-
Lahiri, A.K.: Cataloging and a bibliographic republic (1985)
0.04
0.040309202 = product of:
0.1881096 = sum of:
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
0.08044326 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08044326 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
0.053833168 = weight(_text_:classification in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053833168 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.4, S.67-77
-
Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Pt.3: Subject description of machine-readable data files (1982)
0.04
0.035382897 = product of:
0.16512018 = sum of:
0.05092278 = weight(_text_:subject in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05092278 = score(doc=3921,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.057098698 = weight(_text_:classification in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057098698 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 2(1982) nos.3/4, S.45-58
-
Kranz, J.: Microcomputer software cataloging : the need for consistency (1988)
0.03
0.032000832 = product of:
0.11200291 = sum of:
0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029704956 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic records for microcomputer software in the OCLC Online Union Catalog are evaluated primarily for the purpose of focusing catalogers' attention on selected record areas in need of more consistent treatment. The degree of cataloging inconsistency evident in these records is examined with respect to the application of rules and prescriptions embodied in AACR2 Chapter 9, the ALA Guidelines for cataloging microcomputer software, and the application of Library of Congress subject cataloging practice to these materials. A secondary purpose of this quantitative/qualitative study is to provide a general assessment of the overall composition of microcomputer software cataloging during this transition period between the use of available but disparate sources of descriptive cataloging guidance and their eventual consolidation in the future edition of AACR2.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.83-96
-
Heynen, J.: ¬The ARL Microform Project for the bibliographic control of microforms : report on a survey of microform sets in U.S. and Canadian libraries (1984)
0.03
0.0302319 = product of:
0.1410822 = sum of:
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.060332447 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060332447 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.04037488 = weight(_text_:classification in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04037488 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1984) no.4, S.31-49
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985)
0.03
0.028566685 = product of:
0.1333112 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.08620717 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08620717 = score(doc=343,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.3, S.1-16
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.03
0.027581703 = product of:
0.09653596 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.014238005 = product of:
0.02847601 = sum of:
0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02847601 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.21-32
-
Wajenberg, A.S.: Cataloging instruction for public service librarians (1987)
0.03
0.027255066 = product of:
0.1271903 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=391,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
0.046620894 = weight(_text_:classification in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046620894 = score(doc=391,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This article describes a training program used in the Library of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to introduce 52 public service librarians to cataloging and classification. The program utilized specific cataloging samples, and emphasized the application of AACR 2 rules, Library of Congress rule interpretations, OCLC format documents, the Dewey Decimal Classification, and Library of Congress publications emanating from the Subject Cataloging Division. During the three year training period, the public service librarians have gradually assumed responsibility for all original cataloging of monographs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.4, S.109-119
-
Barnard, H.: Law book copy cataloging on OCLC potholes and pitfalls (1985)
0.03
0.025193252 = product of:
0.11756851 = sum of:
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
0.03364573 = weight(_text_:classification in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03364573 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This article examines twenty-seven bibliographic records on OCLC that require meaningful revision by a copy cataloger. All twenty-seven are legal publications. Recommendations and alternatives are discussed.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.4, S.79-84
-
Orbach, B.: Integrating concepts : corporate main entry and graphic materials (1988)
0.02
0.02075909 = product of:
0.09687576 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04977173 = score(doc=408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- As an illustration of the general concern about how bibliographic records for graphic materials can be integrated most effectively with records for works in other media, this article presents problems associated with applying existing AACR2 guidelines for choice of entry. Characteristics of original items and historical collections of pictures, the role of corporate bodies in creating such materials, and the degree to which AACR2 provisions for entry under the heading for a corporate body accommodate these features are examined. Recommendations regarding extending AACR2 Rule 21.1B2 and, more generally, regarding the need to examine the meaning and objectives of integrating bibliographic records for various media and actors affecting this process, are made.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 8(1988) no.2, S.71-89
-
Hurowitz, R.; Kalinsky, K.; McDonald, D.R.; Deventer, B.V.: Future catalogs and bibliographic links at Stanford University Libraries (1981)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) no.1, S.43-58
-
Lin, J.C.: Chinese names containing a non-Chinese given name (1988)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Chinese names have long been a problem for technical processing, cataloging, and bibliographic searching in the libraries. Comparing AACR1 and AACR2, each takes a different approach in dealing with Chinese names containing a non-Chinese given name. Catalogers have struggled with the problem, not always successfully, as reported in this article.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.69-81
-
Fenly, J.G.; Irvine, S.D.: ¬The Name Authority Co-op (NACO) project at the Library of Congress : present and future (1986)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Over the past nine years, the Name Authority Co-op Project (NACO) has grown to become an important source of both authority and bibliographic records in the LC database. With the implementation of the Linked Systems Project in late 1985, the enriched LC authorities database is being made available on a more timely basis to a wider library public. This article describes the origin and growth of NACO, its operations, and prospects for future cooperation.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1986) no.2, S.7-18
-
Mandel, C.A.; Rhee, S.F.: Shared cataloging : some remaining issues (1986)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- During the summer of 1985 the authors wrote "Shared Cataloging: Some Remaining Issues" as a background document for discussions of the Committee on Bibliographic Control of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). The paper identifies five factors which result in duplication of original cataloging and inhibit shared cataloging programs among research libraries. Several mechanisms whereby duplication of original cataloging efforts can be minimized in order to increase the efficacy of shared cataloging programs are described. The paper concludes by enumerating eight recommendations for further investigation.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1986) no.2, S.29-38
