-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.018675037 = product of:
0.037350073 = sum of:
0.037350073 = product of:
0.07470015 = sum of:
0.07470015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07470015 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Tonta, Y.; Ünal, Y.: Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests (2005)
0.02
0.016114645 = product of:
0.03222929 = sum of:
0.03222929 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.024900049 = weight(_text_:22 in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024900049 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper we investigate the scattering of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in more than 137,000 document delivery requests submitted to a national document delivery service. We first summarize the major findings of the study with regards to the performance of the service. We then identify the "core" journals from which article requests were satisfied and address the following research questions: (a) Does the distribution of (core) journals conform to the Bradford's Law of Scattering? (b) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and impact factors, journals with high impact factors being used more often than the rest? (c) Is there a relationship between usage of journals and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being used more often than the rest? (d) What is the median age of use (half-life) of requested articles in general? (e) Do requested articles that appear in core journals get obsolete more slowly? (f) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and journal impact factors, journals with high impact factors being obsolete more slowly? (g) Is there a relationship between obsolescence and total citation counts, journals with high total citation counts being obsolete more slowly? Based an the analysis of findings, we found that the distribution of highly and moderately used journal titles conform to Bradford's Law. The median age of use was 8 years for all requested articles. Ninety percent of the articles requested were 21 years of age or younger. Articles that appeared in 168 core journal titles seem to get obsolete slightly more slowly than those of all titles. We observed no statistically significant correlations between the frequency of journal use and ISI journal impact factors, and between the frequency of journal use and ISI- (Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA) cited half-lives for the most heavily used 168 core journal titles. There was a weak correlation between usage of journals and ISI-reported total citation counts. No statistically significant relationship was found between median age of use and journal impact factors and between median age of use and total citation counts. There was a weak negative correlation between ISI journal impact factors and cited half-lives of 168 core journals, and a weak correlation between ISI citation halflives and use half-lives of core journals. No correlation was found between cited half-lives of 168 core journals and their corresponding total citation counts as reported by ISI. Findings of the current study are discussed along with those of other studies.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 10:54:22
-
Torres-Salinas, D.; Gorraiz, J.; Robinson-Garcia, N.: ¬The insoluble problems of books : what does Altmetric.com have to offer? (2018)
0.02
0.016114645 = product of:
0.03222929 = sum of:
0.03222929 = sum of:
0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073292386 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.024900049 = weight(_text_:22 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024900049 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.013205246 = product of:
0.026410492 = sum of:
0.026410492 = product of:
0.052820984 = sum of:
0.052820984 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052820984 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013205246 = product of:
0.026410492 = sum of:
0.026410492 = product of:
0.052820984 = sum of:
0.052820984 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052820984 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
-
Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:12:28
-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.01
0.0124500245 = product of:
0.024900049 = sum of:
0.024900049 = product of:
0.049800098 = sum of:
0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049800098 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.01
0.011004371 = product of:
0.022008741 = sum of:
0.022008741 = product of:
0.044017483 = sum of:
0.044017483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044017483 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.011004371 = product of:
0.022008741 = sum of:
0.022008741 = product of:
0.044017483 = sum of:
0.044017483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044017483 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)
0.01
0.011004371 = product of:
0.022008741 = sum of:
0.022008741 = product of:
0.044017483 = sum of:
0.044017483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044017483 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
-
Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014)
0.01
0.011004371 = product of:
0.022008741 = sum of:
0.022008741 = product of:
0.044017483 = sum of:
0.044017483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044017483 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.10.2014 20:22:22
-
Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015)
0.01
0.011004371 = product of:
0.022008741 = sum of:
0.022008741 = product of:
0.044017483 = sum of:
0.044017483 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044017483 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
17. 9.2018 18:22:23
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.01
0.010893771 = product of:
0.021787543 = sum of:
0.021787543 = product of:
0.043575086 = sum of:
0.043575086 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043575086 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045945734 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
