Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016) 0.01 
    0.010695906 = product of:
  0.058827482 = sum of:
    0.0070290747 = product of:
      0.014058149 = sum of:
        0.014058149 = weight(_text_:29 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014058149 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0042042066 = weight(_text_:in in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0042042066 = score(doc=731,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
    0.03716614 = weight(_text_:computer in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03716614 = score(doc=731,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.4945153 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
    0.010428062 = product of:
      0.020856123 = sum of:
        0.020856123 = weight(_text_:science in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020856123 = score(doc=731,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.38499892 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    This book offers a comprehensive guide to the world of metadata, from its origins in the ancient cities of the Middle East, to the Semantic Web of today. The author takes us on a journey through the centuries-old history of metadata up to the modern world of crowdsourcing and Google, showing how metadata works and what it is made of. The author explores how it has been used ideologically and how it can never be objective. He argues how central it is to human cultures and the way they develop. Metadata: Shaping Knowledge from Antiquity to the Semantic Web is for all readers with an interest in how we humans organize our knowledge and why this is important. It is suitable for those new to the subject as well as those know its basics. It also makes an excellent introduction for students of information science and librarianship.
    Date
    29. 9.2022 17:43:42
    LCSH
    Computer science
    Library science
    Computer applications in arts and humanities
    Popular computer science
    Subject
    Computer science
    Library science
    Computer applications in arts and humanities
    Popular computer science
  2. Wisser, K.: ¬The errors of our ways : using metadata quality research to understand common error patterns in the application of name headings (2014) 0.01 
    0.006621323 = product of:
  0.036417276 = sum of:
    0.008434889 = product of:
      0.016869778 = sum of:
        0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869778 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050450475 = score(doc=1574,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
    0.018207615 = weight(_text_:computer in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018207615 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
    0.0047297236 = product of:
      0.009459447 = sum of:
        0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009459447 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    Using data culled during a metadata quality research project for the Social Network and Archival Context (SNAC) project, this article discusses common errors and problems in the use of standardized languages, specifically unambiguous names for persons and corporate bodies. Errors such as misspelling, qualifiers, format, and miss-encoding point to several areas where quality control measures can improve aggregation of data. Results from a large data set indicate that there are predictable problems that can be retrospectively corrected before aggregation. This research looked specifically at name formation and expression in metadata records, but the errors detected could be extended to other controlled vocabularies as well.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  3. Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014) 0.01 
    0.006621323 = product of:
  0.036417276 = sum of:
    0.008434889 = product of:
      0.016869778 = sum of:
        0.016869778 = weight(_text_:29 in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016869778 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050450475 = score(doc=1589,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
    0.018207615 = weight(_text_:computer in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018207615 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24226204 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
    0.0047297236 = product of:
      0.009459447 = sum of:
        0.009459447 = weight(_text_:science in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009459447 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    Integration of library data into the Linked Data environment is a key issue in libraries and is approached on the basis of interoperability between library data conceptual models. Achieving interoperability for different representations of the same or related entities between the library and cultural heritage domains shall enhance rich bibliographic data reusability and support the development of new data-driven information services. This paper aims to contribute to the desired interoperability by attempting to map core semantic paths between the BIBFRAME and EDM conceptual models. BIBFRAME is developed by the Library of Congress to support transformation of legacy library data in MARC format into linked data. EDM is the model developed for and used in the Europeana Cultural Heritage aggregation portal.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 478
