Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Kautto, V.: Classing and indexing : a comparative time study (1992) 0.01
```
0.013719295 = product of:
  0.068596475 = sum of:
    0.068596475 = weight(_text_:o in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068596475 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20624171 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.33260235 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

A total of 16 classifiers made a subject analysis of a set of books such that some of the books were first classified by the UDC anf then indexed with terms from the General Finnish Subject Headings while another set were processed in the opposite order. Finally books on the same subject were either classifies or indexed. The total number of books processed was 581. A comparison was made of the time required for processing in different situations and of the number of classes or subject headings used. The time figures were compared with corresponding data from the British Library (1972) and the Library of Congress (1990 and 1991). The author finds that the contents analysis requires one third, classification one third and indexing obe third of the time, if the document is both classified and indexed. There was a plausible correlation (o.51) between the length of experience in classification and the decrease in the time required for classing. The average number of UDC numbers was 4,3 and the average number of terms from the list of subject headings was 4,0

Cleverdon, C.W.: ¬The Cranfield tests on index language devices (1967) 0.01

0.01168689 = product of:
  0.058434453 = sum of:
    0.058434453 = weight(_text_:u in 1957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058434453 = score(doc=1957,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1957, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1957)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.47-58.

Evedove, P.R. Dal; Evedove Tartarotti, R.C. Dal; Lopes Fujita, M.S.: Verbal protocols in Brazilian information science : a perspective from indexing studies (2018) 0.01
```
0.0077912607 = product of:
  0.038956303 = sum of:
    0.038956303 = weight(_text_:u in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038956303 = score(doc=4783,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

Krovetz, R.; Croft, W.B.: Lexical ambiguity and information retrieval (1992) 0.01

0.0069672973 = product of:
  0.034836486 = sum of:
    0.034836486 = weight(_text_:r in 4028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034836486 = score(doc=4028,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 4028, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4028)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Biagetti, M.T.: Indexing and scientific research needs (2006) 0.01

0.006817353 = product of:
  0.034086764 = sum of:
    0.034086764 = weight(_text_:u in 235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034086764 = score(doc=235,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 235, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=235)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996) 0.01

0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Burgin, R.: ¬The effect of indexing exhaustivity on retrieval performance (1991) 0.01

0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003) 0.01

0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Losee, R.: ¬A performance model of the length and number of subject headings and index phrases (2004) 0.01

0.005971969 = product of:
  0.029859845 = sum of:
    0.029859845 = weight(_text_:r in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029859845 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Rodriguez Bravo, B.: ¬The visibility of women in indexing languages (2006) 0.01

0.005843445 = product of:
  0.029217226 = sum of:
    0.029217226 = weight(_text_:u in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029217226 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13460001 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch

Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00

0.00445546 = product of:
  0.0222773 = sum of:
    0.0222773 = product of:
      0.0445546 = sum of:
        0.0445546 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0445546 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22

Shoham, S.; Kedar, R.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of keywords (2001) 0.00

0.0039813123 = product of:
  0.019906562 = sum of:
    0.019906562 = weight(_text_:r in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019906562 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13607219 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041106213 = queryNorm
        0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00

0.0038985272 = product of:
  0.019492636 = sum of:
    0.019492636 = product of:
      0.03898527 = sum of:
        0.03898527 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03898527 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26

Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.00

0.0038985272 = product of:
  0.019492636 = sum of:
    0.019492636 = product of:
      0.03898527 = sum of:
        0.03898527 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03898527 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 4. 1.2007 10:22:26

Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00

0.0033415947 = product of:
  0.016707974 = sum of:
    0.016707974 = product of:
      0.033415947 = sum of:
        0.033415947 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033415947 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 18. 6.2005 13:16:22

Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.00

0.0033415947 = product of:
  0.016707974 = sum of:
    0.016707974 = product of:
      0.033415947 = sum of:
        0.033415947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033415947 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 9. 2.1997 18:44:22

Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.00

0.0027846624 = product of:
  0.013923312 = sum of:
    0.013923312 = product of:
      0.027846623 = sum of:
        0.027846623 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027846623 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.00
```
0.0027846624 = product of:
  0.013923312 = sum of:
    0.013923312 = product of:
      0.027846623 = sum of:
        0.027846623 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027846623 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14394696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041106213 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.

Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes