-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.12
0.115750425 = product of:
0.23150085 = sum of:
0.015563398 = weight(_text_:information in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015563398 = score(doc=4199,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.09176904 = weight(_text_:united in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09176904 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.12416841 = sum of:
0.088412896 = weight(_text_:states in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088412896 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.035755515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035755515 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
-
Joudrey, D.N.; McGinnis, R.: Graduate education for information organization, cataloging, and metadata (2014)
0.09
0.08839768 = product of:
0.17679536 = sum of:
0.018157298 = weight(_text_:information in 1980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018157298 = score(doc=1980,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1980, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1980)
0.10706388 = weight(_text_:united in 1980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10706388 = score(doc=1980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.433885 = fieldWeight in 1980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1980)
0.05157419 = product of:
0.10314838 = sum of:
0.10314838 = weight(_text_:states in 1980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10314838 = score(doc=1980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 1980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1980)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Discussions of cataloging and metadata education are popular in social media outlets, scholarly literature, conference meetings, and so on. This article, the third installment of a longitudinal study on the state of information organization (IO) education, analyzes the recent literature to identify new and continuing themes related to IO education. It provides an overview of the curricula of the 58 library and information science graduate programs in the United States and Canada accredited by the American Library Association (ALA). It examines the current conditions in 2012-2013 and compares them to data from earlier studies. It provides an overview of the types of IO courses available, program requirements, the number of schools offering IO courses, and the number of schools teaching those courses.
-
Kuhagen, J.: Training for the U.S. RDA test (2011)
0.06
0.06043355 = product of:
0.18130066 = sum of:
0.122358724 = weight(_text_:united in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.122358724 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
0.05894193 = product of:
0.11788386 = sum of:
0.11788386 = weight(_text_:states in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11788386 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article describes activities related to training for the 2010 test in the United States of the new descriptive cataloging standard RDA: Resource Description and Access. The main focus is on activities carried out at the Library of Congress on behalf of all the participants and specifically for LC's participants. Lessons learned from these activities for future training are included.
-
Park, J.-R.; Tosaka, Y.: Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections : criteria, semantics, and mechanisms (2010)
0.05
0.04532516 = product of:
0.13597548 = sum of:
0.09176904 = weight(_text_:united in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09176904 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
0.044206448 = product of:
0.088412896 = sum of:
0.088412896 = weight(_text_:states in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088412896 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article evaluates practices on metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections using an online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States. The study examines (1) the perceived importance of metadata quality, (2) metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and (3) mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process. The survey finds wide recognition of the essential role of metadata quality assurance. Accuracy and consistency are prioritized as the main criteria for metadata quality evaluation. Metadata semantics greatly affects consistent and accurate metadata application. Strong awareness of metadata quality correlates with the widespread adoption of various quality control mechanisms, such as staff training, manual review, metadata guidelines, and metadata generation tools. And yet, metadata guidelines are used less frequently as a quality assurance mechanism in digital collections involving multiple institutions.
-
Kim, J.; Diesner, J.: Distortive effects of initial-based name disambiguation on measurements of large-scale coauthorship networks (2016)
0.03
0.033880737 = product of:
0.10164221 = sum of:
0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007487943 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
0.09415426 = weight(_text_:networks in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09415426 = score(doc=2936,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.45257387 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Scholars have often relied on name initials to resolve name ambiguities in large-scale coauthorship network research. This approach bears the risk of incorrectly merging or splitting author identities. The use of initial-based disambiguation has been justified by the assumption that such errors would not affect research findings too much. This paper tests that assumption by analyzing coauthorship networks from five academic fields-biology, computer science, nanoscience, neuroscience, and physics-and an interdisciplinary journal, PNAS. Name instances in data sets of this study were disambiguated based on heuristics gained from previous algorithmic disambiguation solutions. We use disambiguated data as a proxy of ground-truth to test the performance of three types of initial-based disambiguation. Our results show that initial-based disambiguation can misrepresent statistical properties of coauthorship networks: It deflates the number of unique authors, number of components, average shortest paths, clustering coefficient, and assortativity, while it inflates average productivity, density, average coauthor number per author, and largest component size. Also, on average, more than half of top 10 productive or collaborative authors drop off the lists. Asian names were found to account for the majority of misidentification by initial-based disambiguation due to their common surname and given name initials.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1446-1461
-
Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018)
0.02
0.020615976 = product of:
0.061847925 = sum of:
0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007487943 = score(doc=5172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
0.054359984 = weight(_text_:networks in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054359984 = score(doc=5172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
-
Breeding, M.: Next-generation discovery : an overview of the European scene (2013)
0.02
0.020393122 = product of:
0.122358724 = sum of:
0.122358724 = weight(_text_:united in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.122358724 = score(doc=1478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In this chapter we will provide a brief overview of the features and general characteristics of this new genre of library software, focusing on the products that have been deployed or developed in the United Kingdom and other parts of Europe. Some of these projects include adoption of commercial products from international vendors such as Serials Solutions, EBSCO, Ex Libris, or OCLC and others involve locally-developed software or implementation of open source products.
