Search (89 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  2. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
  3. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  4. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  5. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.01
    0.009312166 = product of:
      0.018624332 = sum of:
        0.018624332 = product of:
          0.037248664 = sum of:
            0.037248664 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037248664 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  6. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01
    0.007837306 = product of:
      0.015674612 = sum of:
        0.015674612 = product of:
          0.031349223 = sum of:
            0.031349223 = weight(_text_:m in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031349223 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.27493733 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    m
  7. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  8. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.
  9. Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:52:50
  10. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.01
    0.0077601387 = product of:
      0.015520277 = sum of:
        0.015520277 = product of:
          0.031040555 = sum of:
            0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031040555 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  11. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: Webometrics : an introduction to the special issue (2004) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Thelwall, M.: Web impact factors and search engine coverage (2000) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=4539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Bookstein, A.; Moed, H.; Yitzahki, M.: Measures of international collaboration in scientific literature : part I (2006) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.01
    0.0062698447 = product of:
      0.012539689 = sum of:
        0.012539689 = product of:
          0.025079379 = sum of:
            0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025079379 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:54:22
  17. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.006208111 = product of:
      0.012416222 = sum of:
        0.012416222 = product of:
          0.024832444 = sum of:
            0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024832444 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  18. Sarabia, J.M.; Sarabia, M.: Explicit expressions for the Leimkuhler curve in parametric families (2008) 0.01
    0.0055418126 = product of:
      0.011083625 = sum of:
        0.011083625 = product of:
          0.02216725 = sum of:
            0.02216725 = weight(_text_:m in 2120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02216725 = score(doc=2120,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 2120, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we obtain the Leimkuhler curve in the case of some important statistical distributions proposed in the informetrics and econometrics literature. In this way, we complete the previous work of Burrell [Burrell, Q. L. (2005). Symmetry and other transformation features of Lorenz/Leimkuhler representations of informetric data. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1317-1329], where several open problems were stated. To do this, we use a recent and general definition of the Leimkuhler curve proposed by Sarabia [Sarabia, J. M. (2008a). A general definition of the Leimkuhler curve. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 156-163], and a new representation of the Leimkuhler curve in terms of the first-moment distribution of the population. Specifically, we obtain the Leimkuhler curve of the following distributions: classical and exponentiated Pareto distributions; three-parameter lognormal distribution; generalized gamma distribution, which includes to the exponential and classical gamma distributions among others; generalized beta distribution of the first kind and generalized beta distribution of the second kind, which includes as particular or limiting cases next important families like beta distribution of the second kind, Singh-Maddala, Dagum, Fisk or Lomax distributions. All the obtained Leimkuhler curves can be computed easily.
  19. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
  20. Thelwall, M.: Bibliometrics to webometrics (2009) 0.01
    0.005486114 = product of:
      0.010972228 = sum of:
        0.010972228 = product of:
          0.021944456 = sum of:
            0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 4239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021944456 = score(doc=4239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045820985 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 4239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Authors

Types

  • a 85
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications