Search (124 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03
    0.027316216 = product of:
      0.06829054 = sum of:
        0.0249436 = weight(_text_:der in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0249436 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1010686 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045245815 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.04334694 = product of:
          0.08669388 = sum of:
            0.08669388 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08669388 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  2. Lercher, A.: Correlation over time for citations to mathematics articles (2013) 0.02
    0.02175036 = product of:
      0.1087518 = sum of:
        0.1087518 = sum of:
          0.07810088 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07810088 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045245815 = queryNorm
              0.30879927 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
          0.030650917 = weight(_text_:22 in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030650917 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045245815 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:23:35
    Field
    Mathematik
  3. Hooydonk, G. Van: Journal production and journal impact factor (1996) 0.01
    0.012496143 = product of:
      0.06248071 = sum of:
        0.06248071 = product of:
          0.12496142 = sum of:
            0.12496142 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 7225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12496142 = score(doc=7225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.49407884 = fieldWeight in 7225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Mathematik
  4. Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Grupp, H.: ¬The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 scientific areas, 1989-1993 : Pt.1: All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics (1995) 0.01
    0.010934125 = product of:
      0.05467062 = sum of:
        0.05467062 = product of:
          0.10934124 = sum of:
            0.10934124 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10934124 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.432319 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Mathematik
  5. Dees, W.: "Publication power approach" (2013) 0.01
    0.009877162 = product of:
      0.04938581 = sum of:
        0.04938581 = weight(_text_:der in 924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04938581 = score(doc=924,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.1010686 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045245815 = queryNorm
            0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 924, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=924)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Publikationslandschaft der Erziehungswissenschaft ist durch eine enorme Breite undVielfalt sowie zahlreiche Verbindungen in benachbarte Felder gekennzeichnet. Aktuelle Analysen zum Publikationsverhalten von Erziehungswissenschaftlern zeigen, dass diese Hunderte von verschiedenen Zeitschriften und Verlagen zur Veröffentlichung nutzen. Um aus dieser Fülle an Publikationsorten die bedeutendsten zu ermitteln, wird ein neuer Ansatz zur Zeitschriftenbewertung, der "publication power approach" von Holsapple, auf die deutsche Erziehungswissenschaft übertragen. Dieser Ansatz basiert auf dem Publikationsverhalten von Forschern an ausgewählten Institutionen und stellt eine Alternative zu Expertenbefragungen und Zitationsanalysen dar. Der Beitrag stellt wesentlich Ergebnisse zur "publication power" von Zeitschriften und Verlagen der Erziehungswissenschaft vor und diskutiert Vor- und Nachteile dieses Ansatzes im Vergleich zu den herkömmlichen Bewertungsmethoden.
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.12
    Source
    Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation: Proceedings der 12. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Bonn, 19. bis 21. Oktober 2009. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly
  6. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01
    0.009808294 = product of:
      0.04904147 = sum of:
        0.04904147 = product of:
          0.09808294 = sum of:
            0.09808294 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808294 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.009808294 = product of:
      0.04904147 = sum of:
        0.04904147 = product of:
          0.09808294 = sum of:
            0.09808294 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808294 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  8. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.01
    0.009808294 = product of:
      0.04904147 = sum of:
        0.04904147 = product of:
          0.09808294 = sum of:
            0.09808294 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09808294 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  9. Frandsen, T.F.: ¬The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system : three science fields (2009) 0.01
    0.009372107 = product of:
      0.04686053 = sum of:
        0.04686053 = product of:
          0.09372106 = sum of:
            0.09372106 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09372106 = score(doc=4210,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Mathematik
  10. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.01
    0.009372107 = product of:
      0.04686053 = sum of:
        0.04686053 = product of:
          0.09372106 = sum of:
            0.09372106 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09372106 = score(doc=4994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.37055913 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Mathematik
  11. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.01
    0.0086693885 = product of:
      0.04334694 = sum of:
        0.04334694 = product of:
          0.08669388 = sum of:
            0.08669388 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08669388 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  12. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.01
    0.008582257 = product of:
      0.042911284 = sum of:
        0.042911284 = product of:
          0.08582257 = sum of:
            0.08582257 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08582257 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  13. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01
    0.008582257 = product of:
      0.042911284 = sum of:
        0.042911284 = product of:
          0.08582257 = sum of:
            0.08582257 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08582257 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  14. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.; Rowland, F.: ¬The citation advantage of open-access articles (2008) 0.01
    0.0078100883 = product of:
      0.03905044 = sum of:
        0.03905044 = product of:
          0.07810088 = sum of:
            0.07810088 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 2374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07810088 = score(doc=2374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.30879927 = fieldWeight in 2374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Mathematik
  15. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel : die Verwendung von Fragezeichen im Titel von wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenbeiträgen in der Medizin, den Lebenswissenschaften und in der Physik von 1966 bis 2005 (2007) 0.01
    0.007808582 = product of:
      0.03904291 = sum of:
        0.03904291 = weight(_text_:der in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03904291 = score(doc=635,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1010686 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045245815 = queryNorm
            0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Titel wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen sind von besonderer Bedeutung. Wir haben fast 20 Millionen wissenschaftliche Artikel untersucht und den Anteil von Artikeln mit einem Fragezeichen am Ende des Titels im Laufe der letzten 40 Jahre analysiert. Unsere Studie beschränkte sich auf die Disziplinen Physik, Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Dabei haben wir eine deutliche Zunahme der Fragezeichen-Artikel von 50 Prozent auf mehr als 200 Prozent feststellten können. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden im vorliegenden Beitrag die grundsätzlichen Funktionen und Strukturen der Titel wissenschaftlicher Publikationen untersucht. Wir gehen davon aus, dass Marketing-Aspekte die entscheidenden Beweggründe sind für die zunehmende Nutzung von Fragezeichen-Titeln bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen.
  16. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.01
    0.00735622 = product of:
      0.0367811 = sum of:
        0.0367811 = product of:
          0.0735622 = sum of:
            0.0735622 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0735622 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  17. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01
    0.00735622 = product of:
      0.0367811 = sum of:
        0.0367811 = product of:
          0.0735622 = sum of:
            0.0735622 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0735622 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  18. Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015) 0.01
    0.0066713416 = product of:
      0.016678354 = sum of:
        0.0074830796 = weight(_text_:der in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074830796 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1010686 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045245815 = queryNorm
            0.07403961 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
        0.009195275 = product of:
          0.01839055 = sum of:
            0.01839055 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01839055 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15844314 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics. Der Beitrag ist frei verfügbar.
  19. Bensman, S.J.; Smolinsky, L.J.; Pudovkin, A.I.: Mean citation rate per article in mathematics journals : differences from the scientific model (2010) 0.01
    0.0062480713 = product of:
      0.031240355 = sum of:
        0.031240355 = product of:
          0.06248071 = sum of:
            0.06248071 = weight(_text_:mathematik in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06248071 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25291798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045245815 = queryNorm
                0.24703942 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.5898643 = idf(docFreq=448, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Field
    Mathematik
  20. Vasiljev, A.: ¬The law of requisite variety as applied to subject indexing and retrieval (1989) 0.01
    0.0059864637 = product of:
      0.029932318 = sum of:
        0.029932318 = weight(_text_:der in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029932318 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1010686 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045245815 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Ordnung. Tagungsband 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Darmstadt 17.-19.3.1988. Hrsg.: R. Wille

Years