Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.03 
    0.02997284 = product of:
  0.05994568 = sum of:
    0.05994568 = sum of:
      0.029520772 = weight(_text_:c in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029520772 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037426826 = queryNorm
          0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
      0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03042491 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037426826 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
  2. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey (2004) 0.01 
    0.014173369 = product of:
  0.028346738 = sum of:
    0.028346738 = product of:
      0.056693476 = sum of:
        0.056693476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056693476 = score(doc=2644,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.43256867 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In 2003, OCLC published Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22), in print and Web versions. The changes and updates in the new edition reflect a modern view of knowledge structures and address the general needs of Dewey users. The content of DDC 22 has been shaped by a number of social, geopolitical, and technical trends. The World Wide Web has provided a vehicle for more frequent distribution of updates to the DDC, and a medium for direct communication with Dewey users around the world. In addition to updating the system itself, other strategies are needed to accommodate the needs of the global Dewey user community. Translation of the system is one approach; another is mapping. Mapping terminology to the DDC is a strategy for supporting effective local implementation of the system while maintaining the internal cohesiveness of the DDC. This paper explores the usefulness of mapping terminology from English-language general subject headings lists produced outside the U.S.
    Object
    DDC-22
  3. Higgins, C.: Library of Congress Classification : Teddy Roosevelt's world in numbers? (2012) 0.01 
    0.009840257 = product of:
  0.019680513 = sum of:
    0.019680513 = product of:
      0.039361026 = sum of:
        0.039361026 = weight(_text_:c in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039361026 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978) 0.01 
    0.008873932 = product of:
  0.017747864 = sum of:
    0.017747864 = product of:
      0.03549573 = sum of:
        0.03549573 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549573 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
  5. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.01 
    0.008873932 = product of:
  0.017747864 = sum of:
    0.017747864 = product of:
      0.03549573 = sum of:
        0.03549573 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549573 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  6. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.01 
    0.008873932 = product of:
  0.017747864 = sum of:
    0.017747864 = product of:
      0.03549573 = sum of:
        0.03549573 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549573 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    DDC-22
  7. McIlwaine, I.C.; Mitchell, J.S.: ¬The new ecumenism : exploration of a DDC / UDC view of religion (2006) 0.01 
    0.008610224 = product of:
  0.017220449 = sum of:
    0.017220449 = product of:
      0.034440897 = sum of:
        0.034440897 = weight(_text_:c in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034440897 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  8. Salah, A.A.; Gao, C.; Suchecki, K.; Scharnhorst, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The evolution of classification systems : ontogeny of the UDC (2012) 0.01 
    0.008610224 = product of:
  0.017220449 = sum of:
    0.017220449 = product of:
      0.034440897 = sum of:
        0.034440897 = weight(_text_:c in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034440897 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC German - the project, the aims, the methods : new ideas for a well-established traditional classification system (2006) 0.01 
    0.0076062274 = product of:
  0.015212455 = sum of:
    0.015212455 = product of:
      0.03042491 = sum of:
        0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 5779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03042491 = score(doc=5779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5779)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper will give a short outline of the project DDC German. The project is not limited to a mere translation of DDC 22, but aims at the implementation of Dewey in the library networks of the German-language countries. Use of DDC mainly for retrieval purposes, not for shelving, leads to certain new aspects in classifying with Dewey which are described in detail and presented together with the German web service Melvil. Based an the German experience of cooperation and data exchange in the field of verbal indexing the paper develops some ideas an future Dewey cooperation between European and American libraries.
  10. Svanberg, M.: Mapping two classification schemes : DDC and SAB (2008) 0.01 
    0.0076062274 = product of:
  0.015212455 = sum of:
    0.015212455 = product of:
      0.03042491 = sum of:
        0.03042491 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03042491 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2008 11:22:44
  11. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.01 
    0.007380193 = product of:
  0.014760386 = sum of:
    0.014760386 = product of:
      0.029520772 = sum of:
        0.029520772 = weight(_text_:c in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029520772 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Zins, C.; Santos, P.L.V.A.C.: Mapping the knowledge covered by library classification systems (2011) 0.01 
    0.007380193 = product of:
  0.014760386 = sum of:
    0.014760386 = product of:
      0.029520772 = sum of:
        0.029520772 = weight(_text_:c in 4449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029520772 = score(doc=4449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 4449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.01 
    0.0063385232 = product of:
  0.0126770465 = sum of:
    0.0126770465 = product of:
      0.025354093 = sum of:
        0.025354093 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025354093 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13106237 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22
  14. Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985) 0.00 
    0.0049201283 = product of:
  0.009840257 = sum of:
    0.009840257 = product of:
      0.019680513 = sum of:
        0.019680513 = weight(_text_:c in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019680513 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Slavic, A.: Use of the Universal Decimal Classification : a world-wide survey (2008) 0.00 
    0.0049201283 = product of:
  0.009840257 = sum of:
    0.009840257 = product of:
      0.019680513 = sum of:
        0.019680513 = weight(_text_:c in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019680513 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1291003 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037426826 = queryNorm
            0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a general overview with up-to-date information on the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) use worldwide. Design/methodology/approach - The research combined e-mail interviews with LIS professionals in 208 countries, literature research and information obtained from UDC distributors/publishers (AENOR, BSI, UDC Consortium). The following categorisation of UDC use was offered: A - dominant system; B - used in some kind of libraries only; or C - rarely used. Findings - The paper finds that, of the 208 countries contacted and researched through the literature in 2004-2006, the UDC was found to be used in 124 (60 per cent) of these. In 34 (28 per cent) of the countries researched (in Europe, Asia and Africa), UDC is the main classification system used across national information networks. In 45 (36 per cent) of the countries it is used in certain kinds of libraries. In the remaining 45 (36 per cent) of the countries it is used rarely, in only a few libraries or information centres. Research limitations/implications - It was beyond the scope of this research to provide any information regarding the actual number of institutions using UDC in a given country or to give an estimate of the size and number of document collections organised by it. Although a decline in UDC use since the 1980s was reported from a number of countries, it was not possible to measure this accurately. Practical implications - The interest shown for using UDC in the organisation of digital collections, information exchange and cross domain and cross collection resource discovery depends on accurate knowledge of its actual usage worldwide. This gives a measure of its global importance and verifies its credentials as an indexing standard. This research, which attempted wider and more systematic coverage than previous surveys, should help clarify the status of UDC and its potential use in the networked environment. Originality/value - The paper provides up-to-date information on the presence of the UDC system across countries and languages.

Authors

Years