Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012) 0.02
    0.02336903 = product of:
      0.04673806 = sum of:
        0.04673806 = product of:
          0.09347612 = sum of:
            0.09347612 = weight(_text_:books in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09347612 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.37758467 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
  2. Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011) 0.02
    0.023134157 = product of:
      0.046268314 = sum of:
        0.046268314 = product of:
          0.09253663 = sum of:
            0.09253663 = weight(_text_:books in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09253663 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
  3. Derrot, S.; Koskas, M.: My fair metadata : cataloging legal deposit Ebooks at the National Library of France (2016) 0.02
    0.023134157 = product of:
      0.046268314 = sum of:
        0.046268314 = product of:
          0.09253663 = sum of:
            0.09253663 = weight(_text_:books in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09253663 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    French law on digital legal deposit covers websites and online content as well as ebooks. It imposes no obligation to produce a bibliography, indexing being sufficient. But despite their innovative characteristics, ebooks are still books, and their metadata is closer to that of printed materials than to the web indexing. To set up an ebook deposit workflow, the BnF benefits from its experience with digital documents and its tradition of legal deposit. This is to present the questions that it faces when dealing with the cataloging of ebooks and the management of their metadata, and the solutions that are emerging.
  4. Farneth, D.: How can we achieve GLAM? : Understanding and overcoming the challenges to integrating metadata across museums, archives, and libraries: Part 2 (2016) 0.02
    0.019829279 = product of:
      0.039658558 = sum of:
        0.039658558 = product of:
          0.079317115 = sum of:
            0.079317115 = weight(_text_:books in 5130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079317115 = score(doc=5130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 5130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This IFLA Rare Books and Special Collections Section presentation and discussion grew out of a panel discussion of the same title held at CIDOC's annual meeting in September, 2015. Ideas drawn from the panel discussion were presented to IFLA participants for further commentary. The author prefaces the open discussion with brief contextual information about how the library, archives, and museums sectors are addressing the challenge of metadata integration. Megan Phillips, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, leads an open discussion, an edited transcript of which forms the main part of this article.
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.019629175 = product of:
      0.03925835 = sum of:
        0.03925835 = product of:
          0.0785167 = sum of:
            0.0785167 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0785167 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  6. McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003) 0.02
    0.0165244 = product of:
      0.0330488 = sum of:
        0.0330488 = product of:
          0.0660976 = sum of:
            0.0660976 = weight(_text_:books in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0660976 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.2669927 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress (LC) has many of the same challenges as other libraries, especially large ones. LC has many different types of resources - books, journals, maps, music, manuscripts, audio, moving image, still image, artifacts, electronic - with large collections of each. Different levels of access are needed for this material: for some, collection level bibliographic description is adequate; for many, item level access is adequate; but for others, such as sound recordings, analytic, or sub unit access is highly desirable.The sizes of the LC collections are a major challenge - over 125 million non-electronic and over 3 million electronic items (and growing rapidly). And finally, electronic resources are presenting us with new issues - from metadata to preservation to storage to linking techniques. LC has tried to approach these challenges from a service perspective. Access must be successful for the end user, which mandates as much coherence and consistency in the metadata as possible and access systems that are easy to use. This paper focuses an the Library of Congress' perspective an metadata in the following three areas: (1) descriptive metadata in our current operations, (2) pathways that are developing that will support possible evolution in the future, and (3) broader metadata needs with digital material. The discussion is from a metadata element set and format point of view, not a cataloging data and cataloging rules view. Most acronyms used in this paper are expanded in an Appendix.
  7. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01
    0.013879923 = product of:
      0.027759846 = sum of:
        0.027759846 = product of:
          0.055519693 = sum of:
            0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055519693 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
  8. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.01
    0.013879923 = product of:
      0.027759846 = sum of:
        0.027759846 = product of:
          0.055519693 = sum of:
            0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055519693 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  9. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.01
    0.013879923 = product of:
      0.027759846 = sum of:
        0.027759846 = product of:
          0.055519693 = sum of:
            0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055519693 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01
    0.0121449325 = product of:
      0.024289865 = sum of:
        0.024289865 = product of:
          0.04857973 = sum of:
            0.04857973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04857973 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.01
    0.010409942 = product of:
      0.020819884 = sum of:
        0.020819884 = product of:
          0.041639768 = sum of:
            0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041639768 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.01
    0.008674952 = product of:
      0.017349904 = sum of:
        0.017349904 = product of:
          0.03469981 = sum of:
            0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03469981 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01
    0.008674952 = product of:
      0.017349904 = sum of:
        0.017349904 = product of:
          0.03469981 = sum of:
            0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03469981 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051222645 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22