Search (173 results, page 9 of 9)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informationsmittel"
  1. Tsikerdekis, M.: Personal communication networks and their positive effects on online collaboration and outcome quality on Wikipedia : an empirical exploration (2016) 0.01 
    0.0083981585 = product of:
  0.016796317 = sum of:
    0.016796317 = product of:
      0.033592634 = sum of:
        0.033592634 = weight(_text_:i in 2846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033592634 = score(doc=2846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 2846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Online collaborative projects have been utilized in a variety of ways over the past decade, such as bringing people together to build open source software or developing the world's largest free encyclopedia. Personal communication networks as a feature do not exist in all collaborative projects. It is currently unclear if a designer's decision to include a personal communication network in a collaborative project's structure affects outcome quality. In this study, I investigated Wikipedia's personal communication network and analyzed which Wikipedia editors are utilizing it and how they are connected to outcome quality. Evidence suggests that people who utilize these networks are more experienced in editing high quality articles and are more integrated in the community. Additionally, these individuals utilize the personal communication network for coordinating and perhaps mentoring editors who edit lower quality articles. The value of these networks is demonstrated by the characteristics of the users who use them. These findings indicate that designers of online collaborative projects can help improve the quality of outcomes in these projects by deciding to implement a personal communication network in their communities.
  2. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.01 
    0.007239241 = product of:
  0.014478482 = sum of:
    0.014478482 = product of:
      0.028956965 = sum of:
        0.028956965 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028956965 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  3. Hill, L.L.; Zheng, Q.: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library : Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers (1999) 0.01 
    0.007239241 = product of:
  0.014478482 = sum of:
    0.014478482 = product of:
      0.028956965 = sum of:
        0.028956965 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028956965 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 20:22:45
  4. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.007239241 = product of:
  0.014478482 = sum of:
    0.014478482 = product of:
      0.028956965 = sum of:
        0.028956965 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028956965 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
  5. Chylkowska, E.: Implementation of information exchange : online dictionaries (2005) 0.01 
    0.007239241 = product of:
  0.014478482 = sum of:
    0.014478482 = product of:
      0.028956965 = sum of:
        0.028956965 = weight(_text_:22 in 3011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028956965 = score(doc=3011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:05:56
  6. Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020) 0.01 
    0.007239241 = product of:
  0.014478482 = sum of:
    0.014478482 = product of:
      0.028956965 = sum of:
        0.028956965 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028956965 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12.11.2020 13:22:09
  7. Veelen, I. van: ¬The truth according to Wikipedia (2008) 0.01 
    0.006718527 = product of:
  0.013437054 = sum of:
    0.013437054 = product of:
      0.026874108 = sum of:
        0.026874108 = weight(_text_:i in 2139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026874108 = score(doc=2139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 2139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2139)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Using the mathematical literature (2004) 0.01 
    0.0058787116 = product of:
  0.011757423 = sum of:
    0.011757423 = product of:
      0.023514846 = sum of:
        0.023514846 = weight(_text_:i in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023514846 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  9. Kubiszewski, I.; Cleveland, C.J.: ¬The Encyclopedia of Earth (2007) 0.01 
    0.0058787116 = product of:
  0.011757423 = sum of:
    0.011757423 = product of:
      0.023514846 = sum of:
        0.023514846 = weight(_text_:i in 1170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023514846 = score(doc=1170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.14585242 = fieldWeight in 1170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1170)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Fallis, D.: Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia (2008) 0.01 
    0.0057913926 = product of:
  0.011582785 = sum of:
    0.011582785 = product of:
      0.02316557 = sum of:
        0.02316557 = weight(_text_:22 in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02316557 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Wikipedia (the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this article argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., Web sites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This article suggests that to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does. Somebody who reads Wikipedia is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom, says Mr. McHenry, Britannica's former editor. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him. One wonders whether people like Mr. McHenry would prefer there to be no public lavatories at all. The Economist (Vol. 379, April 22, 2006, pp. 14-15)
  11. Encyclopædia Britannica 2003 (2002) 0.00 
    0.0041990792 = product of:
  0.0083981585 = sum of:
    0.0083981585 = product of:
      0.016796317 = sum of:
        0.016796317 = weight(_text_:i in 1701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016796317 = score(doc=1701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.10418029 = fieldWeight in 1701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  12. Katz, W.A.: Introduction to reference work : Vol.1: Basic information sources; vol.2: Reference services and reference processes (1992) 0.00 
    0.0041990792 = product of:
  0.0083981585 = sum of:
    0.0083981585 = product of:
      0.016796317 = sum of:
        0.016796317 = weight(_text_:i in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016796317 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122356 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.10418029 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    i
  13. Lipow, A.G.: ¬The virtual reference librarian's handbook (2003) 0.00 
    0.0036196206 = product of:
  0.007239241 = sum of:
    0.007239241 = product of:
      0.014478482 = sum of:
        0.014478482 = weight(_text_:22 in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014478482 = score(doc=3992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14968662 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04274526 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2004 14:46:50

Authors

Years

Types

  • i 112
  • m 65
  • a 54
  • el 41
  • b 11
  • s 9
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications