Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.03
    0.025665602 = product of:
      0.10266241 = sum of:
        0.10266241 = product of:
          0.1539936 = sum of:
            0.077344686 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077344686 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.07664892 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664892 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  2. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.012832801 = product of:
      0.051331203 = sum of:
        0.051331203 = product of:
          0.0769968 = sum of:
            0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038672343 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
            0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03832446 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  3. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.01
    0.011643264 = product of:
      0.023286529 = sum of:
        0.0123366825 = product of:
          0.024673365 = sum of:
            0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673365 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010949845 = product of:
          0.032849535 = sum of:
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  4. Christensen, F.H.; Ingwersen, P.: Online citation analysis : a methodological approach (1996) 0.01
    0.008224455 = product of:
      0.03289782 = sum of:
        0.03289782 = product of:
          0.06579564 = sum of:
            0.06579564 = weight(_text_:online in 6691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06579564 = score(doc=6691,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 6691, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the possibilities and limitations of online citation analysis. The Dialog online processing tools RANK, MAP and TARGET are used to perform analysis of citations to and from isolated sets of documents as well as to carry out diachrone journal analysis. Discusses the implications of this analysis on the journal impact factors of ISI journals. Suggests that by the combined application of RANK and TARGET, a hitherto overlooked possibility of the online analysis of bibliographic coupling and mapping of scientific fields has been revealed
  5. Youngen, G.K.: Citation patterns to traditional and electronic preprints in the published literature (1998) 0.01
    0.00815221 = product of:
      0.03260884 = sum of:
        0.03260884 = product of:
          0.06521768 = sum of:
            0.06521768 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06521768 = score(doc=3360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.32709154 = fieldWeight in 3360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  6. Lardy, J.P.; Herzhaft, L.: Bibliometric treatments according to bibliographic errors and data heterogenity : the end-user point of view (1992) 0.01
    0.007196398 = product of:
      0.028785592 = sum of:
        0.028785592 = product of:
          0.057571184 = sum of:
            0.057571184 = weight(_text_:online in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057571184 = score(doc=5064,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of online and CD-ROM databases is far from satisfactory. Errors are frequently found in listings from online searches. Spelling mistakes are the most common but there are also more misleading errors such as variations of an author's name or absence of homogenity in the content of certain field. Describes breifly a bibliometric study of large amounts of data downloaded from databases to investigate bibliographic errors and data heterogeneity. Recommends that database producers should consider either the implementation of a common format or the recommendations of the Société Française de Bibliométrie
    Source
    Online information 92. Proc. of the 16th Int. Online Information Meeting, London, 8-10.12.1992. Ed. by David I. Raitt
  7. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.01
    0.006452258 = product of:
      0.025809033 = sum of:
        0.025809033 = product of:
          0.0774271 = sum of:
            0.0774271 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0774271 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  8. Khurshid, A.; Sahai, H.: Bibliometric, scientometric and informetric distributions and laws : a selected bibliography (1991) 0.01
    0.0064453906 = product of:
      0.025781563 = sum of:
        0.025781563 = product of:
          0.077344686 = sum of:
            0.077344686 = weight(_text_:29 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077344686 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991) no.2, S.18-29
  9. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.01
    0.00638741 = product of:
      0.02554964 = sum of:
        0.02554964 = product of:
          0.07664892 = sum of:
            0.07664892 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664892 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01
    0.00638741 = product of:
      0.02554964 = sum of:
        0.02554964 = product of:
          0.07664892 = sum of:
            0.07664892 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664892 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.01
    0.006232264 = product of:
      0.024929056 = sum of:
        0.024929056 = product of:
          0.049858112 = sum of:
            0.049858112 = weight(_text_:online in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049858112 = score(doc=7827,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  12. Hudnut, S.K.: Finding answers by the numbers : statistical analysis of online search results (1993) 0.01
    0.0061683413 = product of:
      0.024673365 = sum of:
        0.024673365 = product of:
          0.04934673 = sum of:
            0.04934673 = weight(_text_:online in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04934673 = score(doc=555,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Online searchers today no longer limit themselves to locating references to articles. More and more, they are called upon to locate specific answers to questions such as: Who is my chief competitor for this technology? Who is publishing the most on this subject? What is the geographic distribution of this product? These questions demand answers, not necessarily from record content, but from statistical analysis of the terms in a set of records. Most online services now provide a tool for statistical analysis such as GET on Orbit, ZOOM on ESA/IRS and RANK/RANK FILES on Dialog. With these commands, users can analyze term frequency to extrapolate very precise answers to a wide range of questions. This paper discusses the many uses of term frequency analysis and how it can be applied to areas of competitive intelligence, market analysis, bibliometric analysis and improvements of search results. The applications are illustrated by examples from Dialog
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  13. Wormell, I.: Online searching is like gold-washing (1998) 0.01
    0.0058155684 = product of:
      0.023262274 = sum of:
        0.023262274 = product of:
          0.046524547 = sum of:
            0.046524547 = weight(_text_:online in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046524547 = score(doc=3361,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Draws attention to the vast potential of online information databases and to the many new possibilities which advanced search techniques offer those who want to explore databases. Looks at informetrics, an emerging subfield in information science, which is based on the combination of advanced information retrieval and quantitative studies of information flow. Describes 3 studies carried out at the Centre for Information studies at the Royal School of Library and Information Science in Copenhagen, Denmark, to illustrate the scope and nature of informetric analysis
  14. Duff, A.S.: ¬The '¬information society' as paradigm : a bibliometric enquiry (1995) 0.01
    0.005140284 = product of:
      0.020561136 = sum of:
        0.020561136 = product of:
          0.041122273 = sum of:
            0.041122273 = weight(_text_:online in 3799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041122273 = score(doc=3799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the claim that the 'information society' constitutes a new paradigm and describes the use of online bibliometrics to investigate this claim. Judges by its bibliometric behaviour, it is not yet possible to say with any certainty that the 'information society' has achieved paradigmatic status
  15. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.00
    0.0046038507 = product of:
      0.018415403 = sum of:
        0.018415403 = product of:
          0.055246208 = sum of:
            0.055246208 = weight(_text_:29 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055246208 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 23(1998) no.2, S.20-29
  16. Klein, G.M.: Is there a standard default keyword operator? : a bibliometric analysis of processing options chosen by libraries to execute keyword searches in online public access catalogs (1994) 0.00
    0.0041122274 = product of:
      0.01644891 = sum of:
        0.01644891 = product of:
          0.03289782 = sum of:
            0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 2200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03289782 = score(doc=2200,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 2200, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2200)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.00
    0.0036830807 = product of:
      0.014732323 = sum of:
        0.014732323 = product of:
          0.044196967 = sum of:
            0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044196967 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 29(1994) no.2, S.253-269
  18. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.00
    0.0036499486 = product of:
      0.0145997945 = sum of:
        0.0145997945 = product of:
          0.04379938 = sum of:
            0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04379938 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  19. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.00
    0.0036499486 = product of:
      0.0145997945 = sum of:
        0.0145997945 = product of:
          0.04379938 = sum of:
            0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04379938 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  20. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.00
    0.0036499486 = product of:
      0.0145997945 = sum of:
        0.0145997945 = product of:
          0.04379938 = sum of:
            0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04379938 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25