-
OWLED 2009; OWL: Experiences and Directions, Sixth International Workshop, Chantilly, Virginia, USA, 23-24 October 2009, Co-located with ISWC 2009. (2009)
0.00
0.0038179322 = product of:
0.0076358644 = sum of:
0.0076358644 = product of:
0.015271729 = sum of:
0.015271729 = weight(_text_:j in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015271729 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Demo/Position Papers * Conjunctive Query Answering in Distributed Ontology Systems for Ontologies with Large OWL ABoxes, Xueying Chen and Michel Dumontier. * Node-Link and Containment Methods in Ontology Visualization, Julia Dmitrieva and Fons J. Verbeek. * A JC3IEDM OWL-DL Ontology, Steven Wartik. * Semantically Enabled Temporal Reasoning in a Virtual Observatory, Patrick West, Eric Rozell, Stephan Zednik, Peter Fox and Deborah L. McGuinness. * Developing an Ontology from the Application Up, James Malone, Tomasz Adamusiak, Ele Holloway, Misha Kapushesky and Helen Parkinson.
-
Hedden, H.: Indexing specialities : Web Sites (2007)
0.00
0.0038179322 = product of:
0.0076358644 = sum of:
0.0076358644 = product of:
0.015271729 = sum of:
0.015271729 = weight(_text_:j in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015271729 = score(doc=1146,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.105320126 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: IWP 60(2009) H.4, S.245 (J. Fassbender): "Heather Heddens Buch über Website-Indexing gehört zur Indexing Specialties-Serie, die vom Information Today-Verlag in Zusammenarbeit mit der American Society of Indexers herausgegeben wird. Der Bereich Website-Indexing befasst sich mit der Index-Erstellung und -Pflege für Websites und Intranets - ähnlich zu Registern für Printpublikationen. Ein Website-Index hat oft die Bezeichnung Site Index oder A-Z Index und sollte zudem nicht mit Site Maps verwechselt werden. Das Buch füllt gerade auch hierzulande eine Riesenlücke aus: Nach Einschätzung des Deutschen Netzwerks der Indexer (DNI) ist das Wissensdefizit über Website-Indexing in der deutschen Web- und IT-Szene enorm. Die Autorin beginnt in diesem Sinne auch gleich mit zwei Kernaussagen des Buches: 1. Website-Indexing sei deshalb in der Web-Szene nicht so verbreitet, weil die Kenntnisse der Methoden zur Index-Erstellung fehlen und/oder die nötigen Tools unbekannt sind. 2. Ein guter Index stelle für viele Sites die effektivste Suchmethode dar - trotz der Konkurrenz zu Navigationsmenüs und Sucheingabe. Verdeutlicht werden sodann die Unterschiede zu Print-Registern, der bedeutendste betrifft die Locators (Fundstellen), die in der Regel keine Seitenangaben, sondern Links sind.
-
Lazar, J.: Web usability : a user-centered design approach (2006)
0.00
0.0035995808 = product of:
0.0071991617 = sum of:
0.0071991617 = product of:
0.014398323 = sum of:
0.014398323 = weight(_text_:j in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014398323 = score(doc=340,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.09929676 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.7, S.1066-1067 (X. Zhu u. J. Liao): "The user, without whom any product or service would be nothing, plays a very important role during the whole life cycle of products or services. The user's involvement should be from the very beginning, not just after products or services are ready to work. According to ISO 9241-11: 1998, Part 11, Usability refers to "the extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of user." As an academic topic of human-computer interaction, Web usability has been studied widely for a long time. This classroom-oriented book, bridging academia and the educational community, talks about Web usability in a student-friendly fashion. It outlines not only the methodology of user-centered Web site design but also details the methods to implement at every stage of the methodology. That is, the book presents the user-centered Web-design approach from both macrocosm and microcosm points of view, which makes it both recapitulative and practical. The most important key word in Web Usability is "user-centered," which means Web developers should not substitute their own personal preferences for the users' needs. The book classifies Web sites into five types: E-commerce, informational, entertainment, community, and intranet. Since the methods used during Web development differ somewhat depending on the type of Web site, it is necessary to have a classification in advance. With Figure 1.3 on p. 17, the book explains the whole user-centered Webdevelopment life cycle (called "methodology" in this book review), which provides a clear path for Web development that is easy to understand, remember, and perform. Since all the following chapters are based on the methodology, a clear presentation of it is paramount. The table on p. 93 summarizes concisely all types of methods for requirements gathering and their advantages and disadvantages. According to this table, appropriate methods can be easily chosen for different Web site development projects. As the author remarked, "requirements gathering is central to the concept of user-centered design," (p. 98) and "one of the hallmarks of user-centered design is usability testing" (p. 205). Stage 2 (collect user requirements) and Stage 5 (perform usability testing) of the user-centered Web-development life cycle are the two stages with the most user involvement: however, this does not mean that all other stages are user unrelated. For example, in Stage 4 (create and modify physical design), frame is not suggested to be used just because most users are unfamiliar with the concept of frame (p. 201). Note that frequently there are several rounds of usability testing to be performed in the four case studies, and some of them are performed before the physical-design stage or even the conceptual-design stage, which embodies the idea of an iterative design process.
