Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.015562532 = product of:
      0.031125063 = sum of:
        0.031125063 = product of:
          0.062250126 = sum of:
            0.062250126 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062250126 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  2. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.0124500245 = product of:
      0.024900049 = sum of:
        0.024900049 = product of:
          0.049800098 = sum of:
            0.049800098 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049800098 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  3. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.011004371 = product of:
      0.022008741 = sum of:
        0.022008741 = product of:
          0.044017483 = sum of:
            0.044017483 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044017483 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  4. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  5. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.01
    0.009337518 = product of:
      0.018675037 = sum of:
        0.018675037 = product of:
          0.037350073 = sum of:
            0.037350073 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037350073 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16089413 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  7. Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990) 0.01
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = product of:
          0.029316954 = sum of:
            0.029316954 = weight(_text_:d in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029316954 = score(doc=7510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995) 0.01
    0.0054969285 = product of:
      0.010993857 = sum of:
        0.010993857 = product of:
          0.021987714 = sum of:
            0.021987714 = weight(_text_:d in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021987714 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.2518898 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Nahl-Jakobovits, D.; Jakobovits, L.A.: ¬A content analysis method for developing user-based objectives (1992) 0.00
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = product of:
          0.018323096 = sum of:
            0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 3015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018323096 = score(doc=3015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Naves, M.M.L.: Analise de assunto : concepcoes (1996) 0.00
    0.004580774 = product of:
      0.009161548 = sum of:
        0.009161548 = product of:
          0.018323096 = sum of:
            0.018323096 = weight(_text_:d in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018323096 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject analysis: concepts
  11. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.00
    0.0032390966 = product of:
      0.006478193 = sum of:
        0.006478193 = product of:
          0.012956386 = sum of:
            0.012956386 = weight(_text_:d in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012956386 = score(doc=5740,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This guide, for beginning catalogers with humanities or social sciences backgrounds, provides assistance in subject analysis (based on Library of Congress Subject Headings) of theses and dissertations (T/Ds) that are produced by graduate students in university departments in the hard sciences (physical sciences and engineering). It is aimed at those who have had little or no experience in cataloging, especially of this type of material, and for those who desire to supplement local mentoring resources for subject analysis in the hard sciences. Theses and dissertations from these departments present a special challenge because they are the results of current research representing specific new concepts with which the cataloger may not be familiar. In fact, subject headings often have not yet been created for the specific concept(s) being researched. Additionally, T/D authors often use jargon/terminology specific to their department. Catalogers often have many other duties in addition to subject analysis of T/Ds in the hard sciences, yet they desire to provide optimal access through accurate, thorough subject analysis. Tips are provided for determining the content of the T/D, strategic searches on WorldCat for possible subject headings, evaluating the relevancy of these subject headings for final selection, and selecting appropriate subdivisions where needed. Lists of basic reference resources are also provided.
  12. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.00
    0.0032065418 = product of:
      0.0064130835 = sum of:
        0.0064130835 = product of:
          0.012826167 = sum of:
            0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012826167 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.00
    0.002290387 = product of:
      0.004580774 = sum of:
        0.004580774 = product of:
          0.009161548 = sum of:
            0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009161548 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper a framework for the construction and organization of knowledge organization and representation languages in the context of digital photograph collections is presented. It analyses exigencies of photographs as documentary objects, as well as several models of indexing, different proposals of languages and a theoretical revision of ontologies in this research field, in relation to visual documents. In considering the photograph as an analysis object, it is appropriate to study all its attributes: features, components or properties of an objeet that can be represented in an information processing system. The attributes which are related to visual features include cognitive and affective answers and elements that describe spatial, semantic, symbolic or emotional features about a photograph. In any case, it is necessary to treat: a) morphological and material attributes (emulsion, state of preservation); b) biographical attributes: (school or trend, publication or exhibition); c) attributes of content: what and how a photograph says something; d) relational attributes: visual documents establish relationships with other documents that can be analysed in order to understand them.
  14. Huang, X.; Soergel, D.; Klavans, J.L.: Modeling and analyzing the topicality of art images (2015) 0.00
    0.002290387 = product of:
      0.004580774 = sum of:
        0.004580774 = product of:
          0.009161548 = sum of:
            0.009161548 = weight(_text_:d in 2127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009161548 = score(doc=2127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)