Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Perer, A.; Shneiderman, B.; Oard, D.W.: Using rhythms of relationships to understand e-mail archives (2006) 0.05
    0.054742485 = product of:
      0.27371243 = sum of:
        0.27371243 = weight(_text_:mail in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27371243 = score(doc=207,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.972764 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Due to e-mail's ubiquitous nature, millions of users are intimate with the technology; however, most users are only familiar with managing their own e-mail, which is an inherently different task from exploring an e-mail archive. Historians and social scientists believe that e-mail archives are important artifacts for understanding the individuals and communities they represent. To understand the conversations evidenced in an archive, context is needed. In this article, we present a new way to gain this necessary context: analyzing the temporal rhythms of social relationships. We provide methods for constructing meaningful rhythms from the e-mail headers by identifying relationships and interpreting their attributes. With these visualization techniques, e-mail archive explorers can uncover insights that may have been otherwise hidden in the archive. We apply our methods to an individual's 15-year e-mail archive, which consists of about 45,000 messages and over 4,000 relationships.
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.0219953 = product of:
      0.1099765 = sum of:
        0.1099765 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1099765 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Belefant-Miller, H.; King, D.W.: ¬A profile of faculty reading and information-use behaviors on the cusp of the electronic age (2003) 0.02
    0.020690711 = product of:
      0.103453554 = sum of:
        0.103453554 = weight(_text_:mail in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103453554 = score(doc=5153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.36767018 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Finally Belefant-Miller and King analyze the demographic portion of a survey of faculty and staff at the University of Tennessee to determine reading and information use behavior. Faculty each read an average 384 documents per year for their work including an average 161 journal articles. They funded 84% of their own subscriptions, and averaged 4.2 subscriptions per person. Personal computer access was available to 91.5% and 95% made some use of it. About half access e-mail more than once a day spending an average 24 minutes a day. Browsing remains a very important means of document discovery despite the use of universal bibliographic databases. Paper remains the preferred reading interface, with electronic reading about one quarter of paper readings. Self reported publication rates were 3 journal articles per year.
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.019441282 = product of:
      0.09720641 = sum of:
        0.09720641 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09720641 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.016496474 = product of:
      0.08248237 = sum of:
        0.08248237 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08248237 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  6. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01
    0.01166477 = product of:
      0.05832385 = sum of:
        0.05832385 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05832385 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  7. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.01166477 = product of:
      0.05832385 = sum of:
        0.05832385 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05832385 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  8. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.01
    0.01099765 = product of:
      0.05498825 = sum of:
        0.05498825 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05498825 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  9. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.01
    0.009720641 = product of:
      0.048603203 = sum of:
        0.048603203 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048603203 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  10. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01
    0.009622944 = product of:
      0.048114717 = sum of:
        0.048114717 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048114717 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  11. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  12. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  13. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  15. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  16. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
  17. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  18. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
  19. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
  20. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.01
    0.008248237 = product of:
      0.041241184 = sum of:
        0.041241184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041241184 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050732337 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20