Search (212 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985) 0.14
    0.13768461 = product of:
      0.20652692 = sum of:
        0.05981137 = product of:
          0.1794341 = sum of:
            0.1794341 = weight(_text_:objects in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1794341 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14671555 = weight(_text_:systematic in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671555 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
  2. Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999) 0.10
    0.09957343 = product of:
      0.14936015 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
        0.023603968 = product of:
          0.047207937 = sum of:
            0.047207937 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047207937 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000) 0.10
    0.09957343 = product of:
      0.14936015 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
        0.023603968 = product of:
          0.047207937 = sum of:
            0.047207937 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047207937 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Jeng, L.H.: ¬A converging vision of cataloging in the electronic world (1996) 0.06
    0.061810598 = product of:
      0.0927159 = sum of:
        0.05981137 = product of:
          0.1794341 = sum of:
            0.1794341 = weight(_text_:objects in 7686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1794341 = score(doc=7686,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 7686, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.032904528 = product of:
          0.065809056 = sum of:
            0.065809056 = weight(_text_:indexing in 7686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065809056 = score(doc=7686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 7686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional cataloguing practices have been geared to printed materials or other materials that have fixed forms. The advent of electronic library materials poses new challenges for cataloguing as electronic objects may exist in multiple and changing versions. Discusses current attempts to organize electronic information objects in a world that is messy, volatile and uncontrolled and traces library cataloguing from manual to electronic organization. Electronic text may be available as a standalone ASCII, PostScript or another file. The file can reside on a floppy disk or on a minicomputer or mainframe computer as a file with a URL address and directory path. Briefly reviews some Internet indexing projects and prototypes, presents a vision of what cataloguing could evolve into the electronic world and discusses what needs to be done to realise this vision
  5. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.06
    0.05823289 = product of:
      0.08734933 = sum of:
        0.05981137 = product of:
          0.1794341 = sum of:
            0.1794341 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1794341 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.027537964 = product of:
          0.05507593 = sum of:
            0.05507593 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05507593 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  6. Strunk, K.: Control of personal names (1991) 0.05
    0.048905186 = product of:
      0.14671555 = sum of:
        0.14671555 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671555 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This investigation deals with control of personal names occurring in Danish books catalogued according to the Danish version of AACR2. A systematic sample was taken from "The Danish national bibliography. Books. The five year list" and examined to determine how often documents with form problems in personal names occur, and, to reveal how personal names distribute on types of form problems. The results show that the most frequent problem is that names are not sufficient for identification, and that theoretically more interesting problems such as names not written in the Roman alphabet or several names used by the same author occur more seldom.
  7. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.05
    0.048905186 = product of:
      0.14671555 = sum of:
        0.14671555 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671555 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  8. Jeng, L.H.: ¬An expert system for determining title proper in descriptive cataloging : a conceptual model (1986) 0.05
    0.048905186 = product of:
      0.14671555 = sum of:
        0.14671555 = weight(_text_:systematic in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671555 = score(doc=375,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The human process of determining bibliographic data from title pages of monographs is complex, yet systematic. This paper investigates the intellectual process involved, in conceptual and logical levels, by proposing a model of the expert system for determining title proper as the first element of the first area in ISBD. It assumes that the title page of a monograph consists of more than one block of character or graphic representation. Each block has its physical and content characteristics and can be separated from other blocks by separators. Three categories of expert knowledge are identified, and the system model is discussed along with its individual system component. It applies the "list" concept for the system data structure and addresses the potentiality of this conceptual model.
  9. André, P.W.; Janakiev, E.; Case, M.M.; Randall, K.M.: Serials control in an online integrated system : can latest entry cataloging help? (1986) 0.05
    0.048905186 = product of:
      0.14671555 = sum of:
        0.14671555 = weight(_text_:systematic in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14671555 = score(doc=381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An experiment in latest entry cataloging of selected serial title changes is currently being conducted at Northwestern University Library. The integrated structure of Northwestern's automated system NOTIS and its applications to serials processing were primary factors leading to the investigation of latest entry cataloging as an alternative to the current standard of successive entry cataloging for serial title changes. A systematic investigation was conducted through most of 1985 and allowed project staff to identify and evaluate a number of concerns and problems. The study team is encouraged with the results, but will continue gathering cataloging statistics and will conduct user studies before adopting latest entry cataloging as a permanent option.
  10. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.05
    0.04655399 = product of:
      0.069830984 = sum of:
        0.042293023 = product of:
          0.12687907 = sum of:
            0.12687907 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12687907 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.027537964 = product of:
          0.05507593 = sum of:
            0.05507593 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05507593 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  11. Walker, K.; Kwasnik, B.: Providing access to collected works (2002) 0.04
    0.04297003 = product of:
      0.06445505 = sum of:
        0.036251165 = product of:
          0.10875349 = sum of:
            0.10875349 = weight(_text_:objects in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10875349 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.028203882 = product of:
          0.056407765 = sum of:
            0.056407765 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056407765 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    How are the boundaries of information objects to be defined in the networked electronic environment and what is the role of our retrieval systems in providing access where these boundaries are uncertain? The authors consider these questions in light of longstanding problems surrounding the definition of the "work" in the print environment. In particular, they examine the role of the index in providing access to the collected works of the individual writer. They review the discussion in the indexing literature of the "long index," and the close relationship between the functions of indexer and editor in collected works projects. And they treat the role of the index in constituting as a self-contained corpus the disparate types of text that make up a writer's lifetime output. Finally, by way of example, the authors turn to the extensive indexes to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic writings.
