Search (78 results, page 4 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Cole, C.; Mandelblatt, B.: Using Kintsch's discourse comprehension theory to model the user's coding of an informative message from an enabling information retrieval system (2000) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 5161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=5161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Breitenstein, M.: Classification, culture studies, and the experience of the individual : three methods for knowledge discovery (2000) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 95) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=95,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 95, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=95)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  3. Thornley, C.: Dilemmas in information science (IS) and information retrieval (IR) : recurring challenges or new solutions? (2009) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=2964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Cole, C.: ¬A theory of information need for information retrieval that connects information to knowledge (2011) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=4474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Wu, L.-L.; Huang, M.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.: Citation patterns of the pre-web and web-prevalent environments : the moderating effects of domain knowledge (2012) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Almeida, C.C. de; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Reis, D.M. dos: Peircean semiotics and subject indexing : contributions of speculative grammar and pure logic (2013) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The semiotics of C. S. Peirce presents fundamental concepts to discover aspects of the indexing process, including representation and classes of signs. However, we still know little of its theoretical potential for subject indexing. We believe that the main difficulty in the proposals to understand the process of subject indexing based on Peircean semiotics stems from an incomplete interpretation of his semiotic system. This paper attempts to describe the contributions of Peircean semiotics to subject indexing. First, we analyze some of the concepts of the branches of semiotics, after which, we discuss strategies for conceptual approximation. Secondly, and aiming to raise the level of interlocution between the areas, we intend to argue that subject indexing is an inferential process, as explained by the second branch of semiotics. Thus, we seek to go beyond the level of speculative grammar, the first branch of semiotics, to forge a closer link with pure or critical logic, the second branch. We conclude that the indexer's work does not produce a mere reflection of what already exists in documents, but involves an instigating action to discover, through the inferential matrix, the meaning of a text in order to find the subject and the most a ppropriate subject added entry to the information system.
  7. Gnoli, C.; Ridi, C.R.: Unified Theory of Information, hypertextuality and levels of reality : without, within, and withal knowledge management (2014) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 1796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=1796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1796)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Dinneen, J.D.; Brauner, C.: Practical and philosophical considerations for defining information as well-formed, meaningful data in the information sciences (2015) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 5528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=5528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5528)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Graminius, C.: Fast-food information, information quality and information gap : a temporal exploration of the notion of information in science communication on climate change (2022) 0.01 
    0.0061501605 = product of:
  0.012300321 = sum of:
    0.012300321 = product of:
      0.024600642 = sum of:
        0.024600642 = weight(_text_:c in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024600642 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.01 
    0.0050708186 = product of:
  0.010141637 = sum of:
    0.010141637 = product of:
      0.020283274 = sum of:
        0.020283274 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020283274 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  11. Benkowsky, J.; Bühring, B.; Georgy, U.; Linde, F.: Information pricing : the development of a product- and pricing concept for the research centre of the Public Library Cologne (2005) 0.01 
    0.0050708186 = product of:
  0.010141637 = sum of:
    0.010141637 = product of:
      0.020283274 = sum of:
        0.020283274 = weight(_text_:22 in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020283274 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2009 9:24:59
  12. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.01 
    0.0050708186 = product of:
  0.010141637 = sum of:
    0.010141637 = product of:
      0.020283274 = sum of:
        0.020283274 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020283274 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.01 
    0.0050708186 = product of:
  0.010141637 = sum of:
    0.010141637 = product of:
      0.020283274 = sum of:
        0.020283274 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020283274 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
  14. Cardoso, A.M.P.; Bemfica, J.C.; Borges, M.N.: Information and organizational knowledge faced with contemporary knowledge theories : unveiling the strength of the myth (2000) 0.00 
