Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.02091168 = product of:
  0.04182336 = sum of:
    0.04182336 = product of:
      0.08364672 = sum of:
        0.08364672 = weight(_text_:22 in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08364672 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

2. 2.2003 18:31:22

0.012530192 = product of:
  0.025060384 = sum of:
    0.025060384 = product of:
      0.100241534 = sum of:
        0.100241534 = weight(_text_:authors in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100241534 = score(doc=1922,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The organisation of knowledge for exploitation and re-use in the modern enterprise is often a most perplexing challenge. The entire knowledge management life-cycle (for example - create, capture, organize, store, search, and transfer) is impacted by the organisation of intellectual capital into a corporate taxonomy or at the least a knowledge map (often incorrectly used interchangeably). Determining the extent to which such an objective is achieved is the focus of what is known as a knowledge audit. In this practice-oriented article, the authors review the fundamentals of creating a taxonomy, the use of metadata in a necessary process known as classification and the role of expertise locators where the knowledge is not explicit but resides within experts in the form of tacit knowledge. The authors conclude with a framework for developing a corporate taxonomy and how such a project may be executed. The conceptual contribution of this article is the postulation that corporate taxonomies that are designed to facilitate knowledge audits lead to greater organizational impact.

0.012322327 = product of:
  0.024644654 = sum of:
    0.024644654 = product of:
      0.04928931 = sum of:
        0.04928931 = weight(_text_:22 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04928931 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

004.67/8 22

DDC

004.67/8 22

0.010336881 = product of:
  0.020673761 = sum of:
    0.020673761 = product of:
      0.082695045 = sum of:
        0.082695045 = weight(_text_:authors in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082695045 = score(doc=5519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper compares two influential attempts at presenting a comprehensive framework of knowledge management. For each perspective the author examines theoretical foundations, highlights conceptual elements and themes, and discusses the role of information and information management. Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi analyze the dynamics of knowledge creation, particularly the importance of tacit knowledge and its conversion into explicit knowledge. Thomas H. Davenport and Lawrence Prusak focus on the design of organizational processes that enable knowledge generation, codification, and transfer. It is suggested that, to a degree, the concepts and practices of each model reflect the national cultures of their authors - Japan and the United States.

0.008860183 = product of:
  0.017720366 = sum of:
    0.017720366 = product of:
      0.07088146 = sum of:
        0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07088146 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research findings from the organizational theory tend to support the position that management uses Information Technology (IT) to maintain existing organizational hierarchy and control. Another body of research from information technology advocates suggests that Information Technology's inherent capabilities transform organization hierarchy and control outside of management's control. In addition, advocates from governmental change toward a more responsive type of government advocate adoption of IT as a form of change mechanism. This article explores these conflicting positions. The authors examines one instance of the development of a form of network organization within the federal government, and the processes of IT change that have occurred over the past 20 years. The agency selected for study is the Federal Emergency Management Administration

0.0073834863 = product of:
  0.0147669725 = sum of:
    0.0147669725 = product of:
      0.05906789 = sum of:
        0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05906789 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Today's publishing infrastructure is rapidly changing. As electronic journals, digital libraries, collaboratories, logic servers, and other knowledge infrastructures emerge an the internet, the key aspects of this transformation need to be identified. Knowledge is becoming increasingly dynamic and integrated. Instead of writing self-contained articles, authors are turning to the new practice of embedding their findings into dynamic networks of knowledge. Here, the author details the implications that this transformation is having an the creation, dissemination and organization of academic knowledge. The author Shows that many established publishing principles need to be given up in order to facilitate this transformation. The text provides valuable insights for knowledge managers, designers of internet-based knowledge infrastructures, and professionals in the publishing industry. Researchers will find the scenarios and implications for research processes stimulating and thought-provoking.

0.0069705606 = product of:
  0.013941121 = sum of:
    0.013941121 = product of:
      0.027882243 = sum of:
        0.027882243 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027882243 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7.11.2008 15:22:04