Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992) 0.02
    0.024329849 = product of:
      0.072989546 = sum of:
        0.072989546 = weight(_text_:citation in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072989546 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23479973 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050071523 = queryNorm
            0.31085873 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a theoretical investigation of the concept of 'subject' or 'subject matter' in library and information science. Most conceptions of 'subject' in the literature are not explicit but implicit. Various indexing and classification theories, including automatic indexing and citation indexing, have their own more or less implicit concepts of subject. This fact puts the emphasis on making the implicit theorie of 'subject matter' explicit as the first step. ... The different conceptions of 'subject' can therefore be classified into epistemological positions, e.g. 'subjective idealism' (or the empiric/positivistic viewpoint), 'objective idealism' (the rationalistic viewpoint), 'pragmatism' and 'materialism/realism'. The third and final step is to propose a new theory of subject matter based on an explicit theory of knowledge. In this article this is done from the point of view of a realistic/materialistic epistemology. From this standpoint the subject of a document is defined as the epistemological potentials of that document
  2. Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996) 0.01
    0.010563595 = product of:
      0.031690784 = sum of:
        0.031690784 = product of:
          0.06338157 = sum of:
            0.06338157 = weight(_text_:index in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06338157 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21880072 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
  3. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.009045334 = product of:
      0.027136 = sum of:
        0.027136 = product of:
          0.054272 = sum of:
            0.054272 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054272 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  4. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01
    0.0067839995 = product of:
      0.020351999 = sum of:
        0.020351999 = product of:
          0.040703997 = sum of:
            0.040703997 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040703997 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17534193 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050071523 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18