-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.02
0.020899368 = product of:
0.05224842 = sum of:
0.021708025 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021708025 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.030540392 = product of:
0.061080784 = sum of:
0.061080784 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061080784 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.02
0.016158009 = product of:
0.04039502 = sum of:
0.018799702 = weight(_text_:information in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018799702 = score(doc=4888,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.021595318 = product of:
0.043190636 = sum of:
0.043190636 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043190636 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.01468489 = product of:
0.036712226 = sum of:
0.012279914 = weight(_text_:information in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012279914 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.024432313 = product of:
0.048864625 = sum of:
0.048864625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048864625 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.01
0.011013667 = product of:
0.027534168 = sum of:
0.009209936 = weight(_text_:information in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009209936 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.018324234 = product of:
0.036648467 = sum of:
0.036648467 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036648467 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.01
0.011013667 = product of:
0.027534168 = sum of:
0.009209936 = weight(_text_:information in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009209936 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.018324234 = product of:
0.036648467 = sum of:
0.036648467 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036648467 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995)
0.01
0.009556287 = product of:
0.023890717 = sum of:
0.009209936 = weight(_text_:information in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009209936 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
0.014680781 = weight(_text_:und in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014680781 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09991972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.5, S.348-369
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985)
0.01
0.008363532 = product of:
0.020908829 = sum of:
0.004604968 = weight(_text_:information in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004604968 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.016303862 = product of:
0.032607723 = sum of:
0.032607723 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032607723 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21059684 = queryWeight, product of:
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.1548348 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.
- Footnote
- Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
-
Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990)
0.01
0.0069465684 = product of:
0.03473284 = sum of:
0.03473284 = weight(_text_:information in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03473284 = score(doc=7510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 12(1990) no.3, S.251-262
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.01
0.006380831 = product of:
0.031904154 = sum of:
0.031904154 = weight(_text_:information in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031904154 = score(doc=1329,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995)
0.01
0.006380831 = product of:
0.031904154 = sum of:
0.031904154 = weight(_text_:information in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031904154 = score(doc=521,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Reviews the methods of calculating the information content of images, with particular reference to the information content of printed and photographic images; and printed and television images
-
Renouf, A.: Making sense of text : automated approaches to meaning extraction (1993)
0.01
0.006078247 = product of:
0.030391235 = sum of:
0.030391235 = weight(_text_:information in 7111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030391235 = score(doc=7111,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7111, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7111)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.01
0.0055068335 = product of:
0.013767084 = sum of:
0.004604968 = weight(_text_:information in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004604968 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.009162117 = product of:
0.018324234 = sum of:
0.018324234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018324234 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1578718 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
- Footnote
- This document will be particularly useful to subject cataloguing teachers and trainers who could use the model to design case descriptions and exercises. We believe it is an accurate description of the reality of subject cataloguing today. But now that we know how things are dope, the next interesting question may be: Is that the best way? Is there a better, more efficient, way to do things? We can only hope that Dr. Sauperl will soon provide her own view of methods and techniques that could improve the flow of work or address the cataloguers' concern as to the lack of feedback an their work. Her several excellent suggestions for further research in this area all build an bits and pieces of what is done already, and stay well away from what could be done by the various actors in the area, from the designers of controlled vocabularies and authority files to those who use these tools an a daily basis to index, classify, or search for information."
-
Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984)
0.01
0.0052639167 = product of:
0.026319582 = sum of:
0.026319582 = weight(_text_:information in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026319582 = score(doc=5828,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
- Source
- Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
-
Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
-
Kremer-Marietti, A.: Thematic analysis (1986)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.41, [=Suppl.6]
-
Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
-
Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
-
Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.105-136
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1969)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 4(1969), S.73-110
-
Berinstein, P.: Moving multimedia : the information value in images (1997)
0.00
0.0049119657 = product of:
0.024559828 = sum of:
0.024559828 = weight(_text_:information in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024559828 = score(doc=2489,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07914162 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.045082662 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Considers the role of pictures in information communication, comparing the way it conveys information with text. Categorises the purposes of images as conveyors of information: the instructional image, the documentary image, the location image, the graphical representation of numbers, the concepts image, the image making the unseen visible, the image as a surrogate for an object or document, the decorative image, the image as a statement, the strong image and the emotional image. Gives examples of how the value of images is being recognised and of how they can be used well
