-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.05
0.049133226 = product of:
0.09826645 = sum of:
0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020812286 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077454165 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Moncrieff, J.: Cataloguing of interactive multimedia : an ABN Standards Committee member's viewpoint (1995)
0.05
0.047912344 = product of:
0.19164938 = sum of:
0.19164938 = weight(_text_:standards in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19164938 = score(doc=4682,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.85291135 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the role of the Australian Bibliographic Network (ABN) Standards Committee. Discusses how the problem of cataloguing interactive multimedia came before the committee, the formulation of standards on ABN, and issues which must be taken into account in adopting a standard
-
Womble, K.: Retrospective conversion and cataloging of a major academic map collection : the University of Washington story (1999)
0.05
0.04722366 = product of:
0.09444732 = sum of:
0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 5336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01699316 = score(doc=5336,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5336, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5336)
0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 5336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077454165 = score(doc=5336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 5336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5336)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article is intended to provide information to the person faced with an uncataloged map collection. The article will discuss how various projects to catalog and classify a large existing map collection were completed at the University of Washington Libraries (UW). Project planning, standards, personnel issues and costs will be discussed. Information will be presented about outsourcing map cataloging, utilizing MARCIVE/U.S. Government Printing Office cataloging records and completing a shelflist conversion project. This article deals with the cataloging and classification of print maps and aerial photographs; atlases an electronic mapping products were not included in these projects.
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: Office of research project develops tools for describing and accessing Internet resources (1995)
0.04
0.04473507 = product of:
0.08947014 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077454165 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Over the past 5 years, librarians, humanities computing researchers and computer scientists have been working to establish standards for encoding and accessing local and networked electronic information resources, and these are now being put into practice by their corresponding user communities. The OCLC Cataloging Internet Resources project is investigating the relationship between 2 of these: the MARC bibliographic format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) header, developed by humanities computing researchers. Specifically, the project has designed a WWW based prototype, called Spectrum, that enables those without specialized knowledge of library cataloguing or markup to create records for describing and accessing Internet resources of various types. The system enables the generation of MARC records from TEI headers
-
Schwartz, R.: Uniform Resource Identifiers and the effort to bring 'bibliographic control' to the Web : an overview of current progress (1997)
0.04
0.04473507 = product of:
0.08947014 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 2577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=2577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2577)
0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 2577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077454165 = score(doc=2577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 2577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2577)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Uniform Resource Identifier aims to be an all encompassing concept and syntax to include and coordinate all forms of Uniform Resource standards that would be needed for addressing, naming and describing networked resources. The URL addresses the location of a networked resource. 2 other forms are under development: the Uniforms Resource Names (URN) which provides unique identifiers for networked resources and the Uniform Resource Characteristics (URC) which contains metadata on a networked resource. Details progress so far in their development
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 24(1997) no.1, Oct./Nov., S.12-14
-
Taylor, M.; Winstanley, B.: Bibliographic control of computer files : the feasibility of a union catalogue of computer files (1990)
0.04
0.04473507 = product of:
0.08947014 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077454165 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Describes a project based at the ESRC Data Archive, Esses University to examine standards for cataloguing computer files and the feasibility of creating a union catalogue of computer files. A pilot scheme was set up to enable the MARC record output of the ESRC Data Archive to be merged with the software records of the NISS (National Information on Software and Services) data base, which is available on the JANET network.
-
Wajenberg, A.S.: ¬The future of cataloging standards (1990)
0.04
0.044259522 = product of:
0.17703809 = sum of:
0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17703809 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Oddy, P.: Bibliographic standards for the New Age (1996)
0.04
0.044259522 = product of:
0.17703809 = sum of:
0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 4675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17703809 = score(doc=4675,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 4675, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4675)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the place of traditional bibliographic standards in the new electronic age. Questions the more extreme predictions of Internet enthusiasts concerning the future of printed materials and considers the culture change involved in developing print based and network based systems side by side. Discusses the nature of the standards required and concludes that existing bibliographic standards are not only suitable for dealing with the new situation but also have the benefit of applying relevant professional wisdom learned over many years to the new situation. Discusses AACR and indicates some possible amendments to the machine readable catalogue formats
-
Moloney, J.; Pearce, F.: Workshop 3 : Cataloguing standards - can we afford them? (1997)
0.04
0.044259522 = product of:
0.17703809 = sum of:
0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17703809 = score(doc=2837,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports by 2 delegates of Workshop 3 during the 12th Australian National Cataloguing Conference, Canberra, Australia, 11 Sep 1997, the focus of which was Cataloguing standards - can we afford them? The reports: argue that standards are indispensible but that a more workable set of principles is required to cope with user needs; cover issues related to costs and benefits of cataloguing standards; look at the emergence, impact and potentialities of metadata
-
Taniguchi, S.: ¬A system for analyzing cataloguing rules : a feasibility study (1996)
0.04
0.04341168 = product of:
0.08682336 = sum of:
