-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.03
0.030116923 = product of:
0.09035077 = sum of:
0.09035077 = sum of:
0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023194931 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.06715584 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06715584 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002)
0.03
0.028477818 = product of:
0.08543345 = sum of:
0.08543345 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.07122952 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07122952 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:22:54
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.03
0.028477818 = product of:
0.08543345 = sum of:
0.08543345 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.07122952 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07122952 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000)
0.03
0.026619852 = product of:
0.079859555 = sum of:
0.079859555 = sum of:
0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501617 = score(doc=3948,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält u.a.: Grimaldi, T.: The object of cataloguing; Byrum, J.D., O.M.A. Madison: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records;
- Date
- 29. 8.2005 12:54:22
-
Boeuf, P. le: ¬The Impact of the FRBR model an the future revisions of the ISBDs : a challenge for the IFLA Section an Cataloging (2002)
0.03
0.02536581 = product of:
0.07609743 = sum of:
0.07609743 = sum of:
0.016739499 = weight(_text_:of in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016739499 = score(doc=3954,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:12:22
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.02
0.024756517 = product of:
0.07426955 = sum of:
0.07426955 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=43,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003)
0.02
0.023731515 = product of:
0.071194544 = sum of:
0.071194544 = sum of:
0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118366135 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.3-22
- Source
- Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.02
0.022141643 = product of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=562,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006)
0.02
0.022141643 = product of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=1085,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Dickinson, J.; Martin, C.K.; Mering, M.: Falling in and out of love : the impact of moving to a remote location on cataloging workflow (2003)
0.02
0.022135815 = product of:
0.06640744 = sum of:
0.06640744 = sum of:
0.024856888 = weight(_text_:of in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024856888 = score(doc=151,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- As academic libraries undergo renovation and building projects, various technical service operations are frequently moved out of the main building and housed in an off-site location. The aim of this research was to discover, by means of a questionnaire, what the impact of such a move is on the workflow of professional catalogers. The researchers concluded that a positive experience on the part of the catalogers depends upon detailed planning, thoughtful administrative support, and an element of luck. However, some problems are unavoidable in moving catalogers away from the main collection.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002)
0.02
0.021157425 = product of:
0.06347227 = sum of:
0.06347227 = sum of:
0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021921717 = score(doc=158,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001)
0.02
0.020615373 = product of:
0.06184612 = sum of:
0.06184612 = sum of:
0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020295564 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:09:22
-
ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001)
0.02
0.020615373 = product of:
0.06184612 = sum of:
0.06184612 = sum of:
0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020295564 = score(doc=746,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
- Date
- 22. 1.2007 20:46:57
-
Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005)
0.02
0.020292649 = product of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0133916 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.02
0.020292649 = product of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0133916 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003)
0.02
0.020292649 = product of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0133916 = score(doc=152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Morris, D.E.; Hobert, C.B.; Osmus, L.; Wool, G.: Cataloging staff costs revisited (2000)
0.02
0.020292649 = product of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0133916 = score(doc=171,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Staff costs for cataloging have declined at Iowa State University Library. This is demonstrated by data from a longitudinal time and cost study begun in 1987. We discuss the national developments, technological advancements, and reengineering efforts that have supported greater cataloging effectiveness and quality. We use the ISU findings as an example of a nationwide phenomenon resulting from the remarkable ability of catalogers to share work through national bibliographic utilities.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kellsey, C.: Cooperative cataloging, vendor records, and European language monographs (2002)
0.02
0.020072233 = product of:
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460194 = score(doc=160,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The appearance in OCLC and RLIN of minimal level catalog records from European book vendors for European language monographs and their effect on cataloging department workflows and cooperative cataloging efforts have been matters of concern expressed recently at ALA meetings and in the library literature. A study of 8,778 catalog records was undertaken to discover how many current European language monographs were being cataloged by the Library of Congress, by member libraries, and by vendors. It was found that vendor records accounted for 16. 7% of Spanish books, 18% of French books, 33.6% of German books, and 52.5% of those in Italian. The number of libraries enhancing vendor records in OCLC was found to be only approximately one-third the number of libraries contributing original records for European language books. Ongoing increases in European book publishing and the increasing globalization of cataloging databases mean that the results of this study have implications not only for local cataloging practice but for cooperative cataloging as a whole.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006)
0.02
0.020072233 = product of:
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460194 = score(doc=1050,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009)
0.02
0.020072233 = product of:
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460194 = score(doc=2766,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:20:24
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
