Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- author's%3a%22Alani%2c H.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Alani%2c H.%22 6
-
Calculating the h-index : Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar? (2011)
0.02
0.015624595 = product of: 0.03124919 = sum of: 0.03124919 = product of: 0.06249838 = sum of: 0.06249838 = weight(_text_:h in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.06249838 = score(doc=854,freq=8.0), product of: 0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.045821942 = queryNorm 0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 854, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=854) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Gegenüberstellung der Berechnung des h-Index in den drei Tools mit Beispiel Stephen Hawking (WoS: 59, Scopus: 19, Google Scholar: 76)
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- https://dspace.ndlr.ie/jspui/bitstream/10633/27353/9/H%20index%20datasheet.pdf
-
Schreiber, M.: Restricting the h-index to a citation time window : a case study of a timed Hirsch index (2014)
0.01
0.012499675 = product of: 0.02499935 = sum of: 0.02499935 = product of: 0.0499987 = sum of: 0.0499987 = weight(_text_:h in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0499987 = score(doc=1563,freq=8.0), product of: 0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.045821942 = queryNorm 0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The h-index has been shown to increase in many cases mostly because of citations to rather old publications. This inertia can be circumvented by restricting the evaluation to a citation time window. Here I report results of an empirical study analyzing the evolution of the thus defined timed h-index in dependence on the length of the citation time window.
- Object
- h-index