-
Lawrence, S.: Online or Invisible? (2001)
0.02
0.023206295 = product of:
0.09282518 = sum of:
0.09282518 = sum of:
0.04934673 = weight(_text_:online in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04934673 = score(doc=1063,freq=18.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347845 = score(doc=1063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Articles freely available online are more highly cited. For greater impact and faster scientific progress, authors and publishers should aim to make research easy to access.
- Content
- The volume of scientific literature typically far exceeds the ability of scientists to identify and utilize all relevant information in their research. Improvements to the accessibility of scientific literature, allowing scientists to locate more relevant research within a given time, have the potential to dramatically improve communication and progress in science. With the web, scientists now have very convenient access to an increasing amount of literature that previously required trips to the library, inter-library loan delays, or substantial effort in locating the source. Evidence shows that usage increases when access is more convenient, and maximizing the usage of the scientific record benefits all of society. Although availability varies greatly by discipline, over a million research articles are freely available on the web. Some journals and conferences provide free access online, others allow authors to post articles on the web, and others allow authors to purchase the right to post their articles on the web. In this article we investigate the impact of free online availability by analyzing citation rates. We do not discuss methods of creating free online availability, such as time-delayed release or publication/membership/conference charges. Online availability of an article may not be expected to greatly improve access and impact by itself. For example, efficient means of locating articles via web search engines or specialized search services is required, and a substantial percentage of the literature needs to be indexed by these search services before it is worthwhile for many scientists to use them. Computer science is a forerunner in web availability -- a substantial percentage of the literature is online and available through search engines such as Google (google.com), or specialized services such as ResearchIndex (researchindex.org). Even so, the greatest impact of the online availability of computer science literature is likely yet to come, because comprehensive search services and more powerful search methods have only become available recently. We analyzed 119,924 conference articles in computer science and related disciplines, obtained from DBLP (dblp.uni-trier.de). In computer science, conference articles are typically formal publications and are often more prestigious than journal articles, with acceptance rates at some conferences below 10%. Citation counts and online availability were estimated using ResearchIndex. The analysis excludes self-citations, where a citation is considered to be a self-citation if one or more of the citing and cited authors match.
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Sotudeh, H.; Horri, A.: ¬The citation performance of open access journals : a disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models (2007)
0.02
0.01630442 = product of:
0.06521768 = sum of:
0.06521768 = product of:
0.13043536 = sum of:
0.13043536 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13043536 = score(doc=4479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.6541831 = fieldWeight in 4479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.02
0.015590616 = product of:
0.031181231 = sum of:
0.01644891 = product of:
0.03289782 = sum of:
0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03289782 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013911052 = product of:
0.027822103 = sum of:
0.0123366825 = product of:
0.024673365 = sum of:
0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024673365 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015485421 = product of:
0.046456262 = sum of:
0.046456262 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456262 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.012832801 = product of:
0.051331203 = sum of:
0.051331203 = product of:
0.0769968 = sum of:
0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038672343 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832446 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.01
0.010999544 = product of:
0.043998174 = sum of:
0.043998174 = product of:
0.06599726 = sum of:
0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033147726 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032849535 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
17.12.2006 19:44:29
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.01
0.009510912 = product of:
0.038043648 = sum of:
0.038043648 = product of:
0.076087296 = sum of:
0.076087296 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076087296 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.38160682 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Frandsen, T.F.: ¬The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system : three science fields (2009)
0.01
0.00815221 = product of:
0.03260884 = sum of:
0.03260884 = product of:
0.06521768 = sum of:
0.06521768 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06521768 = score(doc=4210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.32709154 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
McDonald, J.D.: Understanding journal usage : a statistical analysis of citation and use (2007)
0.01
0.0075546447 = product of:
0.030218579 = sum of:
0.030218579 = product of:
0.060437158 = sum of:
0.060437158 = weight(_text_:online in 83) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060437158 = score(doc=83,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.49280655 = fieldWeight in 83, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=83)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This study examined the relationship between print journal use, online journal use, and online journal discovery tools with local journal citations. Local use measures were collected from 1997 to 2004, and negative binomial regression models were designed to test the effect that local use, online availability, and access enhancements have on citation behaviors of academic research authors. Models are proposed and tested to determine whether multiple locally recorded usage measures can predict citations and if locally controlled access enhancements influence citation. The regression results indicated that print journal use was a significant predictor of local journal citations prior to the adoption of online journals. Publisher-provided and locally recorded online journal use measures were also significant predictors of local citations. Online availability of a journal was found to significantly increase local citations, and, for some disciplines, a new access tool like an OpenURL resolver significantly impacts citations and publisherprovided journal usage measures.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0072998973 = product of:
0.029199589 = sum of:
0.029199589 = product of:
0.08759876 = sum of:
0.08759876 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08759876 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? : an analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals (2008)
0.01
0.0067999572 = product of:
0.027199829 = sum of:
0.027199829 = product of:
0.054399658 = sum of:
0.054399658 = weight(_text_:online in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054399658 = score(doc=1614,freq=14.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.4435766 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Open-access online publication has made available an increasingly wide range of document types for scientometric analysis. In this article, we focus on citations in online presentations, seeking evidence of their value as nontraditional indicators of research impact. For this purpose, we searched for online PowerPoint files mentioning any one of 1,807 ISI-indexed journals in ten science and ten social science disciplines. We also manually classified 1,378 online PowerPoint citations to journals in eight additional science and social science disciplines. The results showed that very few journals were cited frequently enough in online PowerPoint files to make impact assessment worthwhile, with the main exceptions being popular magazines like Scientific American and Harvard Business Review. Surprisingly, however, there was little difference overall in the number of PowerPoint citations to science and to the social sciences, and also in the proportion representing traditional impact (about 60%) and wider impact (about 15%). It seems that the main scientometric value for online presentations may be in tracking the popularization of research, or for comparing the impact of whole journals rather than individual articles.