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  4. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.01 
    0.0062999404 = product of:
  0.06929934 = sum of:
    0.06420201 = weight(_text_:notes in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06420201 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.58433783 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.0050973296 = weight(_text_:in in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050973296 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
  5. Biesenbender, S.; Tobias, R.: Rolle und Aufgaben von Bibliotheken im Umfeld des Kerndatensatz Forschung (2019) 0.01 
    0.0056524314 = product of:
  0.041451164 = sum of:
    0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018941889 = score(doc=5350,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
    0.018941889 = weight(_text_:und in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018941889 = score(doc=5350,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
    0.0035673876 = weight(_text_:in in 5350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0035673876 = score(doc=5350,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5350, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5350)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird die Frage aufgegriffen, welche Auswirkungen der Kerndatensatz Forschung (KDSF) auf die aktuelle bibliothekarische Praxis haben kann. Dabei wird eine Bestandsaufnahme der (möglichen) Betätigungsfelder von Bibliotheken rund um den KDSF und die Einführung von Forschungsinformationssystemen (FIS) gezogen. Es sollen die Herausforderungen und das Potenzial des KDSF für die tägliche bibliothekarische Praxis im Rahmen einer modernen und integrierten Forschungsberichterstattung beleuchtet und Impulse für in der Zukunft erforderliche Anpassungsprozesse gegeben werden. Der Artikel stellt Aufbau und Konzept des KDSF vor. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf dem Kerndatensatz-Bereich "Publikationen". Bisherige Erfahrungen und Rückmeldungen an den "Helpdesk für die Einführung des Kerndatensatz Forschung" werden aus bibliothekarischer Sicht erörtert. Ein weiterer Teil zeigt beispielhafte Aktivitäten und Herangehensweisen, die sich für Bibliotheken im Umfeld der Einführung von FIS ergeben.
  6. McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003) 0.00 
    0.0042435946 = product of:
  0.023339769 = sum of:
    0.0055808076 = weight(_text_:und in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055808076 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
    0.0055808076 = weight(_text_:und in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055808076 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
    0.0070290747 = product of:
      0.014058149 = sum of:
        0.014058149 = weight(_text_:29 in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014058149 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.00514908 = weight(_text_:in in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00514908 = score(doc=1760,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
  0.18181819 = coord(4/22)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress (LC) has many of the same challenges as other libraries, especially large ones. LC has many different types of resources - books, journals, maps, music, manuscripts, audio, moving image, still image, artifacts, electronic - with large collections of each. Different levels of access are needed for this material: for some, collection level bibliographic description is adequate; for many, item level access is adequate; but for others, such as sound recordings, analytic, or sub unit access is highly desirable.The sizes of the LC collections are a major challenge - over 125 million non-electronic and over 3 million electronic items (and growing rapidly). And finally, electronic resources are presenting us with new issues - from metadata to preservation to storage to linking techniques. LC has tried to approach these challenges from a service perspective. Access must be successful for the end user, which mandates as much coherence and consistency in the metadata as possible and access systems that are easy to use. This paper focuses an the Library of Congress' perspective an metadata in the following three areas: (1) descriptive metadata in our current operations, (2) pathways that are developing that will support possible evolution in the future, and (3) broader metadata needs with digital material. The discussion is from a metadata element set and format point of view, not a cataloging data and cataloging rules view. Most acronyms used in this paper are expanded in an Appendix.
