Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. BIBFRAME Relationships (2014) 0.01
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.013528543 = sum of:
        0.013528543 = product of:
          0.040585626 = sum of:
            0.040585626 = weight(_text_:12 in 8920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040585626 = score(doc=8920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.30558768 = fieldWeight in 8920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8920)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2.12.2015 12:51:09
  2. Forero, D.; Peterson, N.; Hamilton, A.: Building an institutional author search tool (2019) 0.01
    0.006696287 = product of:
      0.013392574 = sum of:
        0.013392574 = product of:
          0.04017772 = sum of:
            0.04017772 = weight(_text_:12 in 5441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04017772 = score(doc=5441,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.30251637 = fieldWeight in 5441, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5441)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 8.2019 12:55:11
  3. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.01
    0.0065057995 = product of:
      0.013011599 = sum of:
        0.013011599 = product of:
          0.039034795 = sum of:
            0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039034795 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  4. Edmunds, J.: Roadmap to nowhere : BIBFLOW, BIBFRAME, and linked data for libraries (2017) 0.01
    0.005739675 = product of:
      0.01147935 = sum of:
        0.01147935 = product of:
          0.034438048 = sum of:
            0.034438048 = weight(_text_:12 in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034438048 = score(doc=3523,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.25929976 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    On December 12, 2016, Carl Stahmer and MacKenzie Smith presented at the CNI Members Fall Meeting about the BIBFLOW project, self-described on Twitter as "a two-year project of the UC Davis University Library and Zepheira investigating the future of library technical services." In her opening remarks, Ms. Smith, University Librarian at UC Davis, stated that one of the goals of the project was to devise a roadmap "to get from where we are today, which is kind of the 1970s with a little lipstick on it, to 2020, which is where we're going to be very soon." The notion that where libraries are today is somehow behind the times is one of the commonly heard rationales behind a move to linked data. Stated more precisely: - Libraries devote considerable time and resources to producing high-quality bibliographic metadata - This metadata is stored in unconnected silos - This metadata is in a format (MARC) that is incompatible with technologies of the emerging Semantic Web - The visibility of library metadata is diminished as a result of the two points above Are these assertions true? If yes, is linked data the solution?
    Date
    24. 4.2017 12:53:51
  5. RDA Toolkit (5 - Juni 2018) (2018) 0.01
    0.005411417 = product of:
      0.010822834 = sum of:
        0.010822834 = product of:
          0.0324685 = sum of:
            0.0324685 = weight(_text_:12 in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0324685 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2018 12:59:32
  6. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.00
    0.0047349897 = product of:
      0.009469979 = sum of:
        0.009469979 = product of:
          0.028409937 = sum of:
            0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028409937 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:26:29
  7. RDA Toolkit (4) : Dezember 2017 (2017) 0.00
    0.0038264496 = product of:
      0.0076528993 = sum of:
        0.0076528993 = product of:
          0.022958698 = sum of:
            0.022958698 = weight(_text_:12 in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022958698 = score(doc=4283,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.1728665 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 12. Dezember 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits erschienen. Dabei gab es, aufgrund des 3R-Projekts (RDA Toolkit Restruction and Redesign Project), keine inhaltlichen Änderungen am RDA-Text. Es wurden ausschließlich die Übersetzungen in finnischer und französischer Sprache, ebenso wie die dazugehörigen Policy statements, aktualisiert. Für den deutschsprachigen Raum wurden in der Übersetzung zwei Beziehungskennzeichnungen geändert: Im Anhang I.2.2 wurde die Änderung von "Sponsor" zu "Träger" wieder rückgängig gemacht. In Anhang K.2.3 wurde "Sponsor" zu "Person als Sponsor" geändert. Außerdem wurde die Übersetzung der Anwendungsrichtlinien (D-A-CH AWR) ins Französische aktualisiert. Dies ist das vorletzte Release vor dem Rollout des neuen Toolkits. Das letzte Release im Januar/Februar 2018 wird die norwegische Übersetzung enthalten. Im Juni 2018 wird das RDA Toolkit ein Relaunch erfahren und mit einer neuen Oberfläche erscheinen. Dieser beinhaltet ein Redesign der Toolkit-Oberfläche und die inhaltliche Anpassung des Standards RDA an das Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM) sowie die künftige stärkere Ausrichtung auf die aktuellen technischen Möglichkeiten. Zunächst wird im Juni 2018 die englische Originalausgabe der RDA in der neuen Form erscheinen. Alle Übersetzungen werden in einer Übergangszeit angepasst. Hierfür wird die alte Version des RDA Toolkit für ein weiteres Jahr zur Verfügung gestellt. Der Stand Dezember 2017 der deutschen Ausgabe und die D-A-CH-Anwendungsrichtlinien bleiben bis zur Anpassung eingefroren. Nähere Information zum Rollout finden Sie unter dem folgenden Link<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/3Rproject/SR3>. [Inetbib vom 13.12.2017]
    Date
    11. 6.2018 13:17:12
  8. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.00
    0.0033821356 = product of:
      0.0067642713 = sum of:
        0.0067642713 = product of:
          0.020292813 = sum of:
            0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020292813 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.10.2017 12:51:19