-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.08
0.07710219 = product of:
0.12850365 = sum of:
0.02402638 = weight(_text_:information in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02402638 = score(doc=1515,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.024222054 = weight(_text_:und in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024222054 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.080255225 = product of:
0.16051045 = sum of:
0.16051045 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16051045 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25721565 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.62403065 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Classification
- AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
- COMPASS
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
- LCSH
- Information science / Statistical methods
- RVK
- AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
- Subject
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
Information science / Statistical methods
-
Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014)
0.08
0.076902285 = product of:
0.09612785 = sum of:
0.016989218 = weight(_text_:information in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016989218 = score(doc=2274,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.21466857 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.012111027 = weight(_text_:und in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012111027 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.12120757 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.026899999 = product of:
0.053799998 = sum of:
0.053799998 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053799998 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21059684 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.2554644 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.040127613 = product of:
0.080255225 = sum of:
0.080255225 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080255225 = score(doc=2274,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25721565 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.31201532 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(4/5)
- Abstract
- This is a practical guide to using web metrics to measure impact and demonstrate value. The web provides an opportunity to collect a host of different metrics, from those associated with social media accounts and websites to more traditional research outputs. This book is a clear guide for library and information professionals as to what web metrics are available and how to assess and use them to make informed decisions and demonstrate value. As individuals and organizations increasingly use the web in addition to traditional publishing avenues and formats, this book provides the tools to unlock web metrics and evaluate the impact of this content. The key topics covered include: bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics; data collection tools; evaluating impact on the web; evaluating social media impact; investigating relationships between actors; exploring traditional publications in a new environment; web metrics and the web of data; the future of web metrics and the library and information professional. The book will provide a practical introduction to web metrics for a wide range of library and information professionals, from the bibliometrician wanting to demonstrate the wider impact of a researcher's work than can be demonstrated through traditional citations databases, to the reference librarian wanting to measure how successfully they are engaging with their users on Twitter. It will be a valuable tool for anyone who wants to not only understand the impact of content, but demonstrate this impact to others within the organization and beyond.
- BK
- 06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
- Classification
- 06.00 Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
- Content
- 1. Introduction. MetricsIndicators -- Web metrics and Ranganathan's laws of library science -- Web metrics for the library and information professional -- The aim of this book -- The structure of the rest of this book -- 2. Bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics. Web metrics -- Information science metrics -- Web analytics -- Relational and evaluative metrics -- Evaluative web metrics -- Relational web metrics -- Validating the results -- 3. Data collection tools. The anatomy of a URL, web links and the structure of the web -- Search engines 1.0 -- Web crawlers -- Search engines 2.0 -- Post search engine 2.0: fragmentation -- 4. Evaluating impact on the web. Websites -- Blogs -- Wikis -- Internal metrics -- External metrics -- A systematic approach to content analysis -- 5. Evaluating social media impact. Aspects of social network sites -- Typology of social network sites -- Research and tools for specific sites and services -- Other social network sites -- URL shorteners: web analytic links on any site -- General social media impact -- Sentiment analysis -- 6. Investigating relationships between actors. Social network analysis methods -- Sources for relational network analysis -- 7. Exploring traditional publications in a new environment. More bibliographic items -- Full text analysis -- Greater context -- 8. Web metrics and the web of data. The web of data -- Building the semantic web -- Implications of the web of data for web metrics -- Investigating the web of data today -- SPARQL -- Sindice -- LDSpider: an RDF web crawler -- 9. The future of web metrics and the library and information professional. How far we have come -- The future of web metrics -- The future of the library and information professional and web metrics.