    Date
    17. 8.2003 19:29:15
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.4, S.182-187
  7. Electronic cataloging : AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs (2003) 0.00 
    0.0041949973 = product of:
  0.030763311 = sum of:
    0.022698836 = weight(_text_:notes in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022698836 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10987139 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.20659462 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3425174 = idf(docFreq=574, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
    0.0053054686 = weight(_text_:in in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053054686 = score(doc=3082,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18965527 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
    0.0027590056 = product of:
      0.0055180113 = sum of:
        0.0055180113 = weight(_text_:science in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055180113 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.101861134 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    Electronic Cataloging is the undertaking of three pioneers in library science: Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary L. Larsgaard, who co-edited Maps and Related Cartographic Materials: Cataloging Classification, and Bibliographic Control (Haworth, 2000). With illustrations, references, additional reading lists, and case studies, this research tool offers you tips and strategies to make metadata work for you and your library. No one currently involved in information cataloging should be without this book! For a complete list of contents, visit our Web site at www.HaworthPress.com. Electronic Cataloging: AACR2 and Metadata for Serials and Monographs is a collection of papers about recent developments in metadata and its practical applications in cataloging. Acknowledged experts examine a wide variety of techniques for managing serials and monographs using standards and schemas like MARC, AACR2, ISSN, ISBD, and Dublin Core. From the broadest introduction of metadata usage to the revisions of AACR2 through 2000, this book offers vital analysis and strategy for achieving Universal Bibliographic Control. Electronic Cataloging is divided into three parts. The first is an introduction to metadata, what it is, and its relationship to the library in general. The second portion focuses in more an how metadata can be utilized by a library system and the possibilities in the near future. The third portion is very specific, dealing with individual standards of metadata and elements, such as AACR2 and MARC, as well as current policies and prospects for the future. Information covered in Electronic Cataloging includes: an overview of metadata and seriality and why it is important to the cataloging community Universal Bibliographic Control: what has succeeded so far in cataloging and how metadata will evolve the step-by-step process for creating an effective metadata repository for the community the inherent problems that accompany cataloging nonprint research materials, such as electronic serials and the Web metadata schemas and the use of controlled vocabularies and classification systems standards of metadata, including MARC, Dublin Core, RDF, and AACR2, with emphasis an the revisions and efforts made with AACR2 through 2000 an overview of the ISSN (International Serials Standard Number) and its relationships to current codes and metadata standards, including AACR2 and much more!
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Editors' Introduction (Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary Lynette Larsgaard) PART 1. Cataloging in an Electronic Age (Michael Gorman) Why Metadata? Why Me? Why Now? (Brian E. C. Schottlaender) PART 2. Developing a Metadata Strategy (Grace Agnew) Practical Issues in Applying Metadata Schemas and Controlled Vocabularies to Cultural Heritage Information (Murtha Baca) Digital Resources and Metadata Application in the Shanghai Library (Yuanliang Ma and Wei Liu) Struggling Toward Retrieval: Alternatives to Standard Operating Procedures Can Help Librarians and the Public (Sheila S. Intner) PART 3. AACR2 and Other Metadata Standards: The Way Forward (Ann Huthwaite) AACR2 and Metadata: Library Opportunities in the Global Semantic Web (Barbara B. Tillett) Seriality: What Have We Accomplished? What's Next? (Jean Hirons) MARC and Mark-Up (Erik Jul) ISSN: Dumb Number, Smart Solution (Regina Romano Reynolds) Index Reference Notes Included
  8. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.00 
    0.0034787874 = product of:
  0.03826666 = sum of:
    0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003363365 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
    0.034903295 = sum of:
      0.012612597 = weight(_text_:science in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012612597 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.0222907 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0222907 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.00 
    0.00261695 = product of:
  0.028786449 = sum of:
    0.006971888 = weight(_text_:in in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006971888 = score(doc=138,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.24922498 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
    0.02181456 = sum of:
      0.0078828735 = weight(_text_:science in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0078828735 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.013931687 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013931687 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02056547 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012) 0.00 
    0.0024391378 = product of:
  0.01788701 = sum of:
    0.007892453 = weight(_text_:und in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007892453 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
    0.007892453 = weight(_text_:und in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007892453 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
    0.0021021033 = weight(_text_:in in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0021021033 = score(doc=2086,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    An overview of the field of information organization that examines resource description as both a product and process of the contemporary digital environment. This timely book employs the unifying mechanism of the semantic web and the resource description framework to integrate the various traditions and practices of information and knowledge organization. Uniquely, it covers both the domain-specific traditions and practices and the practices of the 'metadata movement' through a single lens - that of resource description in the broadest, semantic web sense. This approach more readily accommodates coverage of the new Resource Description and Access (RDA) standard, which aims to move library cataloguing into the centre of the semantic web. The work surrounding RDA looks set to revolutionise the field of information organization, and this book will bring both the standard and its model and concepts into focus.
