Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Calculating the h-index : Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar? (2011) 0.02
    0.015624595 = product of:
      0.03124919 = sum of:
        0.03124919 = product of:
          0.06249838 = sum of:
            0.06249838 = weight(_text_:h in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06249838 = score(doc=854,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gegenüberstellung der Berechnung des h-Index in den drei Tools mit Beispiel Stephen Hawking (WoS: 59, Scopus: 19, Google Scholar: 76)
    Object
    h-index
    Source
    https://dspace.ndlr.ie/jspui/bitstream/10633/27353/9/H%20index%20datasheet.pdf
  2. Schreiber, M.: Restricting the h-index to a citation time window : a case study of a timed Hirsch index (2014) 0.01
    0.012499675 = product of:
      0.02499935 = sum of:
        0.02499935 = product of:
          0.0499987 = sum of:
            0.0499987 = weight(_text_:h in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0499987 = score(doc=1563,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.113842286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045821942 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The h-index has been shown to increase in many cases mostly because of citations to rather old publications. This inertia can be circumvented by restricting the evaluation to a citation time window. Here I report results of an empirical study analyzing the evolution of the thus defined timed h-index in dependence on the length of the citation time window.
    Object
    h-index