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.03
0.02936978 = product of:
0.07342445 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.048864625 = product of:
0.09772925 = sum of:
0.09772925 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09772925 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.02936978 = product of:
0.07342445 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.048864625 = product of:
0.09772925 = sum of:
0.09772925 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09772925 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.03
0.02936978 = product of:
0.07342445 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.048864625 = product of:
0.09772925 = sum of:
0.09772925 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09772925 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.03
0.025698557 = product of:
0.064246394 = sum of:
0.02148985 = weight(_text_:information in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02148985 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.042756546 = product of:
0.08551309 = sum of:
0.08551309 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08551309 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.03
0.025698557 = product of:
0.064246394 = sum of:
0.02148985 = weight(_text_:information in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02148985 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.042756546 = product of:
0.08551309 = sum of:
0.08551309 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08551309 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.03
0.025698557 = product of:
0.064246394 = sum of:
0.02148985 = weight(_text_:information in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02148985 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.042756546 = product of:
0.08551309 = sum of:
0.08551309 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08551309 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
-
Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016)
0.03
0.025328973 = product of:
0.042214952 = sum of:
0.009209936 = weight(_text_:information in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009209936 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.014680781 = weight(_text_:und in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014680781 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.018324234 = product of:
0.036648467 = sum of:
0.036648467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036648467 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:40:53
- Footnote
- Autoren: Milan Dobrota und Marina Dobrota
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.480-482
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.023416212 = product of:
0.058540527 = sum of:
0.015349891 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015349891 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.043190636 = product of:
0.08638127 = sum of:
0.08638127 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08638127 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Source
- Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.022027334 = product of:
0.055068336 = sum of:
0.018419871 = weight(_text_:information in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018419871 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.036648467 = product of:
0.073296934 = sum of:
0.073296934 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073296934 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
-
Ball, R.: Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel : die Verwendung von Fragezeichen im Titel von wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenbeiträgen in der Medizin, den Lebenswissenschaften und in der Physik von 1966 bis 2005 (2007)
0.02
0.019617343 = product of:
0.049043357 = sum of:
0.010744925 = weight(_text_:information in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010744925 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.03829843 = weight(_text_:und in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03829843 = score(doc=635,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Die Titel wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen sind von besonderer Bedeutung. Wir haben fast 20 Millionen wissenschaftliche Artikel untersucht und den Anteil von Artikeln mit einem Fragezeichen am Ende des Titels im Laufe der letzten 40 Jahre analysiert. Unsere Studie beschränkte sich auf die Disziplinen Physik, Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Dabei haben wir eine deutliche Zunahme der Fragezeichen-Artikel von 50 Prozent auf mehr als 200 Prozent feststellten können. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden im vorliegenden Beitrag die grundsätzlichen Funktionen und Strukturen der Titel wissenschaftlicher Publikationen untersucht. Wir gehen davon aus, dass Marketing-Aspekte die entscheidenden Beweggründe sind für die zunehmende Nutzung von Fragezeichen-Titeln bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.6/7, S.371-375
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.02
0.0182807 = product of:
0.04570175 = sum of:
0.021269435 = weight(_text_:information in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021269435 = score(doc=5092,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.024432313 = product of:
0.048864625 = sum of:
0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048864625 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.02
0.0182807 = product of:
0.04570175 = sum of:
0.021269435 = weight(_text_:information in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021269435 = score(doc=80,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.024432313 = product of:
0.048864625 = sum of:
0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048864625 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- There is a decrease in the incidence of explicit references to a paper over time, hence the assumption that information ages. In a study which attempts to discover whether information really ages it is necessary to include eponyms, anonyms and footnote references. Reports a pilot study which demonstrates that there is an increase over time in the frequency of use of eponyms
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.02
0.017749546 = product of:
0.044373862 = sum of:
0.02604963 = weight(_text_:information in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02604963 = score(doc=853,freq=16.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.018324234 = product of:
0.036648467 = sum of:
0.036648467 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036648467 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.02
0.017076572 = product of:
0.042691432 = sum of:
