-
He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009)
0.01
0.009337518 = product of:
0.018675037 = sum of:
0.018675037 = product of:
0.037350073 = sum of:
0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037350073 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 9.2009 11:22:05
-
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006)
0.01
0.007781266 = product of:
0.015562532 = sum of:
0.015562532 = product of:
0.031125063 = sum of:
0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031125063 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:11:05
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.01
0.007781266 = product of:
0.015562532 = sum of:
0.015562532 = product of:
0.031125063 = sum of:
0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031125063 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.007781266 = product of:
0.015562532 = sum of:
0.015562532 = product of:
0.031125063 = sum of:
0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031125063 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
-
Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009)
0.01
0.007781266 = product of:
0.015562532 = sum of:
0.015562532 = product of:
0.031125063 = sum of:
0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031125063 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:52:50
-
Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009)
0.01
0.007781266 = product of:
0.015562532 = sum of:
0.015562532 = product of:
0.031125063 = sum of:
0.031125063 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031125063 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:02:48
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0062250122 = product of:
0.0124500245 = sum of:
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024900049 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Wolfram, D.: Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (2003)
0.01
0.0054969285 = product of:
0.010993857 = sum of:
0.010993857 = product of:
0.021987714 = sum of:
0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021987714 = score(doc=4589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Harries, G.; Wilkinson, D.; Price, L.; Fairclough, R.; Thelwall, M.: Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping : making sense of it all (2005)
0.01
0.0054969285 = product of:
0.010993857 = sum of:
0.010993857 = product of:
0.021987714 = sum of:
0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021987714 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nah, I.W.; Kang, D.-S.; Lee, D.-H.; Chung, Y.-C.: ¬A bibliometric evaluation of research performance in different subject categories (2009)
0.00
0.0045347353 = product of:
0.009069471 = sum of:
0.009069471 = product of:
0.018138941 = sum of:
0.018138941 = weight(_text_:d in 2772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018138941 = score(doc=2772,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.2077985 = fieldWeight in 2772, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2772)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ravichandra Rao, I.K.; Sahoo, B.B.: Studies and research in informetrics at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC), ISI Bangalore (2006)
0.00
0.003886916 = product of:
0.007773832 = sum of:
0.007773832 = product of:
0.015547664 = sum of:
0.015547664 = weight(_text_:d in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015547664 = score(doc=1512,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Contributions of DRTC to informetric studies and research are discussed. A report on recent work - a quantitative country-wise analysis of software literature based on the data from two bibliographic databases i.e. COMPENDEX and INSPEC is presented. The number of countries involved in R & D activities in software in the most productive group is increasing. The research contribution on software is decreasing in developed countries as compared to that in developing and less developed countries. India 's contribution is only 1.1% and it has remained constant over the period of 12 years 1989-2001. The number of countries involved in R&D activities in software has been increasing in the 1990s. It is also noted that higher the budget for higher education, higher the number of publications; and that higher the number of publications, higher the export as well as the domestic consumption of software.
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002)
0.00
0.0036646193 = product of:
0.0073292386 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = product of:
0.014658477 = sum of:
0.014658477 = weight(_text_:d in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014658477 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Elkiss, A.; Shen, S.; Fader, A.; Erkan, G.; States, D.; Radev, D.: Blind men and elephants : what do citation summaries tell us about a research article? (2008)
0.00
0.0032390966 = product of:
0.006478193 = sum of:
0.006478193 = product of:
0.012956386 = sum of:
0.012956386 = weight(_text_:d in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012956386 = score(doc=1339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: ¬A cast of thousands : Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=1731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bagrow, J.P.; Rozenfeld, H.D.; Bollt, E.M.; Ben-Avraham, D.: How famous is a scientist? : famous to those who know us (2004)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008)
0.00
0.0032065418 = product of:
0.0064130835 = sum of:
0.0064130835 = product of:
0.012826167 = sum of:
0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012826167 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hassan, E.: Simultaneous mapping of interactions between scientific and technological knowledge bases : the case of space communications (2003)
0.00
0.0027484642 = product of:
0.0054969285 = sum of:
0.0054969285 = product of:
0.010993857 = sum of:
0.010993857 = weight(_text_:d in 1472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010993857 = score(doc=1472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article examines the knowledge structure of the field of space communications using bibliometric mapping techniques based an textual analysis. A new approach with the aim of visualizing simultaneously the configuration of its scientific and technological knowledge bases is presented. This approach enabled us to overcome various limits of existing bibliometric methods dealing with science and technology relationships. The bibliometric map revealed weck cognitive interactions between science and technology at the worldwide level, although it brought out the systemic nature of the process of knowledge production at either side. We extended the mapping approach to the R&D activities of the Triad countries in order to characterize their specialization profiles and cognitive links an both sides in comparison with the structure of the field at the worldwide level. Results showed different patterns in the way the Triad countries organized their scientific and technological activities within the field.
