-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: How quickly do publications get read? : the evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles (2018)
0.02
0.020856475 = product of:
0.0834259 = sum of:
0.0834259 = sum of:
0.029077841 = weight(_text_:online in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029077841 = score(doc=4015,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Within science, citation counts are widely used to estimate research impact but publication delays mean that they are not useful for recent research. This gap can be filled by Mendeley reader counts, which are valuable early impact indicators for academic articles because they appear before citations and correlate strongly with them. Nevertheless, it is not known how Mendeley readership counts accumulate within the year of publication, and so it is unclear how soon they can be used. In response, this paper reports a longitudinal weekly study of the Mendeley readers of articles in 6 library and information science journals from 2016. The results suggest that Mendeley readers accrue from when articles are first available online and continue to steadily build. For journals with large publication delays, articles can already have substantial numbers of readers by their publication date. Thus, Mendeley reader counts may even be useful as early impact indicators for articles before they have been officially published in a journal issue. If field normalized indicators are needed, then these can be generated when journal issues are published using the online first date.
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.02
0.01814945 = product of:
0.0362989 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.02
0.01814945 = product of:
0.0362989 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.02
0.01814945 = product of:
0.0362989 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.01
0.014666058 = product of:
0.058664232 = sum of:
0.058664232 = product of:
0.08799635 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04379938 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.01
0.014519561 = product of:
0.029039122 = sum of:
0.021739226 = product of:
0.04347845 = sum of:
0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347845 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0072998973 = product of:
0.02189969 = sum of:
0.02189969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02189969 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.01
0.010999544 = product of:
0.043998174 = sum of:
0.043998174 = product of:
0.06599726 = sum of:
0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033147726 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032849535 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.00970272 = product of:
0.01940544 = sum of:
0.010280568 = product of:
0.020561136 = sum of:
0.020561136 = weight(_text_:online in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020561136 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics-Why should one use the mean and not the median?-and the incomparability among fields of science because of systematic differences in citation behavior among fields. Can these drawbacks be counteracted by fractionally counting citation weights instead of using whole numbers in the numerators? (a) Fractional citation counts are normalized in terms of the citing sources and thus would take into account differences in citation behavior among fields of science. (b) Differences in the resulting distributions can be tested statistically for their significance at different levels of aggregation. (c) Fractional counting can be generalized to any document set including journals or groups of journals, and thus the significance of differences among both small and large sets can be tested. A list of fractionally counted IFs for 2008 is available online at http:www.leydesdorff.net/weighted_if/weighted_if.xls The between-group variance among the 13 fields of science identified in the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators is no longer statistically significant after this normalization. Although citation behavior differs largely between disciplines, the reflection of these differences in fractionally counted citation distributions can not be used as a reliable instrument for the classification.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Dalen, H.P. van; Henkens, K.: Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture : a worldwide survey (2012)
0.01
0.00815221 = product of:
0.03260884 = sum of:
0.03260884 = product of:
0.06521768 = sum of:
0.06521768 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06521768 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.32709154 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Lozano, G.A.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends : a professional site with academic and educational uses (2017)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Zahedi, Z.; Costas, R.; Wouters, P.: Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications (2017)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Abad-García, M.-F.; González-Teruel, A.; González-Llinares, J.: Effectiveness of OpenAIRE, BASE, Recolecta, and Google Scholar at finding spanish articles in repositories (2018)
0.01
0.006793508 = product of:
0.027174031 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.01
0.005821632 = product of:
0.011643264 = sum of:
0.0061683413 = product of:
0.0123366825 = sum of:
0.0123366825 = weight(_text_:online in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0123366825 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.100593716 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0054749227 = product of:
0.016424768 = sum of:
0.016424768 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016424768 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Furthermore, the rise of the web, and subsequently, the social web, has challenged the quasi-monopolistic status of the journal as the main form of scholarly communication and citation indices as the primary assessment mechanisms. Scientific communication is becoming more open, transparent, and diverse: publications are increasingly open access; manuscripts, presentations, code, and data are shared online; research ideas and results are discussed and criticized openly on blogs; and new peer review experiments, with open post publication assessment by anonymous or non-anonymous referees, are underway. The diversification of scholarly production and assessment, paired with the increasing speed of the communication process, leads to an increased information overload (Bawden and Robinson, 2008), demanding new filters. The concept of altmetrics, short for alternative (to citation) metrics, was created out of an attempt to provide a filter (Priem et al., 2010) and to steer against the oversimplification of the measurement of scientific success solely on the basis of number of journal articles published and citations received, by considering a wider range of research outputs and metrics (Piwowar, 2013). Although the term altmetrics was introduced in a tweet in 2010 (Priem, 2010), the idea of capturing traces - "polymorphous mentioning" (Cronin et al., 1998, p. 1320) - of scholars and their documents on the web to measure "impact" of science in a broader manner than citations was introduced years before, largely in the context of webometrics (Almind and Ingwersen, 1997; Thelwall et al., 2005):
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Prathap, G.: Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators (2014)
0.01
0.0055246213 = product of:
0.022098485 = sum of:
0.022098485 = product of:
0.06629545 = sum of:
0.06629545 = weight(_text_:29 in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06629545 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 15:59:59
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
0.01
0.0055246213 = product of:
0.022098485 = sum of:
0.022098485 = product of:
0.06629545 = sum of:
0.06629545 = weight(_text_:29 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06629545 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:55:03
-
Zornic, N.; Markovic, A.; Jeremic, V.: How the top 500 ARWU can provide a misleading rank (2014)
0.01
0.0055246213 = product of:
0.022098485 = sum of:
0.022098485 = product of:
0.06629545 = sum of:
0.06629545 = weight(_text_:29 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06629545 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16. 6.2014 19:29:15
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.01
0.0054749227 = product of:
0.02189969 = sum of:
0.02189969 = product of:
0.06569907 = sum of:
0.06569907 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06569907 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Nelson, G.M.; Eggett, D.L.: Citations, mandates, and money : author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals (2017)
0.01
0.0054348065 = product of:
0.021739226 = sum of:
0.021739226 = product of:
0.04347845 = sum of:
0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347845 = score(doc=3838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