0.024367198 = weight(_text_:information in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024367198 = score(doc=6389,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.018324234 = product of:
0.036648467 = sum of:
0.036648467 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036648467 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.02
0.017076572 = product of:
0.042691432 = sum of:
0.024367198 = weight(_text_:information in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024367198 = score(doc=201,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.018324234 = product of:
0.036648467 = sum of:
0.036648467 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036648467 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96)
0.02
0.016719494 = product of:
0.041798733 = sum of:
0.01736642 = weight(_text_:information in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01736642 = score(doc=673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.024432313 = product of:
0.048864625 = sum of:
0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048864625 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library
- Source
- Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.02
0.016719494 = product of:
0.041798733 = sum of:
0.01736642 = weight(_text_:information in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01736642 = score(doc=3691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.024432313 = product of:
0.048864625 = sum of:
0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048864625 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- International bibliographic databases and related biblimetric indicators together provide an analytical framework and appropriate measure to cover both the 'supply side' - research capabilities and outputs - and 'demand side' - collaboration, diffusion and citation impact - related to information and communication technologies (ICT) research. Presents results of such a bibliometric study describing macro level features of this ICT knowledge base
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
-
Scientometrics pioneer Eugene Garfield dies : Eugene Garfield, founder of the Institute for Scientific Information and The Scientist, has passed away at age 91 (2017)
0.02
0.01630609 = product of:
0.040765222 = sum of:
0.0075978087 = weight(_text_:information in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075978087 = score(doc=3460,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.0960027 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
0.033167414 = weight(_text_:und in 3460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033167414 = score(doc=3460,freq=30.0), product of:
0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.33194062 = fieldWeight in 3460, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3460)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl. auch Open Password, Nr.167 vom 01.03.2017 :"Eugene Garfield, Begründer und Pionier der Zitationsindexierung und der Ziationsanalyse, ohne den die Informationswissenschaft heute anders aussähe, ist im Alter von 91 Jahren gestorben. Er hinterlässt Frau, drei Söhne, eine Tochter, eine Stieftochter, zwei Enkeltöchter und zwei Großelternkinder. Garfield machte seinen ersten Abschluss als Bachelor in Chemie an der Columbia University in New York City im Jahre 1949. 1954 sattelte er einen Abschluss in Bibliothekswissenschaft drauf. 1961 sollte er im Fach strukturelle Linguistik promovieren. Als Chemie-Student war er nach eigenen Angaben weder besonders gut noch besonders glücklich. Sein "Erweckungserlebnis" hatte er auf einer Tagung der American Chemical Society, als er entdeckte, dass sich mit der Suche nach Literatur womöglich ein Lebensunterhalt bestreiten lasse. "So I went to the Chairman of the meeting and said: "How do you get a job in this racket?" Ab 1955 war Garfield zunächst als Berater für pharmazeutische Unternehmen tätig. Dort spezialisierte er sich auf Fachinformationen, indem er Inhalte relevanter Fachzeitschriften erarbeitete. 1955 schlug er in "Science" seine bahnbrechende Idee vor, Zitationen wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen systematisch zu erfassen und Zusammenhänge zwischen Zitaten deutlich zu machen. 1960 gründete Garfield das Institute für Scientific Informationen, dessen CEO er bis 1992 blieb. 1964 brachte er den Scientific Information Index heraus. Weitere Maßgrößen wie der Social Science Index (ab 1973), der Arts and Humanities Citation Index (ab 1978) und der Journal Citation Index folgten. Diese Verzeichnisse wurden in dem "Web of Science" zusammengefasst und als Datenbank elektronisch zugänglich gemacht. Damit wurde es den Forschern ermöglich, die für sie relevante Literatur "at their fingertips" zu finden und sich in ihr zurechtzufinden. Darüber hinaus wurde es mit Hilfe der Rankings von Garfields Messgrößen möglich, die relative wissenschaftliche Bedeutung wissenschaftlicher Beiträge, Autoren, wissenschaftlicher Einrichtungen, Regionen und Länder zu messen.
Garfield wandte sich im Zusammenhang mit seinen Messgrößen gegen "Bibliographic Negligence" und "Citation Amnesia", Er schrieb 2002: "There will never be a perfect solution to the problem of acknowledging intellectual debts. But a beginning can be made if journal editors will demand a signed pledge from authors that they have searched Medline, Science Citation Index, or other appropriate print and electronic databases." Er warnte aber auch vor einen unsachgemäßen Umgang mit seinen Messgößen und vor übertriebenen Erwartungen an sie in Zusammenhang mit Karriereentscheidungen über Wissenschaftler und Überlebensentscheidungen für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen. 1982 übernahm die Thomson Corporation ISI für 210 Millionen Dollar. In der heutigen Nachfolgeorganisation Clarivate Analytics sind mehr als 4000 Mitarbeitern in über hundert Ländern beschäftigt. Garfield gründete auch eine Zeitung für Wissenschaftler, speziell für Biowissenschaftler, "The Scientist", die weiterbesteht und als kostenfreier Pushdienst bezogen werden kann. In seinen Beiträgen zur Wissenschaftspolitik kritisierte er beispielsweise die Wissenschaftsberater von Präsident Reagen 1986 als "Advocats of the administration´s science policies, rather than as objective conduits for communication between the president and the science community." Seinen Beitrag, mit dem er darum warb, die Förderung von UNESCO-Forschungsprogrammen fortzusetzen, gab er den Titel: "Let´s stand up für Global Science". Das ist auch in Trump-Zeiten ein guter Titel, da die US-Regierung den Wahrheitsbegriff, auf der Wissenschaft basiert, als bedeutungslos verwirft und sich auf Nationalismus und Abschottung statt auf internationale Kommunikation, Kooperation und gemeinsame Ausschöpfung von Interessen fokussiert."
