.96016E-4 = product of:
  0.011904384 = sum of:
    0.011904384 = product of:
      0.023808768 = sum of:
        0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023808768 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Lam, V.-T.: Cataloging Internet resources : Why, what, how (2000) 0.00 
    4.3795368E-4 = product of:
  0.010510888 = sum of:
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.49-61
  8. Boydston, J.M.K.; Leysen, J.M.: Observations on the catalogers' role in descriptive metadata creation in academic libraries (2006) 0.00 
    4.3795368E-4 = product of:
  0.010510888 = sum of:
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    5. 1.2007 9:32:29
  9. Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description (EAD) (2009) 0.00 
    3.8775563E-4 = product of:
  0.009306135 = sum of:
    0.009306135 = weight(_text_:des in 3777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009306135 = score(doc=3777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 3777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3777)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Abstract
    Encoded Archival Description (EAD) is an international digital standard based on Extensible Markup Language (XML) for encoding descriptions of archival records. People living their lives as individuals, as members of families, and as members of corporate bodies create and assemble records that serve as instruments for carrying out or documenting the performance of activities. Based on the archival principles of respect des fonds (or provenance) and original order, archivists traditionally have treated all of the records created and assembled by one individual, family, or corporate body as a collection or fonds. Archivists describe records as an essential part of their responsibility for preserving and facilitating access to and use of archives. Archival description provides information essential for establishing the authenticity and completeness of fonds, and serves effective administration, discovery, access, and understanding of records. Traditionally archivists have described each fonds hierarchically in a single apparatus commonly called a finding aid. Until the advent of computing, finding aids were typically in printed form. In the 1990s, archivists created EAD, an encoding standard for archival description. EAD is based technologically on XML and intellectually on General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)), a descriptive framework developed by the International Council of Archives (ICA). As with all standards, EAD will continue to develop in the future. Future changes to EAD will be influenced by ICA descriptive standards that complement ISAD(G) and encoding standards based on them that will complement EAD. This entry is organized into six sections: introduction, archival records, archival description, EAD, history, and future.
  10. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metadata education : asserting a central role in information organization (2002) 0.00 
    3.7538886E-4 = product of:
  0.009009332 = sum of:
    0.009009332 = product of:
      0.018018665 = sum of:
        0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018018665 = score(doc=5457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    29. 7.2006 17:58:51
  11. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.00 
    3.1001001E-4 = product of:
  0.00744024 = sum of:
    0.00744024 = product of:
      0.01488048 = sum of:
        0.01488048 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01488048 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.00 
    3.1001001E-4 = product of:
  0.00744024 = sum of:
    0.00744024 = product of:
      0.01488048 = sum of:
        0.01488048 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01488048 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005) 0.00 
    8.715174E-5 = product of:
  0.0020916418 = sum of:
    0.0020916418 = product of:
      0.006274925 = sum of:
        0.006274925 = weight(_text_:p in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006274925 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.079450354 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Footnote
    Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."

Authors

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications