Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0056176563 = product of:
  0.03932359 = sum of:
    0.03932359 = product of:
      0.058985382 = sum of:
        0.029625945 = weight(_text_:29 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029625945 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
        0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359438 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.

Date

17. 2.2018 16:50:22

0.0026079838 = product of:
  0.018255886 = sum of:
    0.018255886 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018255886 = score(doc=369,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 369, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=369)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This study analyzes the search behavior of Dutch-speaking nursing students with a nonnative knowledge of English who searched for information in MEDLINE/PubMed about a specific theme in nursing. We examine whether and to what extent their search efficiency is affected by their language skills. Our task-oriented approach focuses on three stages of the information retrieval process: need articulation, query formulation, and relevance judgment. The test participants completed a pretest questionnaire, which gave us information about their overall experience with the search system and their self-reported computer and language skills. The students were briefly introduced to the use of PubMed and MeSH (medical subject headings) before they conducted their keyword-driven subject search. We assessed the search results in terms of recall and precision, and also analyzed the search process. After the search task, a satisfaction survey and a language test were completed. We conclude that language skills have an impact on the search results. We hypothesize that language support might improve the efficiency of searches conducted by Dutch-speaking users of PubMed.

0.0026079838 = product of:
  0.018255886 = sum of:
    0.018255886 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018255886 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Controversy is a complex concept that has been attracting attention of scholars from diverse fields. In the era of Internet and social media, detecting controversy and controversial concepts by the means of automatic methods is especially important. Web searchers could be alerted when the contents they consume are controversial or when they attempt to acquire information on disputed topics. Presenting users with the indications and explanations of the controversy should offer them chance to see the "wider picture" rather than letting them obtain one-sided views. In this work we first introduce a formal model of controversy as the basis of computational approaches to detecting controversial concepts. Then we propose a classification based method for automatic detection of controversial articles and categories in Wikipedia. Next, we demonstrate how to use the obtained results for the estimation of the controversy level of search queries. The proposed method can be incorporated into search engines as a component responsible for detection of queries related to controversial topics. The method is independent of the search engine's retrieval and search results recommendation algorithms, and is therefore unaffected by a possible filter bubble. Our approach can be also applied in Wikipedia or other knowledge bases for supporting the detection of controversy and content maintenance. Finally, we believe that our results could be useful for social science researchers for understanding the complex nature of controversy and in fostering their studies.

0.0013980685 = product of:
  0.009786479 = sum of:
    0.009786479 = product of:
      0.029359438 = sum of:
        0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359438 = score(doc=3460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

1. 6.2010 10:13:22

0.0013980685 = product of:
  0.009786479 = sum of:
    0.009786479 = product of:
      0.029359438 = sum of:
        0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359438 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

18.11.2014 13:22:03

0.0011756329 = product of:
  0.00822943 = sum of:
    0.00822943 = product of:
      0.024688289 = sum of:
        0.024688289 = weight(_text_:29 in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024688289 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

16. 3.2019 17:29:12