    0.0049201283 = product of:
  0.009840257 = sum of:
    0.009840257 = product of:
      0.019680513 = sum of:
        0.019680513 = weight(_text_:c in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019680513 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  15. Bates, M.J.: Concepts for the study of information embodiment (2018) 0.00 
    0.0049201283 = product of:
  0.009840257 = sum of:
    0.009840257 = product of:
      0.019680513 = sum of:
        0.019680513 = weight(_text_:c in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019680513 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0002. Vgl. auch den Kommentar in: Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied): that is not the question. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.114-117. (Opinion paper) Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.
  16. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The controversy over the concept of information : a rejoinder to Professor Bates (2009) 0.00 
    0.0031692616 = product of:
  0.0063385232 = sum of:
    0.0063385232 = product of:
      0.0126770465 = sum of:
        0.0126770465 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0126770465 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:13:27
  17. Crane, G.; Jones, A.: Text, information, knowledge and the evolving record of humanity (2006) 0.00 
    0.0030750802 = product of:
  0.0061501605 = sum of:
    0.0061501605 = product of:
      0.012300321 = sum of:
        0.012300321 = weight(_text_:c in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012300321 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Consider a sentence such as "the current price of tea in China is 35 cents per pound." In a library with millions of books we might find many statements of the above form that we could capture today with relatively simple rules: rather than pursuing every variation of a statement, programs can wait, like predators at a water hole, for their informational prey to reappear in a standard linguistic pattern. We can make inferences from sentences such as "NAME1 born at NAME2 in DATE" that NAME more likely than not represents a person and NAME a place and then convert the statement into a proposition about a person born at a given place and time. The changing price of tea in China, pedestrian birth and death dates, or other basic statements may not be truth and beauty in the Phaedrus, but a digital library that could plot the prices of various commodities in different markets over time, plot the various lifetimes of individuals, or extract and classify many events would be very useful. Services such as the Syllabus Finder1 and H-Bot2 (which Dan Cohen describes elsewhere in this issue of D-Lib) represent examples of information extraction already in use. H-Bot, in particular, builds on our evolving ability to extract information from very large corpora such as the billions of web pages available through the Google API. Aside from identifying higher order statements, however, users also want to search and browse named entities: they want to read about "C. P. E. Bach" rather than his father "Johann Sebastian" or about "Cambridge, Maryland", without hearing about "Cambridge, Massachusetts", Cambridge in the UK or any of the other Cambridges scattered around the world. Named entity identification is a well-established area with an ongoing literature. The Natural Language Processing Research Group at the University of Sheffield has developed its open source Generalized Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE) for years, while IBM's Unstructured Information Analysis and Search (UIMA) is "available as open source software to provide a common foundation for industry and academia." Powerful tools are thus freely available and more demanding users can draw upon published literature to develop their own systems. Major search engines such as Google and Yahoo also integrate increasingly sophisticated tools to categorize and identify places. The software resources are rich and expanding. The reference works on which these systems depend, however, are ill-suited for historical analysis. First, simple gazetteers and similar authority lists quickly grow too big for useful information extraction. They provide us with potential entities against which to match textual references, but existing electronic reference works assume that human readers can use their knowledge of geography and of the immediate context to pick the right Boston from the Bostons in the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN), but, with the crucial exception of geographic location, the TGN records do not provide any machine readable clues: we cannot tell which Bostons are large or small. If we are analyzing a document published in 1818, we cannot filter out those places that did not yet exist or that had different names: "Jefferson Davis" is not the name of a parish in Louisiana (tgn,2000880) or a county in Mississippi (tgn,2001118) until after the Civil War.
  18. Hartel, J.: ¬The case against Information and the Body in Library and Information Science (2018) 0.00 
    0.0030750802 = product of:
  0.0061501605 = sum of:
    0.0061501605 = product of:
      0.012300321 = sum of:
        0.012300321 = weight(_text_:c in 5523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012300321 = score(doc=5523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.09527725 = fieldWeight in 5523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0018. Vgl. auch den Kommentar in: Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied): that is not the question. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.114-117. (Opinion paper) Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.

Authors

Years

Themes