-
Ding, J.: Can data die? : why one of the Internet's oldest images lives on wirhout its subjects's consent (2021)
0.00
0.00318161 = product of:
0.00636322 = sum of:
0.00636322 = product of:
0.01272644 = sum of:
0.01272644 = weight(_text_:j in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01272644 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.08776677 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Waesche, N.M.: Internet entrepreneurship in Europe : venture failure and the timing of telecommunications reform (2003)
0.00
0.002545288 = product of:
0.005090576 = sum of:
0.005090576 = product of:
0.010181152 = sum of:
0.010181152 = weight(_text_:j in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010181152 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.070213415 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.2, S.181-182 (J. Scholl): "The book is based an a doctoral thesis titled "Global opportunity and national political economy: The development of internet ventures in Germany," which was supervised by Razeen Sally and accepted at the International Relations Department of the London School of Economics & Political Science, UK, in 2002. Its primary audience, although it is certainly of interest to policy makers, trade press journalists, and industry practitioners, is the academic community, and, in particular, (international) policy, business, business history, information technology, and information science scholars. The book's self-stated purpose is to explain "why Europe, despite initiating a tremendous amount of change ... failed to produce independent internet ventures of note" (p. 1) in contrast to the United States, where Internet start-ups such as Amazon.com, eBay, E*trade, and Yahoo managed to survive the notorious dot.com shakeout of 200I-2002. A few pages down, the objective is restated as "to explore the hypothesis of a global opportunity for technology innovation delivered via the internet and to explain Europe's entrepreneurial response" (p. 4). As a proxy case for Europe, the study provides a broad account of the changing legal and socioeconomic setting during the phase of early Internet adoption and development in Germany throughout the 1990s. The author highlights and details various facets of the entrepreneurial opportunity and compares the German case in some detail to corresponding developments in Sweden. Waesche concludes that starting an Internet business in Germany during that particular period of time was a "wrong country, wrong time" (p. I86) proposition.
-
Janes, J.: Introduction to reference work in the digital age. (2003)
0.00
0.002545288 = product of:
0.005090576 = sum of:
0.005090576 = product of:
0.010181152 = sum of:
0.010181152 = weight(_text_:j in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010181152 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.070213415 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bruce, H.: ¬The user's view of the Internet (2002)
0.00
0.0023185585 = product of:
0.004637117 = sum of:
0.004637117 = product of:
0.009274234 = sum of:
0.009274234 = weight(_text_:22 in 4344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009274234 = score(doc=4344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045634337 = queryNorm
0.058035173 = fieldWeight in 4344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01171875 = fieldNorm(doc=4344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Chapter 2 (Technology and People) focuses an several theories of technological acceptance and diffusion. Unfortunately, Bruce's presentation is somewhat confusing as he moves from one theory to next, never quite connecting them into a logical sequence or coherent whole. Two theories are of particular interest to Bruce: the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Theory of Diffusion of Innovations is an "information-centric view of technology acceptance" in which technology adopters are placed in the information flows of society from which they learn about innovations and "drive innovation adoption decisions" (p. 20). The Theory of Planned Behavior maintains that the "performance of a behavior is a joint function of intentions and perceived behavioral control" (i.e., how muck control a person thinks they have) (pp. 22-23). Bruce combines these two theories to form the basis for the Technology Acceptance Model. This model posits that "an individual's acceptance of information technology is based an beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors" (p. 24). In all these theories and models echoes a recurring theme: "individual perceptions of the innovation or technology are critical" in terms of both its characteristics and its use (pp. 24-25). From these, in turn, Bruce derives a predictive theory of the role personal perceptions play in technology adoption: Personal Innovativeness of Information Technology Adoption (PIITA). Personal inventiveness is defined as "the willingness of an individual to try out any new information technology" (p. 26). In general, the PIITA theory predicts that information technology will be adopted by individuals that have a greater exposure to mass media, rely less an the evaluation of information technology by others, exhibit a greater ability to cope with uncertainty and take risks, and requires a less positive perception of an information technology prior to its adoption. Chapter 3 (A Focus an Usings) introduces the User-Centered Paradigm (UCP). The UCP is characteristic of the shift of emphasis from technology to users as the driving force behind technology and research agendas for Internet development [for a dissenting view, see Andrew Dillion's (2003) challenge to the utility of user-centerness for design guidance]. It entails the "broad acceptance of the user-oriented perspective across a range of disciplines and professional fields," such as business, education, cognitive engineering, and information science (p. 34).
