Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.043751784 = sum of:
  0.020068768 = product of:
    0.08027507 = sum of:
      0.08027507 = weight(_text_:authors in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08027507 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22768046 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049942914 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.023683013 = product of:
    0.047366027 = sum of:
      0.047366027 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047366027 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17489158 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049942914 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study analyzes Spanish research on Knowledge Organization from 2002 to 2010. The first stage involved extraction of records from national and international databases that were interrogated. After getting the pertinent records, they we re normalized and processed according to the usual bibliometric procedure. The results point to a mature specialty follow ing the path of the past decade. There is a remarkable increase of male vs. female authors per publication, although the gender gap is not big. It is also evident that ther e is a remarkable internationalization in publication and that the content map of the specialty is more varied than in the previous decade.

Date

22. 2.2013 12:10:07

0.025852803 = product of:
  0.051705606 = sum of:
    0.051705606 = product of:
      0.10341121 = sum of:
        0.10341121 = weight(_text_:j.d in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10341121 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3418521 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.8448567 = idf(docFreq=127, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049942914 = queryNorm
            0.30250278 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.8448567 = idf(docFreq=127, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.

0.007167417 = product of:
  0.014334834 = sum of:
    0.014334834 = product of:
      0.057339337 = sum of:
        0.057339337 = weight(_text_:authors in 5559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057339337 = score(doc=5559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22768046 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049942914 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5559)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Scrutinizing the ways in which early printed reference works were designed is a way of bringing typography and book history into the domain of library and information science. The core subject of this discipline is the concept of user-oriented organization of knowledge; it has a close connection to information-seeking behavior and retrieval. By studying the typographic arrangement of knowledge in early printed reference works, one can approach the history of the storage, organization, and retrieval of scientific information. The article discusses the typographic "architecture" of the dictionaries published by the Antwerp printer Christophe Plantin and, more specifically, the three dictionaries of the Dutch language compiled by Plantin's learned proofreader Cornelis Kiliaan (ca. 1530-1607). Kiliaan was one of the first authors to introduce etymology and comparative linguistics into his dictionaries. By analyzing the typographic macrostructures and microstructures of his works, it is possible to discover the lines along which they developed-in the words of Paul Valéry-into machines à savoir. The article also compares Plantin's dictionaries with the international benchmark for lexicographic publishing in the Renaissance world, viz. the translation dictionaries compiled and printed by the Parisian publisher Robert Estienne.

0.0067665754 = product of:
  0.013533151 = sum of:
    0.013533151 = product of:
      0.027066302 = sum of:
        0.027066302 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027066302 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17489158 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049942914 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.