Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"s"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. How should citations to articles in high and low impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0019582848 = product of:
  0.0039165695 = sum of:
    0.0039165695 = product of:
      0.007833139 = sum of:
        0.007833139 = weight(_text_:a in 7169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007833139 = score(doc=7169,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 7169, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Briefly discusses the normalization factors allowing quatitative comparison between various disciplines and then proposes a formula for taking into account the value of citations to papers published in journals with different impact factors
  2. Rip, A.: Qualitative conditions of scientometrics : the new challenges (1997) 0.00 
    0.0019582848 = product of:
  0.0039165695 = sum of:
    0.0039165695 = product of:
      0.007833139 = sum of:
        0.007833139 = weight(_text_:a in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007833139 = score(doc=408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Explains how a closer look at how scientometricians aggregate building blocks into artfully made products, and point-represent these (e.g. as the map of field X) allows one to overcome the dependence on judgements of scientists for validation, and replace or complement these with intrinsic validation, based on quality checks of the several steps
  3. Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1995) 0.00 
    0.0016616598 = product of:
  0.0033233196 = sum of:
    0.0033233196 = product of:
      0.006646639 = sum of:
        0.006646639 = weight(_text_:a in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006646639 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Koenig, M.E.D. u. A. Bookstein
  4. Luukkonen, T.: Why has Latour's theory of citation been ignored by the bibliometric community? : Discussion od sociological interpretations of citation analysis (1997) 0.00 
    0.0015666279 = product of:
  0.0031332558 = sum of:
    0.0031332558 = product of:
      0.0062665115 = sum of:
        0.0062665115 = weight(_text_:a in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062665115 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037706986 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Discusses the often lamented lack of a theory of citations, and the lack of a sociological theory in particular. Draws attention to one proposed theory and discusses the potential reasons why it has not been generally accepted as the theory of citations, despite its merits in explaining many phenomena in the citation behaviour of scientists. This theory has been expounded by B. Latour and presented, in particular, in his book entitled 'Science in action'

Authors