0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008582841 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.07824052 = weight(_text_:standards in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07824052 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34819958 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The quality control of cataloging standards is as important as the quality control of bibliographic records. In order to aid the quality control of cataloging standards, a prototype system to analyze the ambiguity and complexity of cataloging rules was developed. Before developing the system, a standard rule unit was defined and a simple, function-like format was devised to indicate the syntactic structure of each unit rule. The AACR2 chapter 1 rules were then manually transformed into this function-like, unit role format. The systems reads the manually transformed unit rules and puts them into their basic forms based on their syntactic components. The system then applies rule-templates, which are skeletal schemata for specific types of cataloging rules, to the converted rules. As a result of this rule-template application, the internal structure of each unit rule is determined. The system is also used to explore inter-rule relationships. That is, the system determines whether two rules have an exclusive, parallel, complementary, or non-relationship. These relationships are based on the analysis of the structural parts described above in terms of the given rule-template. To assists in this process, the system applies external knowledge represented in the same fashion as the rule units themselves. Although the prototype system can handle only a restricted range of rules, the proposed approach is positively validated and shown to be useful. However, it is possibly impractical to build a complete rule-analyzing system of this type at this stage
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.5, S.338-356
-
Kuhagen, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records (1996)
0.04
0.043298192 = product of:
0.17319277 = sum of:
0.17319277 = weight(_text_:standards in 5109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17319277 = score(doc=5109,freq=10.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.7707726 = fieldWeight in 5109, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5109)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The USMARC Format for Authority Data is the standard for the representation and exchange of authority data in computerized records in the USA and name and series authority records are 2 categories of such authority data. Discusses the data content standards of authority work reflected in these name and series authority records in the US national authority file and examines how the standards have affected the content of the file and how the file's evolution from the LoC local authority file to a national resources authority file has affected the standards
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999)
0.04
0.038727082 = product of:
0.15490833 = sum of:
0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15490833 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997)
0.04
0.038344346 = product of:
0.07668869 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066389285 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
-
Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994)
0.04
0.038329873 = product of:
0.1533195 = sum of:
0.1533195 = weight(_text_:standards in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1533195 = score(doc=10,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.68232906 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
-
Cook, M.: ¬The international description standards : an interim report (1995)
0.03
0.03353864 = product of:
0.13415456 = sum of:
0.13415456 = weight(_text_:standards in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13415456 = score(doc=1551,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5970379 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the progress amde to date towards the designing and accepting of international standards for archival description. The International Council on Archives (ICA) set up the Ad Hoc Commission on Archival Description (ICA/DDS) in 1990 and its Statement of Principles regarding Archival Description (the Madrid Principles) was received by the ICA at the International Congress on Archives in Montreal in 1992. Discusses these principles and their implications. Describes the General International Standard Archival Description, ISAD(G) and considers access points and authorities. Indicates future developments in the international dascription standards
-
Leazer, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographic relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog : an examination of serials (1996)
0.03
0.03353864 = product of:
0.13415456 = sum of:
0.13415456 = weight(_text_:standards in 5579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13415456 = score(doc=5579,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5970379 = fieldWeight in 5579, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5579)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Evaluates current research into bibliographic relationships sparked off by B.B. Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (LRTS 35(1991) no.4, S.393-405) and R.P. Smiraglia's taxonomy of the derivative bibliographic relationship (PhD dissertation, Chicago Univ., Graduate Library School, 1992). These researches provide the context for a discussion of recent research and standards work. Reevaluates research on the sequential relationship drawn from work conducted on periodicals and the implications of that research is applied to cataloguing system design. Evaluates the conceptual designs proposed by researchers such as G.H. Leazer and M. Gorman's and uses them in a critique of the USMARC format for bibliographic description
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
-
Intner, S.S.: ¬The re-professionalization of cataloguing (1993)
0.03
0.033194643 = product of:
0.13277857 = sum of:
0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 7314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13277857 = score(doc=7314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 7314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7314)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Traces the de-professionalization of cataloguing in the 80s and show how it is being re-professiionalized in the 90s. Describes how cataloguing has change and their need for knowledge of standards, management, research and computing
-
Walsh, V.I.: Standards of archival description : a handbook. With contributions by M. Matters (1994)
0.03
0.033194643 = product of:
0.13277857 = sum of:
0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13277857 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
ISAAR(CPF): International Standard Archival Authority Record for corporate bodies, persons and families : draft prepared by the Ad Hoc Commission on Descriptive Standards, The Hague, Netherlands, 17-19 October 1994 (1994)
0.03
0.033194643 = product of:
0.13277857 = sum of:
0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 5022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13277857 = score(doc=5022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 5022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5022)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description : adopted by the Ad Hoc Commission on Descriptive Standards, Sweden, 21-23 January (1994)
0.03
0.033194643 = product of:
0.13277857 = sum of:
0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 5023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13277857 = score(doc=5023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 5023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5023)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
