Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.04
    0.03879708 = product of:
      0.15518832 = sum of:
        0.15518832 = sum of:
          0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11066689 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04694356 = queryNorm
              0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04452143 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04694356 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
  2. Barnett, J.B.: Use study of OCLC cataloging in the marine sciences (1989) 0.04
    0.035971332 = product of:
      0.14388533 = sum of:
        0.14388533 = weight(_text_:frequency in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14388533 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.5204964 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The original cataloging records of a marine science library were examined to determine frequency of use. The present study, patterned after an earlier study of municipal reference materials, shows an overall use rate of 45%. Patterns of subsequent use of original cataloging records suggest cataloging priorities, and changes to records indicate areas for attention to database quality control.
  3. Leung, S.W.: MARC CIP records and MARC LC records : an evaluative study of their discrepancies (1983) 0.03
    0.031474918 = product of:
      0.12589967 = sum of:
        0.12589967 = weight(_text_:frequency in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12589967 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.45543438 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last ten years, Cataloging in Publication (CIP) records have gained increasing acceptance and use in libraries, especially for cataloging purposes. Nevertheless, there is a general perception that the accuracy of CIP records can be further improved. Because improvement is only possible with more concrete information identifying specific problem areas, this study is designed to provide catalogers and cataloging managers more empirical data on the frequency and types of discrepancy between MARC CIP records and subsequent MARC LC records. This study differs from an earlier study which involved CIP records that appeared on the verso of the title page of publications. In addition, this study will make some observations regarding more effective use of the CIP records, primarily for cataloging purposes.
  4. Sanders, T.R.: Monographs of a regular frequency (1988) 0.03
    0.031474918 = product of:
      0.12589967 = sum of:
        0.12589967 = weight(_text_:frequency in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12589967 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27643865 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.45543438 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.888745 = idf(docFreq=332, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Saye, J.D.: ¬The cataloging experience in library and information science education : an educator's perspective (1987) 0.03
    0.027946608 = product of:
      0.11178643 = sum of:
        0.11178643 = weight(_text_:term in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11178643 = score(doc=387,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.510347 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents one approach to the teaching of both the basic and advanced courses in cataloging. In addressing the basic course, short-term and long-term objectives of the course are identified for four categories of students-Cataloging Specialists, General/Special Librarians, Non-Cataloging Specialists and Non-Library Information Specialists. The philosophy underlying this mode of instruction places emphasis upon group interaction and making the course enjoyable for the student, thus increasing interest while imparting more information and better preparing the four groups of students for work in organizing information. Stress is placed upon student participation and the use of realistic situations to instruct and evaluate student performance.
  6. Kranz, J.: Microcomputer software cataloging : the need for consistency (1988) 0.01
    0.013833362 = product of:
      0.055333447 = sum of:
        0.055333447 = product of:
          0.11066689 = sum of:
            0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11066689 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records for microcomputer software in the OCLC Online Union Catalog are evaluated primarily for the purpose of focusing catalogers' attention on selected record areas in need of more consistent treatment. The degree of cataloging inconsistency evident in these records is examined with respect to the application of rules and prescriptions embodied in AACR2 Chapter 9, the ALA Guidelines for cataloging microcomputer software, and the application of Library of Congress subject cataloging practice to these materials. A secondary purpose of this quantitative/qualitative study is to provide a general assessment of the overall composition of microcomputer software cataloging during this transition period between the use of available but disparate sources of descriptive cataloging guidance and their eventual consolidation in the future edition of AACR2.
  7. Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 19:12:22
  8. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
  9. Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985) 0.01
    0.006360204 = product of:
      0.025440816 = sum of:
        0.025440816 = product of:
          0.05088163 = sum of:
            0.05088163 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05088163 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:11
  10. Kovacic, E.S.: Learning to catalog : a practitioner's perspective (1987) 0.00
    0.0023542228 = product of:
      0.009416891 = sum of:
        0.009416891 = product of:
          0.037667565 = sum of:
            0.037667565 = weight(_text_:based in 904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037667565 = score(doc=904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=904)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Based on the author's experiences in cataloging, first as a paraprofessional, then as a professional, cataloging various types of materials and cataloging in very different library settings, she identifies several variables which enter into the cataloging process and describes how learning is achieved.
  11. Reeb, R.: ¬A quantitative method for evaluating the quality of cataloging (1984) 0.00
    0.0023542228 = product of:
      0.009416891 = sum of:
        0.009416891 = product of:
          0.037667565 = sum of:
            0.037667565 = weight(_text_:based in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037667565 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As a quality control measure particularly within the context of a union database like OCLC, cataloging revision can eliminate many errors which might otherwise be input. Based on this revision process, a sratistical method for evaluating the quality of a cataloger's work was developed. The rationale, method of scoring, and establishment of a standard are discussed.
  12. Chan, L.M.: Instructional materials used in teaching cataloging and classification (1987) 0.00
    0.0023542228 = product of:
      0.009416891 = sum of:
        0.009416891 = product of:
          0.037667565 = sum of:
            0.037667565 = weight(_text_:based in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037667565 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    An informal survey was conducted for the purpose of identifying instructional materials used in teaching cataloging and classification in library and information science programs in the United States and Canada. Based on responses from instructors in these areas, three groups of instructional materials were identified: cataloging and classification tools, textbooks, and background and supplementary reading materials.
  13. Lambrecht, J.H.: ¬A case for pre-order searching in the catalog department (1988) 0.00
    0.002059945 = product of:
      0.00823978 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Searching and record creation in a total and integrated library system could be accomplished in a number of departments. Local organizational history will inevitably have an impact upon the placement of responsibility for these functions, but should not be the sole criterion. Several factors argue strongly for searching and record creation within the catalog department. Among these are the expertise of the catalog department in creating and maintaining bibliographic records, the increasingly similar methods of pre-order and pre-catalog searching, and the theories upon which total and integrated systems such as NOTIS are based.
  14. Takawashi, T.; Shihota, T.; Oshiro, Z.: ¬The no-main-entry principle : the historical background of the Nippon Cataloging Rules (1989) 0.00
    0.002059945 = product of:
      0.00823978 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    When a unit card has become easy to reproduce, and each entry has an equal value for users in a multiple-entry catalog, the main-entry principle is no longer useful. The historical development of the no-main-entry principle in Japan is examined. It is generally considered that a title entry is the Oriental tradition. However, Japanese catalogers had used codes based upon the main entry principle under the influence of both AACR and the Paris Principles until 1977, when a new code of Nippon Cataloging Rules (NCR) was compiled. The "Description Unit-Card System of NCR1977, which adopted the no-main-entry principle, seems to be the one which is needed in the age of the computer catalog.
  15. Kranz, J.: Enhanced access to pamphlets : the application of AACR2 first level of description (1985) 0.00
    0.0017656671 = product of:
      0.0070626684 = sum of:
        0.0070626684 = product of:
          0.028250674 = sum of:
            0.028250674 = weight(_text_:based in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028250674 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A broad and diverse compendium of underutilized information is available in pamphlet format in the academic library. Its enhanced use is impeded by the lack of an effective means of catalog access. The traditional library practice of accessing pamphlets by a single subject heading assignment/arrangement greatly limits accessibility. The alternative of full cataloging regularly accorded books is generally provided only for selected pamphlets for reasons of cost. It is suggested that the provision of AACR2 first level of description may be a desirable and practical compromise between single subject assignment and full cataloging. The availability and ease of access to the information required for inclusion in cataloging of this type is examined based on a survey of pamphlets cataloged for the collections of the University Libraries at California State University, Northridge.