-
Hershey, J.: ¬The impact of the implementation of NOTIS on the technical services workflow at the Milton S. Eisenhower Library, Johns Hopkins University (1988)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Describes changes made in the workflow in Technical Services in the Eisenhower Library at Johns Hopkins University following the implementation of the NOTIS acquisitions system. A goal is to use the same bibliographic record for ordering and cataloging whenever possible. It is expected that the workflow of the Cataloging and Acquisitions Departments will be interdependent and evaluated on an ongoing basis.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.19-26
-
Niles, J.: Technical services reorganization for an online integrated environment (1988)
0.02
0.020154601 = product of:
0.0940548 = sum of:
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
0.04022163 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04022163 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Searching, verification and bibliographic record selection were the focal point for organizational and workflow decisions in planning the implementation of the NOTIS system in the Division of Technical Services of the University of Louisville Libraries. These activities were ultimately assigned to the Acquisitions Department. The various NOTIS requirements, local situations and developments, and administrative philosophies which led to that assignment are discussed. The new organizational structure is described.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.11-17
-
Harriman, R.B.: Coordination of cataloging practices in the United States newspaper program (1986)
0.02
0.019848065 = product of:
0.09262431 = sum of:
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.05224943 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05224943 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02018744 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The bibliographic component of the United States Newspaper Program comprises cooperative efforts to locate and catalog the more than 300,000 newspapers published in the U.S. and its territories since colonial times, and to enter bibliographic and holdings information about those titles into the CONSER data base. The attempt to gain bibliographic control over existing newspaper collections, as well as the attempt to gather and organize previously uncollected materials, has required procedural adaptations determined by a unique set of working conditions. The scale of the program has required specificity of goals and objectives, satisfying standards for inclusion of records in the national serials data base while maintaining reasonable economies. This paper outlines some of the mechanisms put in place to achieve that balance.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1986) no.4, S.15-29
-
Gertz, J.; Stout, L.J.: ¬The MARC Archival and Manuskripts Control (AMC) Format : a new direction in cataloging (1989)
0.02
0.018810362 = product of:
0.08778169 = sum of:
0.033948522 = weight(_text_:subject in 426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948522 = score(doc=426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=426)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=426)
0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026916584 = score(doc=426,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 426, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=426)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The development and use of the MARC Archival and Manuscript Control (AMC) format is described. The format's unique characteristics stem largely from the needs of the archivl community for both a uniform means of control of materials at the collection level and a powerful tool for exchanging information about archival holdings. Uniques aspects of AMC cataloguing are described, including differing approaches to access points, form of entry, title, physical description, notes, subject headings, and call numbers.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1989) no.4, S.5-25
-
McCrank, L.J.: ¬The bibliographic control of rare books : phased cataloging, descriptive standards, and costs (1984)
0.02
0.017983451 = product of:
0.08392277 = sum of:
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.05027704 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05027704 = score(doc=338,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.016822865 = weight(_text_:classification in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016822865 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Because rare book cataloging stresses the unique and characteristics of the species in special collections, it tends to be eclectic, chaotic even, in resisting standards and uniform description. Rare book librarians have therefore sought alternatives to AACR2 for bibliographic description at more detailed levels of control than this standard. Slowly a hierarchy of levels for the bibliographic control of books, manuscript and printed, is evolving which has a counterpart in archival control. As librarians choose appropriate levels of description for rare books and manuscripts, cost considerations must play their proper role. A survey of the major rare book and manuscript repositories in the U.S. and Canada provides comparative data for the cost of cataloging at levels higher than AACR2 and delineates other characteristics of RBSC operations for personnel, compensation, unit costs, backlogs, regional variance, standards in practice, accommodation of automation and networking, methods of providing intellectual access, and acquisition activities. This study discusses the concept of phased cataloging and collection management but suggests that current practices are not yet rationalized into an integrated system for the bibliographic control of rare books and archival control of manuscripts and records.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1984) no.1, S.27-51
-
Abrera, J.B.; Lin, J.C.: Parallel title problems of interpretation (1981)
0.02
0.017635275 = product of:
0.08229795 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This study examines the interrelationship of the rules on parallel title in AACR2. What emerges from the analysis are two principles that were utilized in the codification of the rules: (1) a principle of interrelationship (i.e. transcribing a data element in its relationship to other data elements); and (2) a principle of structured format (i.e. transcribing a data element in a prescribed order). A graphic representation of the possible combinations and positions of the data elements of descriptions in the title and statement of responsibility area (Area 1) shows that the present rules do not ensure consistency in bibliographic recording.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 1(1981) no.4, S.25-40
-
Piternick, A.B.: Traditional interpretations of "Authorship" and "Responsibility" in the description of scientific and technical documents (1985)
0.02
0.017635275 = product of:
0.08229795 = sum of:
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.035193928 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035193928 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.023552012 = weight(_text_:classification in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023552012 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03002521 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Traditional approaches to the concepts of "authorship" and "responsibility" of scientific and technical documents are examined in printed versions of selected abstracting services. The importance attributed to the work of the individual or the parent organization differs between discipline-oriented services developed for the most part by scientific and technical societies, and services announcing reports of government sponsored research developed by the U.S. Federal Government. These differences are linked to the contexts in which scientific and technical research are performed. Differences in approach which are apparent in printed sources may be obscured when databases are mounted for online searching and search vendors impose their own processing requirements on the bibliographic data.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.3, S.17-33