    BK
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
    Classification
    06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
  11. Dunsire, G.: Integrating Dublin Core / RDF records with MARC21 via the OCLC Connexion service at the Centre for Digital Library Research (2003) 0.00 
    0.002422238 = product of:
  0.017763078 = sum of:
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=1497,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
    0.006696969 = weight(_text_:und in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006696969 = score(doc=1497,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04558063 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
    0.0043691397 = weight(_text_:in in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043691397 = score(doc=1497,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the use of OCLC's Connexion service (formerly CORC) by the Centre for Digital Library Research at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland. The Centre has completed, and is currently engaged in, a number of research projects involving the application of Dublin Core and MARC21 in creating metadata for digital resources; these include projects an the Glasgow Digital Library, East Dunbartonshire local history, and a pilot Scottish Cultural Portal.The Connexion service provides a MARC21-DC converter, and the Centre has been investigating its incorporation in workflows for creating and maintaining digital libraries. This has included the use of databases to store metadata, with subsequent output to Dublin Core and conversion to MARC21.
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.4, S.188-192
  12. McCue, J.A.: Why should a cataloging department hire a metadata specialist? : and, are there any out there? (1997) 0.00 
    0.0023945044 = product of:
  0.026339548 = sum of:
    0.0050973296 = weight(_text_:in in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050973296 = score(doc=2982,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
    0.021242218 = weight(_text_:computer in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021242218 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.28263903 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    Addresses the question of why a technical services department would hire a metadata specialist and whether a metadata specialist is really a cataloguer in disguise. Evidence suggests that cataoguing departments are recruiting and training staff for positions requiring broader computer experience and an awareness of larger metadata issues. Also explores whether students are attracted to these positions and whether library schools are preparing technical services staff for these challenges
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the USAIN/IAALD Joint Conference held in tuscon, Arizona, 3-5 April 1997, the theme of which was 'The information frontier: linking people and resources in a changing world'
  13. Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997) 0.00 
    0.002393566 = product of:
  0.026329225 = sum of:
    0.016869778 = product of:
      0.033739556 = sum of:
        0.033739556 = weight(_text_:29 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033739556 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009459447 = product of:
      0.018918894 = sum of:
        0.018918894 = weight(_text_:science in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018918894 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1997) no.1, Oct./Nov., S.4-29
  14. Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloguing in Thai libraries (2000) 0.00 
    0.0023242997 = product of:
  0.025567295 = sum of:
    0.019681407 = product of:
      0.039362814 = sum of:
        0.039362814 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039362814 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0058858884 = weight(_text_:in in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058858884 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35
  15. Schottlaender, B.E.C.: Why metadata? Why now? Why me? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0018783178 = product of:
  0.020661496 = sum of:
    0.01590498 = product of:
      0.03180996 = sum of:
        0.03180996 = weight(_text_:29 in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03180996 = score(doc=5513,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 5513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004756517 = score(doc=5513,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5513, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5513)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    Provides an introductory overview to the subject of metadata, which considers why metadata issues are central to discussions about the evolution of library services-particularly digital library services-and why the cataloging community is, and should be, front and center in those discussions.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:34:29
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.19-29
  16. Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005) 0.00 
    0.0018196182 = product of:
  0.013343866 = sum of:
    0.0050450475 = weight(_text_:in in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050450475 = score(doc=339,freq=72.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          8.485281 = tf(freq=72.0), with freq of:
            72.0 = termFreq=72.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
    0.0060692052 = weight(_text_:computer in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060692052 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0751567 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.08075401 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6545093 = idf(docFreq=3109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
    0.0022296133 = product of:
      0.0044592265 = sum of:
        0.0044592265 = weight(_text_:science in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044592265 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0541719 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.08231623 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13636364 = coord(3/22)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.