-
Moed, H.F.: ¬The effect of "open access" on citation impact : an analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section (2007)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The effect of open access on citation impact : a comparison study based on Web citation analysis (2006)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 5071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=5071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 5071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.006452258 = product of:
0.025809033 = sum of:
0.025809033 = product of:
0.0774271 = sum of:
0.0774271 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774271 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: Do the Web Sites of Higher Rated Scholars Have Significantly More Online Impact? (2004)
0.01
0.0057470133 = product of:
0.022988053 = sum of:
0.022988053 = product of:
0.045976106 = sum of:
0.045976106 = weight(_text_:online in 2123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045976106 = score(doc=2123,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.37489069 = fieldWeight in 2123, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2123)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The quality and impact of academic Web sites is of interest to many audiences, including the scholars who use them and Web educators who need to identify best practice. Several large-scale European Union research projects have been funded to build new indicators for online scientific activity, reflecting recognition of the importance of the Web for scholarly communication. In this paper we address the key question of whether higher rated scholars produce higher impact Web sites, using the United Kingdom as a case study and measuring scholars' quality in terms of university-wide average research ratings. Methodological issues concerning the measurement of the online impact are discussed, leading to the adoption of counts of links to a university's constituent single domain Web sites from an aggregated counting metric. The findings suggest that universities with higher rated scholars produce significantly more Web content but with a similar average online impact. Higher rated scholars therefore attract more total links from their peers, but only by being more prolific, refuting earlier suggestions. It can be surmised that general Web publications are very different from scholarly journal articles and conference papers, for which scholarly quality does associate with citation impact. This has important implications for the construction of new Web indicators, for example that online impact should not be used to assess the quality of small groups of scholars, even within a single discipline.
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.01
0.0054749227 = product of:
0.02189969 = sum of:
0.02189969 = product of:
0.06569907 = sum of:
0.06569907 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06569907 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Coleman, A.: Instruments of cognition : use of citations and Web links in online teaching materials (2005)
0.01
0.005088622 = product of:
0.020354489 = sum of:
0.020354489 = product of:
0.040708978 = sum of:
0.040708978 = weight(_text_:online in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040708978 = score(doc=3329,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Use of citations and Web links embedded in online teaching materials was studied for an undergraduate course. The undergraduate students enrolled in Geographic Information Science for Geography and Regional Development used Web links more often than citations, but clearly did not see them as key to enhancing learning. Current conventions for citing and linking tend to make citations and links invisible. There is some evidence that citations and Web links categorized and highlighted in terms of their importance and function to be served may help student learning in interdisciplinary domains.
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.00
0.004361676 = product of:
0.017446704 = sum of:
0.017446704 = product of:
0.03489341 = sum of:
0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489341 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Thelwall, M.: Webometrics (2009)
0.00
0.004361676 = product of:
0.017446704 = sum of:
0.017446704 = product of:
0.03489341 = sum of:
0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489341 = score(doc=3906,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Webometrics is an information science field concerned with measuring aspects of the World Wide Web (WWW) for a variety of information science research goals. It came into existence about five years after the Web was formed and has since grown to become a significant aspect of information science, at least in terms of published research. Although some webometrics research has focused on the structure or evolution of the Web itself or the performance of commercial search engines, most has used data from the Web to shed light on information provision or online communication in various contexts. Most prominently, techniques have been developed to track, map, and assess Web-based informal scholarly communication, for example, in terms of the hyperlinks between academic Web sites or the online impact of digital repositories. In addition, a range of nonacademic issues and groups of Web users have also been analyzed.
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.00
0.0038713552 = product of:
0.015485421 = sum of:
0.015485421 = product of:
0.046456262 = sum of:
0.046456262 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456262 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
