-
Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003)
0.02
0.019076593 = product of:
0.07630637 = sum of:
0.07630637 = product of:
0.11445956 = sum of:
0.057488356 = weight(_text_:29 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057488356 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.056971207 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056971207 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:22:29
-
Tait, J.A.: Authors and titles : an analytical study of the author concept in codes of cataloguing rules in the English language, from that of the British Museum in 1841 to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 1967 (1969)
0.02
0.017199783 = product of:
0.06879913 = sum of:
0.06879913 = product of:
0.10319869 = sum of:
0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05720801 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 8.2008 19:29:39
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983)
0.02
0.01713083 = product of:
0.06852332 = sum of:
0.06852332 = product of:
0.10278498 = sum of:
0.05720801 = weight(_text_:language in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05720801 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045576964 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition, aim at universal applicability. Some problems brought forth through the translation process and the laws in the workability of rules in a nonEnglish working language are examined. This leads to acknowledge the failure of AACR2 to acquire an international adaptability. Enquiry into the needs of potential users is advised.
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 19:12:22
-
Adamovic, S.; Miskovic, V.; Milosavljevic, M.; Sarac, M.; Veinovic, M.: Automated language-independent authorship verification (for Indo-European languages) : facilitating adaptive visual exploration of scientific publications by citation links (2019)
0.02
0.016709033 = product of:
0.06683613 = sum of:
0.06683613 = product of:
0.10025419 = sum of:
0.07151002 = weight(_text_:language in 5327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151002 = score(doc=5327,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.4334667 = fieldWeight in 5327, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5327)
0.028744178 = weight(_text_:29 in 5327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028744178 = score(doc=5327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5327)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In this article we examine automated language-independent authorship verification using text examples in several representative Indo-European languages, in cases when the examined texts belong to an open set of authors, that is, the author is unknown. We showcase the set of developed language-dependent and language-independent features, the model of training examples, consisting of pairs of equal features for known and unknown texts, and the appropriate method of authorship verification. An authorship verification accuracy greater than 90% was accomplished via the application of stylometric methods on four different languages (English, Greek, Spanish, and Dutch, while the verification for Dutch is slightly lower). For the multilingual case, the highest authorship verification accuracy using basic machine-learning methods, over 90%, was achieved by the application of the kNN and SVM-SMO methods, using the feature selection method SVM-RFE. The improvement in authorship verification accuracy in multilingual cases, over 94%, was accomplished via ensemble learning methods, with the MultiboostAB method being a bit more accurate, but Random Forest is generally more appropriate
- Date
- 7. 7.2019 11:29:43
-
Leong, J.H.-t.: ¬The convergence of metadata and bibliographic control? : trends and patterns in addressing the current issues and challenges of providing subject access (2010)
0.02
0.01586188 = product of:
0.06344752 = sum of:
0.06344752 = product of:
0.09517127 = sum of:
0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06067826 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03449301 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Resource description and discovery have been facilitated generally in two approaches, namely bibliographic control and metadata, which now may converge in response to current issues and challenges of providing subject access. Four categories of major issues and challenges in the provision of subject access to digital and non-digital resources are: 1) the advancement of new knowledge; 2) the fall of controlled vocabulary and the rise of natural language; 3) digitizing and networking the traditional catalogue systems; and 4) electronic publishing and the Internet. The creation of new knowledge and the debate about the use of natural language and controlled vocabulary as subject headings becomes even more intense in the digital and online environment. The third and fourth categories are conceived after the emergence of networked environments and the rapid expansion of electronic resources. Recognizing the convergence of metadata schemas and bibliographic control calls for adapting to the new environment by developing tools that exploit the strengths of both.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.1, S.29-42
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.02
0.015810166 = product of:
0.06324066 = sum of:
0.06324066 = product of:
0.094860986 = sum of:
0.06067826 = weight(_text_:language in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06067826 = score(doc=4199,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
-
Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997)
0.02
0.015261276 = product of:
0.061045103 = sum of:
0.061045103 = product of:
0.09156765 = sum of:
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045576964 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 12:21:39
- Source
- DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.02
0.015261276 = product of:
0.061045103 = sum of:
0.061045103 = product of:
0.09156765 = sum of:
0.045990683 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045990683 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.045576964 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045576964 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:21:29
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
MacNeil, H.: ¬The implications of the UBC research results for archival descriptions in general and the Canadian Rules for Archival Description in particular (1996)
0.02
0.01504981 = product of:
0.06019924 = sum of:
0.06019924 = product of:
0.090298854 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses some of the findings of the current University of British Columbia (UBC) research project, 'The preservation of the integrity of electronic records', and the results of collaboration between the UBC research team and the US Dept. of Defense Records Management Task Force (DoDRMTF) in interpreting archival and diplomatic concepts through standard modelling techniques using IDEF (Integrated Definition Language). The research project's findings corroborate the assumptions of the Canadian Rule for Archival Description in relation to the timing, perspective, structure and purpose of archival description
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 12:13:49
-
Ho, J.: Applying form/genre headings to foreign films : a summary of AUTOCAT and OLAC-LIST discussions (2005)
0.02
0.01504981 = product of:
0.06019924 = sum of:
0.06019924 = product of:
0.090298854 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=5717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=5717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In several discussions on two electronic lists (AUTOCAT and OLAC-LIST) from 1993 to 2003, librarians expressed interest in using form/genre headings to provide access to foreign films as a separate category of material, as well as by language and country of production, but observed that existing standards do not accommodate these practices. Various options were discussed, including the adaptation of subject headings intended for topical use, geographical subdivision of existing form/genre headings, and the creation of local headings. This paper summarizes the discussions and describes the local policy at Texas A&M University Libraries.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:17:23
-
Diao, J.: "Fu hao," "fu hao," "fuHao," or "fu Hao"? : a cataloger's navigation of an ancient Chinese woman's name (2015)
0.02
0.01504981 = product of:
0.06019924 = sum of:
0.06019924 = product of:
0.090298854 = sum of:
0.05005701 = weight(_text_:language in 2009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05005701 = score(doc=2009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 2009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2009)
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 2009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=2009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2009)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Chinese language catalogers' work is not only challenged by the revolution in cataloging standards and principles, but also by ancient Chinese names that emerged in archaeological discoveries and Chinese classic texts, which create a significant impact on bibliographic description and retrieval in terms of consistency and accuracy. This article takes an example of one ancient Chinese lady's name that is inconsistently romanized and described in OCLC to explore the reasons that cause the name variations and to propose an appropriate authorized access point after consulting both Western and Eastern scholarly practices. This article investigates the evolving history of pre-Qin Chinese names that are not addressed or exemplified in the Library of Congress Romanization Table, and recommends a revision of that Table.
- Date
- 31. 5.2015 9:29:18
-
Baia, W.; Randall, K.M.; Leatham, C.: Creativity in serials cataloguing : heresy or necessity? (1998)
0.01
0.013353615 = product of:
0.05341446 = sum of:
0.05341446 = product of:
0.08012169 = sum of:
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7. 1.1999 19:22:13
- Footnote
- Part of an issue devoted to 'Experimentation and collaboration: creating series for a new millenium', part 2, Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc.'s 12th annual conference, 29 May - 1 June 1997, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.01
0.013353615 = product of:
0.05341446 = sum of:
0.05341446 = product of:
0.08012169 = sum of:
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 19:33:42
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990)
0.01
0.013353615 = product of:
0.05341446 = sum of:
0.05341446 = product of:
0.08012169 = sum of:
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:29:22
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.01
0.013353615 = product of:
0.05341446 = sum of:
0.05341446 = product of:
0.08012169 = sum of:
0.040241845 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040241845 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.039879844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039879844 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.01
0.012848122 = product of:
0.05139249 = sum of:
0.05139249 = product of:
0.07708873 = sum of:
0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906005 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.26008 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.01
0.012848122 = product of:
0.05139249 = sum of:
0.05139249 = product of:
0.07708873 = sum of:
0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906005 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.26008 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023)
0.01
0.012848122 = product of:
0.05139249 = sum of:
0.05139249 = product of:
0.07708873 = sum of:
0.042906005 = weight(_text_:language in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042906005 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16497234 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.26008 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
- Date
- 22. 3.2023 12:00:14
-
Pappas, E.: ¬An analysis of eight RLIN-members' authority controlled access points for purposes of speeding copy cataloging work flow (1996)
0.01
0.011445956 = product of:
0.045783825 = sum of:
0.045783825 = product of:
0.068675734 = sum of:
0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03449301 = score(doc=5530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=5530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-47
-
Bowman, J.H.: Changing cataloging rules in relation to changing patterns of publication (1996)
0.01
0.011445956 = product of:
0.045783825 = sum of:
0.045783825 = product of:
0.068675734 = sum of:
0.03449301 = weight(_text_:29 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03449301 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14791684 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.034182724 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034182724 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14725003 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042049456 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50
