Search (175 results, page 2 of 9)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ball, R.: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel : die Verwendung von Fragezeichen im Titel von wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenbeiträgen in der Medizin, den Lebenswissenschaften und in der Physik von 1966 bis 2005 (2007) 0.00
    0.004274019 = product of:
      0.04915122 = sum of:
        0.020021284 = weight(_text_:und in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020021284 = score(doc=635,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
        0.029129935 = weight(_text_:im in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029129935 = score(doc=635,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.4372462 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Die Titel wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen sind von besonderer Bedeutung. Wir haben fast 20 Millionen wissenschaftliche Artikel untersucht und den Anteil von Artikeln mit einem Fragezeichen am Ende des Titels im Laufe der letzten 40 Jahre analysiert. Unsere Studie beschränkte sich auf die Disziplinen Physik, Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Dabei haben wir eine deutliche Zunahme der Fragezeichen-Artikel von 50 Prozent auf mehr als 200 Prozent feststellten können. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden im vorliegenden Beitrag die grundsätzlichen Funktionen und Strukturen der Titel wissenschaftlicher Publikationen untersucht. Wir gehen davon aus, dass Marketing-Aspekte die entscheidenden Beweggründe sind für die zunehmende Nutzung von Fragezeichen-Titeln bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.6/7, S.371-375
  2. Bookstein, A.: Implications of ambiguity for scientometric measurement (2001) 0.00
    0.0042223274 = product of:
      0.048556764 = sum of:
        0.04227155 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04227155 = score(doc=5199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5199)
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 5199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=5199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 5199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.74-79
  3. Tsay, M.-y.: Literature growth, journal characteristics, and suthor productivity in subject indexing, 1977 to 2000 (2004) 0.00
    0.0033365337 = product of:
      0.038370136 = sum of:
        0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031703662 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
        0.0066664745 = product of:
          0.013332949 = sum of:
            0.013332949 = weight(_text_:1 in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013332949 = score(doc=2070,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    This study employed the Perl program, Excel software, and some bibliometric techniques to investigate growth pattern, journal characteristics, and author productivity of the subject indexing literature from 1977 to 2000, based an the subject search of a descriptor field in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database. The literature growth from 1977 to 2000 in subject indexing could be fitted well by the logistic curve. The Bradford plot of journal literature fits the typical Bradford-Zipf S-shaped curve. Twenty core journals making a significant contribution could be identified from the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Four major research topics in the area of subject indexing were identified as: (1) information organization, (2) information processing, (3) information storage and retrieval, and (4) information systems and services. It was also found that a vast majority of authors (76.7%) contributed only one article, which is a much larger percentage than the 60% of original Lotka's data. The 15 most productive authors and the key concepts of their research were identified.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.1, S.64-73
  4. Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002) 0.00
    0.002714016 = product of:
      0.031211182 = sum of:
        0.02396705 = sum of:
          0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007856515 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
          0.016110536 = weight(_text_:29 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016110536 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    1. 7.2005 12:10:16
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.00
    0.0025232534 = product of:
      0.029017413 = sum of:
        0.019438047 = product of:
          0.038876094 = sum of:
            0.038876094 = weight(_text_:international in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038876094 = score(doc=2761,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    International co-authorship relations and university-industry-government (Triple Helix) relations have hitherto been studied separately. Using Japanese publication data for the 1981-2004 period, we were able to study both kinds of relations in a single design. In the Japanese file, 1,277,030 articles with at least one Japanese address were attributed to the three sectors, and we know additionally whether these papers were coauthored internationally. Using the mutual information in three and four dimensions, respectively, we show that the Japanese Triple-Helix system has been continuously eroded at the national level. However, since the mid-1990s, international coauthorship relations have contributed to a reduction of the uncertainty at the national level. In other words, the national publication system of Japan has developed a capacity to retain surplus value generated internationally. In a final section, we compare these results with an analysis based on similar data for Canada. A relative uncoupling of national university-industry-government relations because of international collaborations is indicated in both countries.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  6. He, Z.-L.: International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority (2009) 0.00
    0.0025232534 = product of:
      0.029017413 = sum of:
        0.019438047 = product of:
          0.038876094 = sum of:
            0.038876094 = weight(_text_:international in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038876094 = score(doc=3122,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.49448338 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    The consistent finding that internationally coauthored papers are more heavily cited has led to a tacit agreement among politicians and scientists that international collaboration in scientific research should be particularly promoted. However, existing studies of research collaboration suffer from a major weakness in that the Thomson Reuters Web of Science until recently did not link author names with affiliation addresses. The general approach has been to hierarchically code papers into international paper, national paper, or local paper based on the address information. This hierarchical coding scheme severely understates the level and contribution of local or national collaboration on an internationally coauthored paper. In this research, I code collaboration variables by hand checking each paper in the sample, use two measures of a paper's impact, and try several regression models. I find that both international collaboration and local collaboration are positively and significantly associated with a paper's impact, but international collaboration does not have more epistemic authority than local collaboration. This result suggests that previous findings based on hierarchical coding might be misleading.
    Date
    26. 9.2009 11:22:05
  7. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.00
    0.001952461 = product of:
      0.0224533 = sum of:
        0.011277375 = product of:
          0.02255475 = sum of:
            0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02255475 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  8. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00
    0.0019020058 = product of:
      0.021873066 = sum of:
        0.0122937 = product of:
          0.0245874 = sum of:
