-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.02
0.021847088 = product of:
0.050976537 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0097344695 = weight(_text_:a in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0097344695 = score(doc=80,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.020076746 = product of:
0.040153492 = sum of:
0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040153492 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- There is a decrease in the incidence of explicit references to a paper over time, hence the assumption that information ages. In a study which attempts to discover whether information really ages it is necessary to include eponyms, anonyms and footnote references. Reports a pilot study which demonstrates that there is an increase over time in the frequency of use of eponyms
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
- Type
- a
-
Schwens, U.: Feasibility of exploiting bibliometric data in European national bibliographic databases (1999)
0.02
0.019730791 = product of:
0.06905777 = sum of:
0.061439343 = weight(_text_:u in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061439343 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 3792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076184273 = score(doc=3792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3792)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Persson, O.; Melin, G.: Equalization, growth and integration of science (1996)
0.02
0.019190311 = product of:
0.06716609 = sum of:
0.057740733 = weight(_text_:g in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057740733 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.00942536 = weight(_text_:a in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00942536 = score(doc=6698,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Presents a study of the production of scientific papers, coauthorships and R&D expenditures in the OECD countries. Discusses the distribution of papers in the journal 'Science' by OECD country in comparison with 'Science Citation Index' papers as a whole and compares these to the distribution of R&D investments
- Type
- a
-
Schoepflin, U.; Glänzel, W.: Mehrwert von bibliographischen Datenbanken (1994)
0.02
0.016912106 = product of:
0.05919237 = sum of:
0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05266229 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 6112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=6112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6112)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1995)
0.02
0.016912106 = product of:
0.05919237 = sum of:
0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05266229 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006530081 = score(doc=7868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Editor
- Koenig, M.E.D. u. A. Bookstein
-
Hooydonk, G. Van: Journal production and journal impact factor (1996)
0.02
0.015352251 = product of:
0.053732876 = sum of:
0.046192586 = weight(_text_:g in 7225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046192586 = score(doc=7225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 7225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7225)
0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 7225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007540288 = score(doc=7225,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7225, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7225)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- There exists a direct linear relation between journal production and impact factor. The more articles a 'normal' journal publishes, the larger its impact factor. Review journals and translation journals are clear exceptions to this rule. The field of mathematics and chemistry seem to be large scale exceptions
- Type
- a
-
Mahapatra, G.: Indian library and information science journals : a bibliometric analysis of the rate of citations and their characteristics (1993)
0.01
0.013724841 = product of:
0.04803694 = sum of:
0.040418513 = weight(_text_:g in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040418513 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.29048425 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076184273 = score(doc=112,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A bibliometric analysis of 1,456 articles appearing in Indian Library and Information Science journals between 1975 and 1985 revealed that the average rate of citations per article in the field was quite low. Books and journals were identified as the major categories of documents referred to in these articles and both were positively related. It is concluded that the increase in journal citations and rate of citations between 1975 and 1985 indicates that Indian Library and Information Science journals are now publishing a higher number of research-oriented articles in comparison with earlier years.
- Type
- a
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.01
0.013116683 = product of:
0.045908388 = sum of:
0.010774084 = weight(_text_:a in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010774084 = score(doc=6902,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.035134304 = product of:
0.07026861 = sum of:
0.07026861 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07026861 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Type
- a
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.01
0.013116683 = product of:
0.045908388 = sum of:
0.010774084 = weight(_text_:a in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010774084 = score(doc=4689,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.035134304 = product of:
0.07026861 = sum of:
0.07026861 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07026861 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Type
- a
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.01
0.012833249 = product of:
0.04491637 = sum of:
0.00942536 = weight(_text_:a in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00942536 = score(doc=3690,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.03549101 = product of:
0.07098202 = sum of:
0.07098202 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07098202 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Derives a 'literature variable exponential growth model' from Price's literature growth model. The research shows that the new model is more convincing than the former ones. Gives detailed calculation procedure, examples, parameter values and mean square errors
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
- Type
- a
-
Melin, G.; Persson, O.: Hotel cosmopolitan : a bibliometric study of collaboration at some European universities (1998)
0.01
0.01198437 = product of:
0.041945294 = sum of:
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.007300853 = weight(_text_:a in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007300853 = score(doc=329,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The collaborative pattern of all Nordic universities, as well as a few universities in the UK and the Netherlands, is analyzed using institutionally co-authored articles retrieved from Science Citation Index. The study shows that there are no major differences between universities of various size when it comes to the proportion of articles with internal, national, or international co-authorships. There are some country variations, but within each country, the differences among the universities are small, if any. When co-authorships were fractionalized according to the number of times a given university occurs among the addresses of an article, there were still no significant differences between universities of varying size. Since external collaboration, whether it is national or international, accounts for more than half of all articles produced by the universities, one is inclined to conclude that the universities function as a kind of cosmopolitan hotel housing nodes of scientific networks that are becoming increasingly international
- Type
- a
-
Hooydonk, G. Van: Standardizing relative impacts : estimating the quality of research from citation counts (1998)
0.01
0.011217687 = product of:
0.039261904 = sum of:
0.03464444 = weight(_text_:g in 1791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464444 = score(doc=1791,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13914184 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24898648 = fieldWeight in 1791, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1791)
