Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.02
    0.017511327 = product of:
      0.035022654 = sum of:
        0.035022654 = product of:
          0.07004531 = sum of:
            0.07004531 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07004531 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
  2. Potnis, D.; Tahamtan, I.: Hashtags for gatekeeping of information on social media (2021) 0.01
    0.01168419 = product of:
      0.02336838 = sum of:
        0.02336838 = product of:
          0.04673676 = sum of:
            0.04673676 = weight(_text_:searching in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04673676 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since the inception of gatekeeping research in the 1940s, most studies on gatekeeping have been human-centric, treating and studying individuals as gatekeepers, who perform their gatekeeping role using a combination of the following mechanisms: forming communities, and/or broadcasting, discovering-searching, collecting, organizing, or protecting information. However, the nature of communication channels and how information is produced by and shared with users has fundamentally changed in the last 80 years. One significant change is the growing use of technology-enabled metadata like hashtags when sharing information on social media. Rarely any study investigates whether hashtags can perform gatekeeping of information and what it means for information gatekeeping. This paper fills in the gap by conducting a content analysis of 77 interdisciplinary studies on hashtags and gatekeeping to confirm how they can implement six gatekeeping mechanisms. This study shows that hashtags expand our understanding of the role of technology solutions in gatekeeping and advance research on hierarchical gatekeeping. The benefits of hashtags for gatekeeping suggest that they act as "information anchors" for online communities, thereby highlighting the utility of information gatekeepers for society.
  3. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.01
    0.010506795 = product of:
      0.02101359 = sum of:
        0.02101359 = product of:
          0.04202718 = sum of:
            0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04202718 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
  4. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.01
    0.008755663 = product of:
      0.017511327 = sum of:
        0.017511327 = product of:
          0.035022654 = sum of:
            0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035022654 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
  5. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.01
    0.008755663 = product of:
      0.017511327 = sum of:
        0.017511327 = product of:
          0.035022654 = sum of:
            0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035022654 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  6. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.01
    0.008755663 = product of:
      0.017511327 = sum of:
        0.017511327 = product of:
          0.035022654 = sum of:
            0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035022654 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
  7. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.01
    0.00700453 = product of:
      0.01400906 = sum of:
        0.01400906 = product of:
          0.02801812 = sum of:
            0.02801812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02801812 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051699217 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22