-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.03
0.025327213 = product of:
0.050654426 = sum of:
0.050654426 = sum of:
0.02599572 = weight(_text_:p in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02599572 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.024658704 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658704 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024658704 = product of:
0.04931741 = sum of:
0.04931741 = product of:
0.09863482 = sum of:
0.09863482 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09863482 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02179542 = product of:
0.04359084 = sum of:
0.04359084 = product of:
0.08718168 = sum of:
0.08718168 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08718168 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.02
0.018494027 = product of:
0.036988053 = sum of:
0.036988053 = product of:
0.07397611 = sum of:
0.07397611 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07397611 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Kretschmer, H.; Kretschmer, T.: Well-ordered collaboration structures of co-author pairs in journals (2006)
0.02
0.016247325 = product of:
0.03249465 = sum of:
0.03249465 = product of:
0.0649893 = sum of:
0.0649893 = weight(_text_:p in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0649893 = score(doc=25,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In single-authored bibliographies only single scientist distribution can be found. But in multi-authored bibliographies single scientists distribution, pairs distribution, triples distribution, etc., can be presented. Whereas regarding Lotka's law single scientists P distribution (both in single-authored and in multi-authored bibliographies) is of interest, in the future pairs P, Q distribution, triples P, Q, R distribution, etc. should be considered Starting with pair distribution, the following question arises in the present paper: Is there also any regularity or well-ordered structure for the distribution of coauthor pairs in journals in analogy to Lotka's law for the distribution of single authors? Usually, in information science "laws " or "regularities " (for example Lotka's law) are mathematical descriptions of observed data inform of functions; however explanations of these phenomena are mostly missing. By contrast, in this paper the derivation of a formula for describing the distribution of the number of co-author pairs will be presented based on wellknown regularities in socio psychology or sociology in conjunction with the Gestalt theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of scientific literature, as well as derivations from Lotka's law. The assumed regularities for the distribution of co-author pairs in journals could be shown in the co-authorship data (1980-1998) of the journals Science, Nature, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA and Phys Rev B Condensed Matter.
- Source
- Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
-
Jepsen, E.T.; Seiden, P.; Ingwersen, P.; Björneborn, L.; Borlund, P.: Characteristics of scientific Web publications : preliminary data gathering and analysis (2004)
0.01
0.014070597 = product of:
0.028141193 = sum of:
0.028141193 = product of:
0.056282386 = sum of:
0.056282386 = weight(_text_:p in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056282386 = score(doc=3091,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.34403014 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.0130772535 = product of:
0.026154507 = sum of:
0.026154507 = product of:
0.052309014 = sum of:
0.052309014 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052309014 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.0130772535 = product of:
0.026154507 = sum of:
0.026154507 = product of:
0.052309014 = sum of:
0.052309014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052309014 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.012329352 = product of:
0.024658704 = sum of:
0.024658704 = product of:
0.04931741 = sum of:
0.04931741 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04931741 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Björneborn, L.; Ingwersen, P.: Toward a basic framework for Webometrics (2004)
0.01
0.011373127 = product of:
0.022746254 = sum of:
0.022746254 = product of:
0.045492508 = sum of:
0.045492508 = weight(_text_:p in 3088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492508 = score(doc=3088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gaulé, P.: Access to scientific literature in India (2009)
0.01
0.011373127 = product of:
0.022746254 = sum of:
0.022746254 = product of:
0.045492508 = sum of:
0.045492508 = weight(_text_:p in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045492508 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.01089771 = product of:
0.02179542 = sum of:
0.02179542 = product of:
0.04359084 = sum of:
0.04359084 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04359084 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.010788183 = product of:
0.021576365 = sum of:
0.021576365 = product of:
0.04315273 = sum of:
0.04315273 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04315273 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15933464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Alvarez, P.; Escalona, I.; Pulgarin, A.: What is wrong with obsolescence? (2000)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri : methodical considerations (2004)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=4423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Newby, G.B.; Greenberg, J.; Jones, P.: Open source software development and Lotka's law : bibliometric patterns in programming (2003)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Vinkler, P.: ¬The institutionalization of scientific information : a scientometric model (ISI-S Model) (2002)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=817,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhou, P.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬A comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and interjournal citation relations (2007)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=70,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Vakkari, P.: Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity (2008)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 1380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=1380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Katsaros, D.; Akritidis, L.; Bozanis, P.: ¬The f index : quantifying the impact of coterminal citations on scientists' ranking (2009)
0.01
0.009748395 = product of:
0.01949679 = sum of:
0.01949679 = product of:
0.03899358 = sum of:
0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03899358 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.045500398 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