  12. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.04
    0.041918732 = product of:
      0.12575619 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  13. Ammannati, G.C.: ¬The Bibliografia Nazionale Italiana and control of access points (2004) 0.04
    0.041918732 = product of:
      0.12575619 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=5665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In its role as a national bibliographic agency, the Bibliografia Nazionale Italiana (BNI) has never been in a position to fulfill what should be one of its main functions: authority control. Despite the creation of various committees, studies, and projects, and the close relationship between the BNI and the Servizio Bibliotecario Nazionale (SBN), no plan of action with regard to authority control, whether shared or developed in consultation, has been produced to date. Recently, a significant result was achieved: the specification of the new BNI/UNIMARC database, structured according to authority control principles. And in collaboration with the Region of Tuscany, a project for control of access points destined for the users and librarians of that region is in progress, providing the opportunity to initiate the systematic control of BNI access points. The BNI is now in a position to begin to realize the first objective recommended by the IFLA Working Group on an International Authority System more than twenty years ago: to establish authority headings, including cross-references, for its bibliographic records.
  14. Choi, K.; Yusof, H.M.; Ibrahim, F.: RDA: National Library Board Singapore's learning journey (2014) 0.04
    0.041918732 = product of:
      0.12575619 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=1984,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In May 2012, National Library Board (NLB) Singapore decided to implement Resource Description and Access (RDA) for NLB and targeted its implementation on April 1, 2013. This article presents NLB's RDA journey as it documents and highlights the library's experience in executing RDA in a seamless, systematic approach. The authors share how NLB formulated its implementation strategy and action plan, the adoption and development of the plan, as well as the discussions and milestone decisions made. Based on the Library of Congress' training materials, NLB customized and packaged its training programs to suit the specific needs of NLB staff. NLB also made local decisions needed before cataloging in RDA, communicated its decisions to a user group, and obtained feedback from them. This article also describes the challenges faced, and how NLB overcame them. As RDA is still a work in progress, NLB recognizes that more effort is required to take RDA to the next level. Finally, the authors share NLB's future plans for RDA.
  15. Theise, A.: Possibilities for standardized cataloging of prints : the collection of engravings at the Hamburg State and University Library (2016) 0.04
    0.041918732 = product of:
      0.12575619 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 5125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=5125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 5125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5125)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    German museums keep over 5,000,000 graphic prints in their graphic collections from the late Middle Ages to the present. This figure comes from a survey of 2006: "Graphische Sammlungen," www.graphischesammlungen.de/index.php?view=detail&id=23 (accessed February 4, 2016). Due to the poor availability of data it is hard to ascertain how many additional sheets "slumber" in libraries and archives. Libraries often keep conglomerations of graphic sheets, which have grown over the centuries by bequests and donations, without being accessible in a systematic way for the users of a collection. Such a collection is the small but excellent collection of engravings at the Hamburg State and University Library. This article will propose how Resource Description and Access (RDA) can be adapted in such a way that our special graphic material can be made accessible and be used and how a standardized set of elements can be developed.
  16. Fernanda de Jesus, A.; Ferreira de Castro, F.: Proposal for the publication of linked open bibliographic data (2024) 0.04
    0.041918732 = product of:
      0.12575619 = sum of:
        0.12575619 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12575619 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33191046 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05807226 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Linked Open Data (LOD) are a set of principles for publishing structured, connected data available for reuse under an open license. The objective of this paper is to analyze the publishing of bibliographic data such as LOD, having as a product the elaboration of theoretical-methodological recommendations for the publication of these data, in an approach based on the ten best practices for publishing LOD, from the World Wide Web Consortium. The starting point was the conduction of a Systematic Review of Literature, where initiatives to publish bibliographic data such as LOD were identified. An empirical study of these institutions was also conducted. As a result, theoretical-methodological recommendations were obtained for the process of publishing bibliographic data such as LOD.
  17. Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.04
    0.041594923 = product of:
      0.06239238 = sum of:
        0.042722404 = product of:
          0.12816721 = sum of:
            0.12816721 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12816721 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3086582 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.019669976 = product of:
          0.039339952 = sum of:
            0.039339952 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039339952 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Oder, N.: Cataloging the net : can we do it? (1998) 0.02
    0.021936353 = product of:
      0.065809056 = sum of:
        0.065809056 = product of:
          0.13161811 = sum of:
            0.13161811 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13161811 = score(doc=4563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22229293 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 4563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The author discusses attempts and stadards for organizing and indexing the Internet
  19. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.02
    0.020981308 = product of:
      0.06294392 = sum of:
        0.06294392 = product of:
          0.12588784 = sum of:
            0.12588784 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12588784 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  20. Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992) 0.02
    0.020981308 = product of:
      0.06294392 = sum of:
        0.06294392 = product of:
          0.12588784 = sum of:
            0.12588784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12588784 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20335917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05807226 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 198
  • b 15
  • m 11
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • More… Less…