-
Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011)
0.01
0.013004894 = product of:
0.039014682 = sum of:
0.018157298 = weight(_text_:information in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018157298 = score(doc=1899,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.020857384 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171477 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
- Date
- 25. 5.2015 18:36:22
-
Behrens, R.; Frodl, C.; Polak-Bennemann, R.: ¬The adoption of RDA in the German-Speaking countries (2014)
0.01
0.012683997 = product of:
0.07610398 = sum of:
0.07610398 = weight(_text_:networks in 1989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07610398 = score(doc=1989,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.36581108 = fieldWeight in 1989, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1989)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The discussion on the internationalization of German library standards has a long tradition, and revived around the millennium change with the recognition that the standards used so far were no longer suitable for the current needs. Therefore, the Committee for Library Standards, a consortium consisting mainly of German regional library networks and large academic libraries, with Austrian and Swiss representatives, agreed on the changeover. The article will describe all relevant aspects of the transition to Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the German-speaking library community.
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.01
0.011894252 = product of:
0.035682756 = sum of:
0.014825371 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014825371 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.020857384 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171477 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.01
0.010446835 = product of:
0.031340506 = sum of:
0.010483121 = weight(_text_:information in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010483121 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.020857384 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171477 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.01
0.010446835 = product of:
0.031340506 = sum of:
0.010483121 = weight(_text_:information in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010483121 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.020857384 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171477 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.01
0.010195073 = product of:
0.030585218 = sum of:
0.012707461 = weight(_text_:information in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012707461 = score(doc=2610,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.017877758 = product of:
0.035755515 = sum of:
0.035755515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035755515 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.01
0.00895443 = product of:
0.026863288 = sum of:
0.0089855315 = weight(_text_:information in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0089855315 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.017877758 = product of:
0.035755515 = sum of:
0.035755515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035755515 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.01
0.00895443 = product of:
0.026863288 = sum of:
0.0089855315 = weight(_text_:information in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0089855315 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.017877758 = product of:
0.035755515 = sum of:
0.035755515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035755515 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Normore, L.F.: "Here be dragons" : a wayfinding approach to teaching cataloguing (2012)
0.01
0.0074620256 = product of:
0.022386076 = sum of:
0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007487943 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.0148981325 = product of:
0.029796265 = sum of:
0.029796265 = weight(_text_:22 in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029796265 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Teaching cataloguing requires the instructor to make strategic decisions about how to approach the variety and complexity of the field and to provide an adequate theoretical foundation while preparing students for their entry into the world of practice. Accompanying these challenges are the tactical demands of providing this instruction in a distance education environment. Rather than focusing on ways to support learners in catalogue record production, instructors may use a problem solving and decision making approach to instruction. In this paper, a way to conceptualize a decision making approach that builds on a foundation provided by theories of information navigation is described. This approach, which is called "wayfinding", teaches by having students learn to find their way in the sets of rules that are commonly used. The method focuses on instruction about the structural features of rule sets, providing basic definitions of what each of the "places" in the rule sets contain (e.g., "formatting personal names" in Chapter 22 of AACR2R) and about ways to navigate those structures, enabling students to learn not only about common rules but also about less well known cataloguing practices ("dragons"). It provides both pragmatic and pedagogical benefits and helps develop links between cataloguing practices and their theoretical foundations.
-
Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016)
0.01
0.0074620256 = product of:
0.022386076 = sum of:
0.007487943 = weight(_text_:information in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007487943 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.0148981325 = product of:
0.029796265 = sum of:
0.029796265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029796265 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 21:22:27
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
-
Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012)
0.00
0.004499694 = product of:
0.026998162 = sum of:
0.026998162 = weight(_text_:information in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026998162 = score(doc=2086,freq=26.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- An overview of the field of information organization that examines resource description as both a product and process of the contemporary digital environment. This timely book employs the unifying mechanism of the semantic web and the resource description framework to integrate the various traditions and practices of information and knowledge organization. Uniquely, it covers both the domain-specific traditions and practices and the practices of the 'metadata movement' through a single lens - that of resource description in the broadest, semantic web sense. This approach more readily accommodates coverage of the new Resource Description and Access (RDA) standard, which aims to move library cataloguing into the centre of the semantic web. The work surrounding RDA looks set to revolutionise the field of information organization, and this book will bring both the standard and its model and concepts into focus.
- BK
- 06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
- Classification
- 06.99 (Information und Dokumentation: Sonstiges)
- Content
- Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
- LCSH
- Libraries / information technology
- RSWK
- Information / Beschreibung (BVB)
- Subject
- Information / Beschreibung (BVB)
Libraries / information technology
-
Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012)
0.00
0.0039728354 = product of:
0.023837011 = sum of:
0.023837011 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047674023 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:13:52
-
Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015)
0.00
0.0035298502 = product of:
0.0211791 = sum of:
0.0211791 = weight(_text_:information in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0211791 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