0.0046174643 = weight(_text_:a in 1791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046174643 = score(doc=1791,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1791, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1791)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The relative impact of local research units is obtained by dividing the observed number of citations to their publications by the expected number of citations. It is argued that the expected citation rates used in the standard method cannot lead to relevant bibliometric scores for specific research topics. Extracting information about quality of research with the standard method is, therefore almost impossible. The existence of empirical relations between the number of citations and the number of publications for scientific disciplines and for journals, leads to alternative ways to determine relative impact. Hereby, refernce data are taken from within a given research topic. Only observed citation and publication (activity) patterns for research topics are taken into account for calculating bibliometric scores. The new methods are not restricted to ISI-publications. The rsulting bibliometric scores can contain information about the quality of research, and lead to different rankings than those obtained with the standard methods, although the same citation and publication data are used
- Type
- a
-
Vinkler, P.: Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations : the chance for citedness model (1996)
0.01
0.009757837 = product of:
0.03415243 = sum of:
0.026456656 = product of:
0.052913312 = sum of:
0.052913312 = weight(_text_:p in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052913312 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007695774 = weight(_text_:a in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007695774 = score(doc=5077,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Chances for information to be cited (CC) depend on disciplines and topics because of different publication and referencing practices. However, the developmental rate of knowledge strongly influences CC as well. By a simple model concludes that CC are the greater the faster the publication rate
- Type
- a
-
White, M.D.; Wang, P.: ¬A qualitative study of citing behaviour : contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns (1997)
0.01
0.009093973 = product of:
0.031828903 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010663576 = weight(_text_:a in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010663576 = score(doc=43,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Reports a qualitative study of the citing motivations of 12 agricultural economists (faculty and doctoral students), identifying several factors they considered in making citing decisions. Reports citing behaviour derived from a larger empirical, longitudinal study tracing document use during research projects and thus includes behaviour related to decisions both to cite and not to cite. An important finding is the existence of metalevel concerns that influence a decision to cite a document, in addition to situational factors related to its actual use during research
- Type
- a
-
Alvarez, P.; Pulgarin, A.: ¬The Rasch model : measuring the impact of scientific journals: analytical chemistry (1996)
0.01
0.008534885 = product of:
0.029872097 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=8505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008706774 = score(doc=8505,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Focuses on a way to determine a ranking of science journals according to the number of citations-to and items-published data used by Science Citation Insitute of Citation Reports of the Institute for Science Information to determine journal ranking by impact factor. Applies latent traits theory to bibliometrics
- Type
- a
-
Christensen, F.H.; Ingwersen, P.: Online citation analysis : a methodological approach (1996)
0.01
0.008201604 = product of:
0.028705612 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 6691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=6691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 6691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007540288 = weight(_text_:a in 6691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007540288 = score(doc=6691,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 6691, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6691)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Investigates the possibilities and limitations of online citation analysis. The Dialog online processing tools RANK, MAP and TARGET are used to perform analysis of citations to and from isolated sets of documents as well as to carry out diachrone journal analysis. Discusses the implications of this analysis on the journal impact factors of ISI journals. Suggests that by the combined application of RANK and TARGET, a hitherto overlooked possibility of the online analysis of bibliographic coupling and mapping of scientific fields has been revealed
- Type
- a
-
Alvarez, P.; Pulgarin, A.: ¬The diffusion of scientific journals analyzed through citations (1997)
0.01
0.007957226 = product of:
0.027850289 = sum of:
0.018519659 = product of:
0.037039317 = sum of:
0.037039317 = weight(_text_:p in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037039317 = score(doc=1595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009330629 = weight(_text_:a in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009330629 = score(doc=1595,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes a method for analysing the diffusion of scientific journals, using the Rasch model as the measuring instrument. It is applied to the 10-year distribution of citations to journals of the subject category 'physics' by year of publication of cited articles with data obtained from the SCI Journal Citation Reports of ISI for the year 1994. Diffusion in a scientific field would be regarded as the dissemination of knowledge, channelled through citations that an distributed over different periods of time and propagated by means of scientific journals: here it is considered to be a latent variable defined by a particular set of items (the citations made in different time periods), and the Rasch model is used as an instrument for measuring that variable
- Type
- a
-
Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998)
0.01
0.00780627 = product of:
0.027321944 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006156619 = score(doc=1023,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Since the 'Science Citation Index' emerged within the system of scientific communication in 1964, an intense controversy about its character has been raging: in what sense can citation analysis be trusted? This debate can be characterized as the confrontation of different perspectives on science. Discusses the citation representation of science: the way the citation creates a new reality of as well as in the world of science; the main features of this reality; and some implications for science and science policy
- Type
- a
-
Gupta, B.M.; Sharma, P.; Karisiddappa, C.R.: Growth of research literature in scientific specialities : a modelling perspective (1997)
0.01
0.00780627 = product of:
0.027321944 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 1040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=1040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 1040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 1040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006156619 = score(doc=1040,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1040, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1040)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Type
- a
-
Rivas, A.L.; Deshler, J.D.; Quimby, F.W.; Mohammend, H.O.; Wilson, D.J.; Gonzales, R.N.; Lein, D.H.; Bruso, P.: Interdisciplinary question generation : synthesis and validity analysis of the 1993-1997 bovine mastitis related literature (1998)
0.01
0.00780627 = product of:
0.027321944 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 5124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=5124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 5124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 5124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006156619 = score(doc=5124,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5124, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5124)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes research in which interdisciplinary synthesis and validity analysis (ISVA), a structured learning approach which integrates learning and communication theories, meta analytic evaluation methods, and literature management related technologies, was applied in the context of the 1993-1997 bovine mastitis research literature. The study investigated whether ISVA could facilitate the analysis and synthesis of interdisciplinary knowledge claims and generate projects or research questions
- Type
- a