            0.0245874 = weight(_text_:international in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0245874 = score(doc=201,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31273875 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  9. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.00
    0.0018378935 = product of:
      0.04227155 = sum of:
        0.04227155 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04227155 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  10. White, H.D.: Bibliometric overview of information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0018378935 = product of:
      0.04227155 = sum of:
        0.04227155 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04227155 = score(doc=3753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 3753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3753)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  11. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.00
    0.0016735381 = product of:
      0.019245688 = sum of:
        0.009666322 = product of:
          0.019332644 = sum of:
            0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019332644 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    17.12.2006 19:44:29
  12. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 0.00
    0.0016672731 = product of:
      0.03834728 = sum of:
        0.03834728 = sum of:
          0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012570425 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
          0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025776858 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2010 20:56:29
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.169-174
  13. Pulgarin, A.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature : 1956-2000 (2004) 0.00
    0.0016081568 = product of:
      0.036987606 = sum of:
        0.036987606 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036987606 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  14. Thelwall, M.; Li, X.; Barjak, F.; Robinson, S.: Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups (2008) 0.00
    0.001432649 = product of:
      0.016475463 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012547206 = product of:
          0.025094412 = sum of:
            0.025094412 = weight(_text_:international in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025094412 = score(doc=1401,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.31918767 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to claim that it is useful to assess the web connectivity of research groups, describe hyperlink-based techniques to achieve this and present brief details of European life sciences research groups as a case study. Design/methodology/approach - A commercial search engine was harnessed to deliver hyperlink data via its automatic query submission interface. A special purpose link analysis tool, LexiURL, then summarised and graphed the link data in appropriate ways. Findings - Webometrics can provide a wide range of descriptive information about the international connectivity of research groups. Research limitations/implications - Only one field was analysed, data was taken from only one search engine, and the results were not validated. Practical implications - Web connectivity seems to be particularly important for attracting overseas job applicants and to promote research achievements and capabilities, and hence we contend that it can be useful for national and international governments to use webometrics to ensure that the web is being used effectively by research groups. Originality/value - This is the first paper to make a case for the value of using a range of webometric techniques to evaluate the web presences of research groups within a field, and possibly the first "applied" webometrics study produced for an external contract.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 60(2008) no.1, S.18-31
  15. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Information science during the first decade of the web : an enriched author cocitation analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0013784202 = product of:
      0.031703662 = sum of:
        0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031703662 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  16. Chua, A.Y.K.; Yang, C.C.: ¬The shift towards multi-disciplinarity in information science (2008) 0.00
    0.0013784202 = product of:
      0.031703662 = sum of:
        0.031703662 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031703662 = score(doc=2389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10616633 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2389)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  17. Egghe, L.: Empirical and combinatorial study of country occurrences in multi-authored papers (2006) 0.00
    0.0012647192 = product of:
      0.01454427 = sum of:
        0.0051164515 = weight(_text_:und in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051164515 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=81,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Papers written by several authors can be classified according to the countries of the author affiliations. The empirical part of this paper consists of two datasets. One dataset consists of 1,035 papers retrieved via the search "pedagog*" in the years 2004 and 2005 (up to October) in Academic Search Elite which is a case where phi(m) = the number of papers with m =1, 2,3 ... authors is decreasing, hence most of the papers have a low number of authors. Here we find that #, m = the number of times a country occurs j times in a m-authored paper, j =1, ..., m-1 is decreasing and that # m, m is much higher than all the other #j, m values. The other dataset consists of 3,271 papers retrieved via the search "enzyme" in the year 2005 (up to October) in the same database which is a case of a non-decreasing phi(m): most papers have 3 or 4 authors and we even find many papers with a much higher number of authors. In this case we show again that # m, m is much higher than the other #j, m values but that #j, m is not decreasing anymore in j =1, ..., m-1, although #1, m is (apart from # m, m) the largest number amongst the #j,m. The combinatorial part gives a proof of the fact that #j,m decreases for j = 1, m-1, supposing that all cases are equally possible. This shows that the first dataset is more conform with this model than the second dataset. Explanations for these findings are given. From the data we also find the (we think: new) distribution of number of papers with n =1, 2,3,... countries (i.e. where there are n different countries involved amongst the m (a n) authors of a paper): a fast decreasing function e.g. as a power law with a very large Lotka exponent.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.427-432
  18. Egghe, L.: ¬A noninformetric analysis of the relationship between citation age and journal productivity (2001) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    A problem, raised by Wallace (JASIS, 37,136-145,1986), on the relation between the journal's median citation age and its number of articles is studied. Leaving open the problem as such, we give a statistical explanation of this relationship, when replacing "median" by "mean" in Wallace's problem. The cloud of points, found by Wallace, is explained in this sense that the points are scattered over the area in first quadrant, limited by a curve of the form y=1 + E/x**2 where E is a constant. This curve is obtained by using the Central Limit Theorem in statistics and, hence, has no intrinsic informetric foundation. The article closes with some reflections on explanations of regularities in informetrics, based on statistical, probabilistic or informetric results, or on a combination thereof
    Date
    29. 9.2001 13:59:34
  19. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:09
  20. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:29:08
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.58-62

Authors

Types

  • a 171
  • m 3
  • el 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications