-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.04
0.040329076 = product of:
0.08065815 = sum of:
0.08065815 = sum of:
0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043731 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Glänzel, W.; Moed, H.F.: Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002)
0.03
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = product of:
0.102039 = sum of:
0.102039 = weight(_text_:w in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102039 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.58945394 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024618102 = product of:
0.049236204 = sum of:
0.049236204 = product of:
0.09847241 = sum of:
0.09847241 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09847241 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.021759534 = product of:
0.04351907 = sum of:
0.04351907 = product of:
0.08703814 = sum of:
0.08703814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08703814 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)
0.02
0.02037198 = product of:
0.04074396 = sum of:
0.04074396 = product of:
0.08148792 = sum of:
0.08148792 = weight(_text_:w in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08148792 = score(doc=5586,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.4707354 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the practical limitations in the content and software of the databases that are used to calculate the h-index for assessing the publishing productivity and impact of researchers. To celebrate F. W. Lancaster's biological age of seventy-five, and "scientific age" of forty-five, this paper discusses the related features of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS), and demonstrates in the latter how a much more realistic and fair h-index can be computed for F. W. Lancaster than the one produced automatically. Browsing and searching the cited reference index of the 1945-2007 edition of WoS, which in my estimate has over a hundred million "orphan references" that have no counterpart master records to be attached to, and "stray references" that cite papers which do have master records but cannot be identified by the matching algorithm because of errors of omission and commission in the references of the citing works, can bring up hundreds of additional cited references given to works of an accomplished author but are ignored in the automatic process of calculating the h-index. The partially manual process doubled the h-index value for F. W. Lancaster from 13 to 26, which is a much more realistic value for an information scientist and professor of his stature.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.02
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = product of:
0.073854305 = sum of:
0.073854305 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073854305 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Harzing, A.-W.; Wal, R. van der: ¬A Google Scholar h-index for journals : an alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business (2009)
0.01
0.014577001 = product of:
0.029154003 = sum of:
0.029154003 = product of:
0.058308005 = sum of:
0.058308005 = weight(_text_:w in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058308005 = score(doc=2630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.33683082 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.013055721 = product of:
0.026111443 = sum of:
0.026111443 = product of:
0.052222885 = sum of:
0.052222885 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052222885 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013055721 = product of:
0.026111443 = sum of:
0.026111443 = product of:
0.052222885 = sum of:
0.052222885 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052222885 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Glänzel, W.: Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998) : a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies (2002)
0.01
0.012754875 = product of:
0.02550975 = sum of:
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0510195 = score(doc=810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008)
0.01
0.012754875 = product of:
0.02550975 = sum of:
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0510195 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Fundamental mathematical properties of rhythm sequences are studied. In particular, a set of three axioms for valid rhythm indicators is proposed, and it is shown that the R-indicator satisfies only two out of three but that the R-indicator satisfies all three. This fills a critical, logical gap in the study of these indicator sequences. Matrices leading to a constant R-sequence are called baseline matrices. They are characterized as matrices with constant w-year diachronous impact factors. The relation with classical impact factors is clarified. Using regression analysis matrices with a rhythm sequence that is on average equal to 1 (smaller than 1, larger than 1) are characterized.
-
Harzing, A.-W.: Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI Journal Impact Factor (2008)
0.01
0.012754875 = product of:
0.02550975 = sum of:
0.02550975 = product of:
0.0510195 = sum of:
0.0510195 = weight(_text_:w in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0510195 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.29472697 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.012309051 = product of:
0.024618102 = sum of:
0.024618102 = product of:
0.049236204 = sum of:
0.049236204 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049236204 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Koehler, W.: Web page change and persistence : a four-year longitudinal study (2002)
0.01
0.01093275 = product of:
0.0218655 = sum of:
0.0218655 = product of:
0.043731 = sum of:
0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043731 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Samoylenko, I.; Chao, T.-C.; Liu, W.-C.; Chen, C.-M.: Visualizing the scientific world and its evolution (2006)
0.01
0.01093275 = product of:
0.0218655 = sum of:
0.0218655 = product of:
0.043731 = sum of:
0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043731 = score(doc=5911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Janssens, F.; Leta, J.; Glänzel, W.; Moor, B. de: Towards mapping library and information science (2006)
0.01
0.01093275 = product of:
0.0218655 = sum of:
0.0218655 = product of:
0.043731 = sum of:
0.043731 = weight(_text_:w in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043731 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.010879767 = product of:
0.021759534 = sum of:
0.021759534 = product of:
0.04351907 = sum of:
0.04351907 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04351907 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.01077042 = product of:
0.02154084 = sum of:
0.02154084 = product of:
0.04308168 = sum of:
0.04308168 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04308168 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Neuhaus, C.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-W.: ¬The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts : a case study on the limitations of the Journal Impact Factor (2009)
0.01
0.010307496 = product of:
0.020614993 = sum of:
0.020614993 = product of:
0.041229986 = sum of:
0.041229986 = weight(_text_:w in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041229986 = score(doc=2707,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17310768 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23817536 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.01
0.009231788 = product of:
0.018463576 = sum of:
0.018463576 = product of:
0.036927152 = sum of:
0.036927152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036927152 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1590723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045425482 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