    Other selected specialized metadata element sets or schemas, such as Government Information Locator Service (GILS), are presented. Attention is brought to the different sets of elements and the need for linking up these elements across metadata schemes from a semantic point of view. It is no surprise, then, that after the presentation of additional specialized sets of metadata from the educational community and the arts sector, attention is turned to the discussion of Crosswalks between metadata element sets or the mapping of one metadata standard to another. Finally, the five appendices detailing elements found in Dublin Core, GILS, ARIADNE versions 3 and 3. 1, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art are an excellent addition to this chapter's focus on metadata and communities of practice. Chapters 3-6 provide an up-to-date account of the use of metadata standards in Libraries from the point of view of a community of practice. Some of the content standards included in these four chapters are AACR2, Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), and Library of Congress Subject Classification. In addition, uses of MARC along with planned implementations of the archival community's encoding scheme, EAD, are covered in detail. In a way, content in these chapters can be considered as a refresher course on the history, current state, importance, and usefulness of the above-mentioned standards in Libraries. Application of the standards is offered for various types of materials, such as monographic materials, continuing resources, and integrating library metadata into local catalogs and databases. A review of current digital library projects takes place in Chapter 7. While details about these projects tend to become out of date fast, the sections on issues and problems encountered in digital projects and successes and failures deserve any reader's close inspection. A suggested model is important enough to merit a specific mention below, in a short list format, as it encapsulates lessons learned from issues, problems, successes, and failures in digital projects. Before detailing the model, however, the various projects included in Chapter 7 should be mentioned. The projects are: Colorado Digitization Project, Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (an Office of Research project by OCLC, Inc.), California Digital Library, JSTOR, LC's National Digital Library Program and VARIATIONS.
    Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."
    Series
    Library and information science text series
  17. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.00 
    0.001738661 = product of:
  0.01912527 = sum of:
    0.003363365 = weight(_text_:in in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003363365 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.015761904 = product of:
      0.03152381 = sum of:
        0.03152381 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03152381 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.072016776 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  18. Revelli, C.: Integrare o sostituire? : Un dilemma per la norme catalografiche (1997) 0.00 
    0.0016435283 = product of:
  0.018078811 = sum of:
    0.0139168585 = product of:
      0.027833717 = sum of:
        0.027833717 = weight(_text_:29 in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027833717 = score(doc=1624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004161952 = weight(_text_:in in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004161952 = score(doc=1624,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    Discusses a range of professional librarians' opinions on the urgent need either to adopt or replace the current cataloguing rules, a theme closely linked to the identity crisis facing libraries and librarians in the online electronic era. Topics examined include: Gorman and Oddy's views on restructuring AACR principles; the 13 metadata elements contained in the Dublin Core document (1995); catalogue search by known item; keyword search versus subject search; and the US Library of Congress's Program for cooperation cataloging
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    29. 7.1998 10:28:48
  19. Boydston, J.M.K.; Leysen, J.M.: Observations on the catalogers' role in descriptive metadata creation in academic libraries (2006) 0.00 
    0.001492848 = product of:
  0.016421327 = sum of:
    0.009840704 = product of:
      0.019681407 = sum of:
        0.019681407 = weight(_text_:29 in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019681407 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0065806243 = weight(_text_:in in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065806243 = score(doc=232,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Abstract
    This article examines the case for the participation of catalogers in the creation of descriptive metadata. Metadata creation is an extension of the catalogers' existing skills, abilities, and knowledge. As such, it should be encouraged and supported. However, issues in this process, such as cost, supply of catalogers, and the need for further training will also be examined. The authors use examples from the literature and their own experiences in descriptive metadata creation. Suggestions for future research on the topic are included.
    Date
    5. 1.2007 9:32:29
  20. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.00 
    0.0014548214 = product of:
  0.016003035 = sum of:
    0.011246519 = product of:
      0.022493038 = sum of:
        0.022493038 = weight(_text_:29 in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022493038 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.072342895 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02056547 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004756517 = weight(_text_:in in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004756517 = score(doc=1561,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.027974274 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02056547 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.09090909 = coord(2/22)
    Content
    The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1997, May/June, S.28-29

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 63
  • m 4
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications